Time magazine covers in USA a d elsewhere: pathetic

[novasteve]

TIME Magazine -- U.S. Edition -- September 16, 2013 Vol. 182 No. 12

In the USA they carry his water, abroad they cater to anti Americans

 

[Missouri_Mike]

TIME Magazine -- U.S. Edition -- September 16, 2013 Vol. 182 No. 12

In the USA they carry his water, abroad they cater to anti Americans

Wait a minute...that can't be right...obie was our guy to make us better liked in the world right? All the apology speeches and bowing and sucking Putin's dick hasn't done a thing? I mean even to the point an American magazine can't even sell this obie sh*t to anyone but Americans. They have to change up the obie love fest at home to keep credibility across the world.

We are pretty much history's lamest world power right now.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

TIME Magazine -- U.S. Edition -- September 16, 2013 Vol. 182 No. 12

In the USA they carry his water, abroad they cater to anti Americans

You’re making even less sense than usual, which is remarkable in of itself.

 

[novasteve]

? You deny they carry obama's water here?

 

[Freewill]

It the reset button, HIT THE RESET BUTTON!!!!!

 

[Mac1958]

.

Pretty interesting that they would do this.

The thug Putin is obviously the Man Of The Hour right now, so it's certainly understandable he'd be on the cover. It's massive, global news. Clearly Time just doesn't want the American electorate to see it, they have their political agenda to consider and don't want to bruise O and/or the Dems.

Obviously.

.

 

[Edgetho]

libturds everywhere let their ideology run their lives. Instead of admitting that it's the content of their mag-rags and viewspapers that's causing their demise (while European Papers are having a hey-day), they blame everything and anything but themselves.

Typical libturds.

I wouldn't pay a lot of attention to 'Time' mag-rag. Nobody else does

Time Warner Looking to Sell Off Time Magazine Group - Publius Forum &laquo Publius Forum

Time Inc. has had quite a lot of trouble with its magazine empire. According to The Wall Street Journal the magazine division’s “revenue fell 7% to $3.4 billion and operating income declined 25% to $420 million because of lower advertising and subscription revenues.” The Journal went on to note that there are plans afoot to “cut the workforce by 6% in a bid to cut costs, leading to a $60 million restructuring charge in the first quarter.”

So, why would Time Warner want to keep Time magazine at all if it is losing so much money? Imagine the public relations hit Time Warner would take if it lost its flagship property. This seems like a calculated loss as opposed to a sensible business decision.

 

[midcan5]

This is way too funny, do you guys realize where you live? In America sports and money are the top objects of worship and considering all the news on fantasy football, why not extend the fantasy. Without football and sports what would Americans aspire to be in life, please don't say representatives in congress, they make couch potatoes look sweaty and ambitious

"The fiscal year is about to end, so the annual awakening of Tea Party Republicans in the House and Senate is about to begin. Most of the time they sit around and do virtually nothing but gripe (they have made the current Congress the least productive ever), but a new fiscal year finally gives them a chance to govern the only way they know how: by creating a false crisis in order to tear down a piece of the government." NYT Editorial page today

 

[Connery]

Moved to proper forum