Tightening The Noose On Liberty

[Wildman]

All you expose is your stupidity and inability to reason with liberals like myself,

... ... ... ... ... ...
there is no possible way to REASON with a libertardfool, their and your head is filled with concrete which makes it virtually impossible to REASON !!

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Of course, you are wrong about my views, but your vulgarity gives you away.

You don't have views, that's why you must cut and paste the views of others, which you do not understand.

And only children worry about adults swearing. Grow up.

 

[NYcarbineer]

As posted in the OP, the Progressive/Liberal Democrats who run the country do so with a jaundiced view of governance, and of justice.

But not without a motive.....the self-same motive that caused a racist party, and the racist LBJ to provide a public relations mirage:


Without the black vote, the Democrat Party is doomed.


4. "On the national level, Democrats typically get around 90 percent of the black vote, even when a black man isn’t running for president as a Democrat. Al Gore got 92 percent of the black vote in 2000; John Kerry got 88 percent in 2004. These percentages aren’t just impressive; for Democrats, they’re imperative. Since 1980, the percentage of white votes received by the Democrats’ candidate for president has usually hovered around 39 percent. Unless Democrats maintain a vise grip on at least 90 percent of the black vote, the party’s presidential prospects usually fade to oblivion."
Blacks, Democrats, and Republicans | National Review Online



5. The Democrats have used the Department of Justice to make certain that blacks know who their masters are....and to keep them in the fold.

And they even overstep by oppressing the very black voters that keep them in power!!!

"Justice concludes black voters need Democratic Party
KINSTON, N.C. | Voters in this small city decided overwhelmingly last year to do away with the party affiliation of candidates in local elections, but the Obama administration recently overruled the electorate and decided that equal rights for black voters cannot be achieved without the Democratic Party.

The Justice Department’s ruling, ... went so far as to say partisan elections are needed so that black voters can elect their “candidates of choice” - identified by the department as those who are Democrats and almost exclusively black.

.... he city cannot get rid of party affiliations for local elections because that would violate black voters’ right to elect the candidates they want." Justice concludes bl

As posted in the OP, the Progressive/Liberal Democrats who run the country do so with a jaundiced view of governance, and of justice.

But not without a motive.....the self-same motive that caused a racist party, and the racist LBJ to provide a public relations mirage:


Without the black vote, the Democrat Party is doomed.


4. "On the national level, Democrats typically get around 90 percent of the black vote, even when a black man isn’t running for president as a Democrat. Al Gore got 92 percent of the black vote in 2000; John Kerry got 88 percent in 2004. These percentages aren’t just impressive; for Democrats, they’re imperative. Since 1980, the percentage of white votes received by the Democrats’ candidate for president has usually hovered around 39 percent. Unless Democrats maintain a vise grip on at least 90 percent of the black vote, the party’s presidential prospects usually fade to oblivion."

Blacks, Democrats, and Republicans | National Review Online



5. The Democrats have used the Department of Justice to make certain that blacks know who their masters are....and to keep them in the fold.

And they even overstep by oppressing the very black voters that keep them in power!!!

"Justice concludes black voters need Democratic Party
KINSTON, N.C. | Voters in this small city decided overwhelmingly last year to do away with the party affiliation of candidates in local elections, but the Obama administration recently overruled the electorate and decided that equal rights for black voters cannot be achieved without the Democratic Party.

The Justice Department’s ruling, ... went so far as to say partisan elections are needed so that black voters can elect their “candidates of choice” - identified by the department as those who are Democrats and almost exclusively black.

.... he city cannot get rid of party affiliations for local elections because that would violate black voters’ right to elect the candidates they want." Justice concludes black voters need Democratic Party - Washington Times


Kinston, North Carolina is a majority black town....it had voted to leave off party designations......But the Obama DoJ order: make sure blacks know who the Democrats are, so they vote for 'em!

ack voters need Democratic Party - Washington Times


Kinston, North Carolina is a majority black town....it had voted to leave off party designations......But the Obama DoJ order: make sure blacks know who the Democrats are, so they vote for 'em!

Stop fibbing, Uncle Leftie.

The aim of what are laughingly called 'Liberals' is the destruction of liberty, and the United States Constitution.

