Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who's Marshall law?Time for Marshall law
The military's martial law would be effective, so we don't want any side to use it.Maybe it should be marital law?
But it will never be time for martial law because the military is likely worse then any problem we could be having.
I'd rather listen to her than you fucked up, brain dead pack of shit eating pussy leftist cucks.Yeah, lets listen to the dumb racist bitch in the OP who doesn't know how to spell what she's endorsing.
The military's martial law would be effective, so we don't want any side to use it.Maybe it should be marital law?
But it will never be time for martial law because the military is likely worse then any problem we could be having.
Who is Marshall
Rigby, you sound goofy.
You do not understand the military mind set in the slightest.
Your second para has nothing to do with the military mind set.Rigby, you sound goofy.
You do not understand the military mind set in the slightest.
I was heavily involved in the anti war movement during Vietnam, and I can tell you that those in the military, at the bottom, are VERY anti-war. About a third of the anti war demonstrators during Vietnam, were veterans.
The Pentagon can fool some of the people when they claim lies like Saddam being behind the 9/11 attack, that we was getting nuclear weapons, that he had stockpiles of anthrax, etc., but when it comes to murdering US civilians, I think many in the military would switch sides. Possibly most of them.
Your second para has nothing to do with the military mind set.Rigby, you sound goofy.
You do not understand the military mind set in the slightest.
I was heavily involved in the anti war movement during Vietnam, and I can tell you that those in the military, at the bottom, are VERY anti-war. About a third of the anti war demonstrators during Vietnam, were veterans.
The Pentagon can fool some of the people when they claim lies like Saddam being behind the 9/11 attack, that we was getting nuclear weapons, that he had stockpiles of anthrax, etc., but when it comes to murdering US civilians, I think many in the military would switch sides. Possibly most of them.
Service personnel will follow orders even if they don't agree, unless it is something like shooting POWs, and that particularly heinous crime occurred far too often in Nam.
You can believe all that, but you are wrong, I think.Your second para has nothing to do with the military mind set.Rigby, you sound goofy.
You do not understand the military mind set in the slightest.
I was heavily involved in the anti war movement during Vietnam, and I can tell you that those in the military, at the bottom, are VERY anti-war. About a third of the anti war demonstrators during Vietnam, were veterans.
The Pentagon can fool some of the people when they claim lies like Saddam being behind the 9/11 attack, that we was getting nuclear weapons, that he had stockpiles of anthrax, etc., but when it comes to murdering US civilians, I think many in the military would switch sides. Possibly most of them.
Service personnel will follow orders even if they don't agree, unless it is something like shooting POWs, and that particularly heinous crime occurred far too often in Nam.
That was Vietnam.
People are more cynical of the Pentagon now that their lies are universally understood and on record for all to see.
Shooting POWs is one thing, because they are not white, are not US citizens, etc.
But shooting US civilians is something totally different.
So we are talking about 2 changes.
A more sophisticated soldier who no longer is fooled by military rhetoric, and the fact those being murdered would be US citizens, just like their friends and family.
You can believe all that, but you are wrong, I think.Your second para has nothing to do with the military mind set.Rigby, you sound goofy.
You do not understand the military mind set in the slightest.
I was heavily involved in the anti war movement during Vietnam, and I can tell you that those in the military, at the bottom, are VERY anti-war. About a third of the anti war demonstrators during Vietnam, were veterans.
The Pentagon can fool some of the people when they claim lies like Saddam being behind the 9/11 attack, that we was getting nuclear weapons, that he had stockpiles of anthrax, etc., but when it comes to murdering US civilians, I think many in the military would switch sides. Possibly most of them.
Service personnel will follow orders even if they don't agree, unless it is something like shooting POWs, and that particularly heinous crime occurred far too often in Nam.
That was Vietnam.
People are more cynical of the Pentagon now that their lies are universally understood and on record for all to see.
Shooting POWs is one thing, because they are not white, are not US citizens, etc.
But shooting US civilians is something totally different.
So we are talking about 2 changes.
A more sophisticated soldier who no longer is fooled by military rhetoric, and the fact those being murdered would be US citizens, just like their friends and family.
Let's hope we don't find out.