Progressive/Liberal Woodrow Wilson said exactly that:

"Justly revered as our great Constitution is, it could be stripped off and thrown aside like a garment, and the nation would still stand forth in the living vestment of flesh and sinew, warm with the heart-blood of one people, ready to recreate constitutions and laws. …"
Woodrow Wilson [Woodrow Wilson
"The Modern Democratic State" (1885; first published in 1966)
The Papers of Woodrow Wilson, Volume 5]


Bet you just hate it when I expose your lies, huh?

You have no idea what Wilson was talking about when he said that, do you?

Wilson wouldn't say that today with people like her around. In their version of the Constitution no one would have any rights at all. It would be dog eat dog since can't see beyond their own needs and those close to them.

"Wilson wouldn't say that today with people like her around. "


'Tis a consummation. Devoutly to be wished.'
Hamlet


I glow with pride!

Pride in fascists is to be expected. Carry on...

Try to be more accurate.

Fascism, like communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, and Progressivism, are all permutations of the same worldview.

Yours.

You're becoming repetitive. Wrong and repetitive.

 

[NYcarbineer]

[

Conservatives stand for individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional governance.


.

Individualism? What does that mean? In your own words, in the context of what conservatives 'stand for'.

Her version of Individualism is I Got Mine, **** Everyone Else...

Of course, you are wrong about my views, but your vulgarity gives you away.

Gutter language is a well-known trait of one who recognizes that they've lost the argument. Defaulting to vulgarity proves that your thoughts are no more articulated on this subject than on any other.: a second-rater with a third grader's vocabulary.

That would be exemplified by the dozens of time you referred to me as 'sewage' in your last gasp of a lost argument.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You have no idea what Wilson was talking about when he said that, do you?

Wilson wouldn't say that today with people like her around. In their version of the Constitution no one would have any rights at all. It would be dog eat dog since can't see beyond their own needs and those close to them.

"Wilson wouldn't say that today with people like her around. "


'Tis a consummation. Devoutly to be wished.'
Hamlet


I glow with pride!

Pride in fascists is to be expected. Carry on...

Try to be more accurate.

Fascism, like communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, and Progressivism, are all permutations of the same worldview.

Yours.

I'm being entirely accurate. You are a fascist, and not even an American in name only.

As to the above, total nonsense, as usual.

Quite the pattern we are setting.....

You attempt to lie, I reveal same.

OK....let's do that:

...let's smack you in the kisser one more time:
I stated, correctly, that communism, socialism, Nazism, Liberalism, Progressivism...are all 'fruit of the same poison tree.'

Deny it?

Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:


Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life

9. Which restricts free speech and thought?

10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”



And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.

Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.


In your face, you dolt.....
...You're so dense that light bends around you.


Don't ever change.

 

[PoliticalChic]

As posted in the OP, the Progressive/Liberal Democrats who run the country do so with a jaundiced view of governance, and of justice.

But not without a motive.....the self-same motive that caused a racist party, and the racist LBJ to provide a public relations mirage:


Without the black vote, the Democrat Party is doomed.


4. "On the national level, Democrats typically get around 90 percent of the black vote, even when a black man isn’t running for president as a Democrat. Al Gore got 92 percent of the black vote in 2000; John Kerry got 88 percent in 2004. These percentages aren’t just impressive; for Democrats, they’re imperative. Since 1980, the percentage of white votes received by the Democrats’ candidate for president has usually hovered around 39 percent. Unless Democrats maintain a vise grip on at least 90 percent of the black vote, the party’s presidential prospects usually fade to oblivion."
Blacks, Democrats, and Republicans | National Review Online



5. The Democrats have used the Department of Justice to make certain that blacks know who their masters are....and to keep them in the fold.

And they even overstep by oppressing the very black voters that keep them in power!!!

"Justice concludes black voters need Democratic Party
KINSTON, N.C. | Voters in this small city decided overwhelmingly last year to do away with the party affiliation of candidates in local elections, but the Obama administration recently overruled the electorate and decided that equal rights for black voters cannot be achieved without the Democratic Party.

The Justice Department’s ruling, ... went so far as to say partisan elections are needed so that black voters can elect their “candidates of choice” - identified by the department as those who are Democrats and almost exclusively black.

.... he city cannot get rid of party affiliations for local elections because that would violate black voters’ right to elect the candidates they want." Justice concludes bl

As posted in the OP, the Progressive/Liberal Democrats who run the country do so with a jaundiced view of governance, and of justice.

But not without a motive.....the self-same motive that caused a racist party, and the racist LBJ to provide a public relations mirage:


Without the black vote, the Democrat Party is doomed.


4. "On the national level, Democrats typically get around 90 percent of the black vote, even when a black man isn’t running for president as a Democrat. Al Gore got 92 percent of the black vote in 2000; John Kerry got 88 percent in 2004. These percentages aren’t just impressive; for Democrats, they’re imperative. Since 1980, the percentage of white votes received by the Democrats’ candidate for president has usually hovered around 39 percent. Unless Democrats maintain a vise grip on at least 90 percent of the black vote, the party’s presidential prospects usually fade to oblivion."

Blacks, Democrats, and Republicans | National Review Online



5. The Democrats have used the Department of Justice to make certain that blacks know who their masters are....and to keep them in the fold.

And they even overstep by oppressing the very black voters that keep them in power!!!

"Justice concludes black voters need Democratic Party
KINSTON, N.C. | Voters in this small city decided overwhelmingly last year to do away with the party affiliation of candidates in local elections, but the Obama administration recently overruled the electorate and decided that equal rights for black voters cannot be achieved without the Democratic Party.

The Justice Department’s ruling, ... went so far as to say partisan elections are needed so that black voters can elect their “candidates of choice” - identified by the department as those who are Democrats and almost exclusively black.

.... he city cannot get rid of party affiliations for local elections because that would violate black voters’ right to elect the candidates they want." Justice concludes black voters need Democratic Party - Washington Times


Kinston, North Carolina is a majority black town....it had voted to leave off party designations......But the Obama DoJ order: make sure blacks know who the Democrats are, so they vote for 'em!

ack voters need Democratic Party - Washington Times


Kinston, North Carolina is a majority black town....it had voted to leave off party designations......But the Obama DoJ order: make sure blacks know who the Democrats are, so they vote for 'em!

You have no idea what Wilson was talking about when he said that, do you?

Wilson wouldn't say that today with people like her around. In their version of the Constitution no one would have any rights at all. It would be dog eat dog since can't see beyond their own needs and those close to them.

"Wilson wouldn't say that today with people like her around. "


'Tis a consummation. Devoutly to be wished.'
Hamlet


I glow with pride!

Pride in fascists is to be expected. Carry on...

Try to be more accurate.

Fascism, like communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, and Progressivism, are all permutations of the same worldview.

Yours.

You're becoming repetitive. Wrong and repetitive.

Now, get this straight: I'm never wrong.
I thought I was once, but I was mistaken.

 

[PoliticalChic]

[

Conservatives stand for individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional governance.


.

Individualism? What does that mean? In your own words, in the context of what conservatives 'stand for'.

Her version of Individualism is I Got Mine, **** Everyone Else...

Of course, you are wrong about my views, but your vulgarity gives you away.

Gutter language is a well-known trait of one who recognizes that they've lost the argument. Defaulting to vulgarity proves that your thoughts are no more articulated on this subject than on any other.: a second-rater with a third grader's vocabulary.

That would be exemplified by the dozens of time you referred to me as 'sewage' in your last gasp of a lost argument.

That would be 'sack of sewage.'

 

[NYcarbineer]

[

Conservatives stand for individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional governance.


.

Individualism? What does that mean? In your own words, in the context of what conservatives 'stand for'.

Can some of you help PC out here? She appears to have stumped herself.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Wilson wouldn't say that today with people like her around. In their version of the Constitution no one would have any rights at all. It would be dog eat dog since can't see beyond their own needs and those close to them.

"Wilson wouldn't say that today with people like her around. "


'Tis a consummation. Devoutly to be wished.'
Hamlet


I glow with pride!

Pride in fascists is to be expected. Carry on...

Try to be more accurate.

Fascism, like communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, and Progressivism, are all permutations of the same worldview.

Yours.

I'm being entirely accurate. You are a fascist, and not even an American in name only.

As to the above, total nonsense, as usual.

Quite the pattern we are setting.....

You attempt to lie, I reveal same.

OK....let's do that:

...let's smack you in the kisser one more time:
I stated, correctly, that communism, socialism, Nazism, Liberalism, Progressivism...are all 'fruit of the same poison tree.'

Deny it?

Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:


Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life

9. Which restricts free speech and thought?

10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”



And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.

Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.


In your face, you dolt.....
...You're so dense that light bends around you.


Don't ever change.

Liberals support a democratically elected government carrying out the will of the People.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Wilson wouldn't say that today with people like her around. In their version of the Constitution no one would have any rights at all. It would be dog eat dog since can't see beyond their own needs and those close to them.

"Wilson wouldn't say that today with people like her around. "


'Tis a consummation. Devoutly to be wished.'
Hamlet


I glow with pride!

Pride in fascists is to be expected. Carry on...

Try to be more accurate.

Fascism, like communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, and Progressivism, are all permutations of the same worldview.

Yours.

I'm being entirely accurate. You are a fascist, and not even an American in name only.

As to the above, total nonsense, as usual.

Quite the pattern we are setting.....

You attempt to lie, I reveal same.

OK....let's do that:

...let's smack you in the kisser one more time:
I stated, correctly, that communism, socialism, Nazism, Liberalism, Progressivism...are all 'fruit of the same poison tree.'

Deny it?

Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:


Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life

9. Which restricts free speech and thought?

10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”



And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.

Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.


In your face, you dolt.....
...You're so dense that light bends around you.


Don't ever change.

"Liberalism, political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual to be the central problem of politics. Liberals typically believe that government is necessary to protect individuals from being harmed by others; but they also recognize that government itself can pose a threat to liberty. As the revolutionary American pamphleteer Thomas Paine expressed it in “Common Sense” (1776), government is at best “a necessary evil.” Laws, judges, and police are needed to secure the individual’s life and liberty, but their coercive power may also be turned against him. The problem, then, is to devise a system that gives government the power necessary to protect individual liberty but also prevents those who govern from abusing that power."
liberalism | politics

 

[NYcarbineer]

[

Conservatives stand for individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional governance.


.

Individualism? What does that mean? In your own words, in the context of what conservatives 'stand for'.

Her version of Individualism is I Got Mine, **** Everyone Else...

Of course, you are wrong about my views, but your vulgarity gives you away.

Gutter language is a well-known trait of one who recognizes that they've lost the argument. Defaulting to vulgarity proves that your thoughts are no more articulated on this subject than on any other.: a second-rater with a third grader's vocabulary.

That would be exemplified by the dozens of time you referred to me as 'sewage' in your last gasp of a lost argument.

That would be 'sack of sewage.'

Thus proving my point. Gutter language is a well-known trait of one who recognizes they've lost the argument.

Oh wait...

...that was your point.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Of course, you are wrong about my views, but your vulgarity gives you away.

You don't have views, that's why you must cut and paste the views of others, which you do not understand.

And only children worry about adults swearing. Grow up.

As soon as you default to the method I choose to provide facts, cut and paste, you reveal you cannot confront the truth.

It's amusing that you put your foot in your mouth again.....if I have no views, are you contending that I choose the quoted and examples that I post at random?

Pretty funny, huh?

 

[NYcarbineer]

"Wilson wouldn't say that today with people like her around. "


'Tis a consummation. Devoutly to be wished.'
Hamlet


I glow with pride!

Pride in fascists is to be expected. Carry on...

Try to be more accurate.

Fascism, like communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, and Progressivism, are all permutations of the same worldview.

Yours.

I'm being entirely accurate. You are a fascist, and not even an American in name only.

As to the above, total nonsense, as usual.

Quite the pattern we are setting.....

You attempt to lie, I reveal same.

OK....let's do that:

...let's smack you in the kisser one more time:
I stated, correctly, that communism, socialism, Nazism, Liberalism, Progressivism...are all 'fruit of the same poison tree.'

Deny it?

Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:


Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life

9. Which restricts free speech and thought?

10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”



And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.

Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.


In your face, you dolt.....
...You're so dense that light bends around you.


Don't ever change.

"Liberalism, political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual to be the central problem of politics. Liberals typically believe that government is necessary to protect individuals from being harmed by others; but they also recognize that government itself can pose a threat to liberty. As the revolutionary American pamphleteer Thomas Paine expressed it in “Common Sense” (1776), government is at best “a necessary evil.” Laws, judges, and police are needed to secure the individual’s life and liberty, but their coercive power may also be turned against him. The problem, then, is to devise a system that gives government the power necessary to protect individual liberty but also prevents those who govern from abusing that power."
liberalism | politics

PC thinks winning elections is an exercise of tyranny. It's common amongst the conservative minority that cannot accept the fact that when the People decide,

conservatism loses.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Of course, you are wrong about my views, but your vulgarity gives you away.

You don't have views, that's why you must cut and paste the views of others, which you do not understand.

And only children worry about adults swearing. Grow up.

As soon as you default to the method I choose to provide facts, cut and paste, you reveal you cannot confront the truth.

Projection. As a Korean you will never understand who founded this nation, using what ideology, for whom, and why...

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Exactly how does this major polical power extant today, attempt to strangle liberty?

Politicizing thought.

Criminalizing speech.

This is done, directly, through the misnamed Department of Justice.




2. Michael B. Mukasey, who served as the Attorney General of the United States from 2007-2009, and as a U.S. district judge for the Southern District of New York from 1988-2006, and as an assistant U.S. attorney for that same district from 1972-1976, said this:

"The DOJ’s Civil Rights Division is the one we think of as having the main responsibility for protecting fairness.
Yet its recent record has indicated other priorities."



3. How has this Liberal/Democrat administration corrupted the Department of Justice, so as to keep their party in power?

" One lesson to draw from all this is that personnel is policy. If you examine the resumés of people hired into the DOJ beginning in 2009, you will find that the governing credential of new hires was a history of support for left-leaning causes or membership in leftist organizations. By the time of the 2012 election, it was considered unremarkable for DOJ lawyers to display political posters on their office walls, and even outside their offices—something inimical to the spirit and mission of the Department of Justice."
Justice and the Obama Justice Department - Imprimis | Hillsdale College



a. Let's see what the mission of the DoJ should be:

".... the attorney general is a member of the administration—but his principal responsibility is to provide neutral advice on what the law requires, not to fly in political formation."

Again?
"...provide neutral advice...."
That would be in the real America....not the Progressive corruption it has become.





""Principle is nothing to liberals. Winning is everything."
Coulter

LMAO and spit my coffee on the screen; phew, imagine how the hack who posted this thread would have reacted if she were honest and forthright?

Sense she is not, honest or forthright, (think of Winston's employers at the Ministry of Truth); had she an ounce of integrity she would have directed her ire at Alberto Gonzales and his far right hand religious zealot, Monica Goodling.

Failing to do so gives insight into the character flaws of a narcissist and an egotistical hack.

6. The Kinston decision was made " by the same Justice official who ordered the dismissal of a voting rights case against members of the New Black Panther Party in Philadelphia, ..."


"During the 2008 election, two members of the New Black Panther Party showed up at a polling place in Philadelphia dressed in black battle fatigues, one of them brandishing a nightstick and the other yelling at white voters that they would soon be ruled by a black man. The scene was described in an affidavit by a poll watcher—a veteran civil rights activist who had often supported Democratic candidates—as something he had never seen or heard of in his 40 years of political involvement.

.... the Bush administration, the DOJ’s Voting Section filed a lawsuit and won a default judgment. But in the spring of 2009, after the Obama administration took over, those handling the case were directed to drop it. .... And when the Office of Professional Responsibility looked into the matter, their finding criticized the bringing of the case more than the dropping of it.


Contrast that response with the [Obama] DOJ’s treatment of a 79-year-old protestor outside an abortion clinic who was sued by the Civil Rights Division’s Criminal Section for praying outside the clinic and urging entrants to reconsider abortion. When that protestor was pepper sprayed by an abortion supporter for exercising his First Amendment rights, the Criminal Section did nothing." Justice and the Obama Justice Department - Imprimis | Hillsdale College

 

[PaintMyHouse]

1. Exactly how does this major polical power extant today, attempt to strangle liberty?

Politicizing thought.

Criminalizing speech.

This is done, directly, through the misnamed Department of Justice.




2. Michael B. Mukasey, who served as the Attorney General of the United States from 2007-2009, and as a U.S. district judge for the Southern District of New York from 1988-2006, and as an assistant U.S. attorney for that same district from 1972-1976, said this:

"The DOJ’s Civil Rights Division is the one we think of as having the main responsibility for protecting fairness.
Yet its recent record has indicated other priorities."



3. How has this Liberal/Democrat administration corrupted the Department of Justice, so as to keep their party in power?

" One lesson to draw from all this is that personnel is policy. If you examine the resumés of people hired into the DOJ beginning in 2009, you will find that the governing credential of new hires was a history of support for left-leaning causes or membership in leftist organizations. By the time of the 2012 election, it was considered unremarkable for DOJ lawyers to display political posters on their office walls, and even outside their offices—something inimical to the spirit and mission of the Department of Justice."
Justice and the Obama Justice Department - Imprimis | Hillsdale College



a. Let's see what the mission of the DoJ should be:

".... the attorney general is a member of the administration—but his principal responsibility is to provide neutral advice on what the law requires, not to fly in political formation."

Again?
"...provide neutral advice...."
That would be in the real America....not the Progressive corruption it has become.





""Principle is nothing to liberals. Winning is everything."
Coulter

LMAO and spit my coffee on the screen; phew, imagine how the hack who posted this thread would have reacted if she were honest and forthright?

Sense she is not, honest or forthright, (think of Winston's employers at the Ministry of Truth); had she an ounce of integrity she would have directed her ire at Alberto Gonzales and his far right hand religious zealot, Monica Goodling.

Failing to do so gives insight into the character flaws of a narcissist and an egotistical hack.

6. The Kinston decision was made " by the same Justice official who ordered the dismissal of a voting rights case against members of the New Black Panther Party in Philadelphia, ..."


"During the 2008 election, two members of the New Black Panther Party showed up at a polling place in Philadelphia dressed in black battle fatigues, one of them brandishing a nightstick and the other yelling at white voters that they would soon be ruled by a black man. The scene was described in an affidavit by a poll watcher—a veteran civil rights activist who had often supported Democratic candidates—as something he had never seen or heard of in his 40 years of political involvement.

.... the Bush administration, the DOJ’s Voting Section filed a lawsuit and won a default judgment. But in the spring of 2009, after the Obama administration took over, those handling the case were directed to drop it. .... And when the Office of Professional Responsibility looked into the matter, their finding criticized the bringing of the case more than the dropping of it.


Contrast that response with the [Obama] DOJ’s treatment of a 79-year-old protestor outside an abortion clinic who was sued by the Civil Rights Division’s Criminal Section for praying outside the clinic and urging entrants to reconsider abortion. When that protestor was pepper sprayed by an abortion supporter for exercising his First Amendment rights, the Criminal Section did nothing." Justice and the Obama Justice Department - Imprimis | Hillsdale College

People in other nations die trying to vote. If you can't deal with two loudmouthed ******* shouting, don't bother.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Pride in fascists is to be expected. Carry on...

Try to be more accurate.

Fascism, like communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, and Progressivism, are all permutations of the same worldview.

Yours.

I'm being entirely accurate. You are a fascist, and not even an American in name only.

As to the above, total nonsense, as usual.

Quite the pattern we are setting.....

You attempt to lie, I reveal same.

OK....let's do that:

...let's smack you in the kisser one more time:
I stated, correctly, that communism, socialism, Nazism, Liberalism, Progressivism...are all 'fruit of the same poison tree.'

Deny it?

Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:


Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life

9. Which restricts free speech and thought?

10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”



And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.

Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.


In your face, you dolt.....
...You're so dense that light bends around you.


Don't ever change.

"Liberalism, political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual to be the central problem of politics. Liberals typically believe that government is necessary to protect individuals from being harmed by others; but they also recognize that government itself can pose a threat to liberty. As the revolutionary American pamphleteer Thomas Paine expressed it in “Common Sense” (1776), government is at best “a necessary evil.” Laws, judges, and police are needed to secure the individual’s life and liberty, but their coercive power may also be turned against him. The problem, then, is to devise a system that gives government the power necessary to protect individual liberty but also prevents those who govern from abusing that power."
liberalism | politics

PC thinks winning elections is an exercise of tyranny. It's common amongst the conservative minority that cannot accept the fact that when the People decide,

conservatism loses.

OK...I see you have another glaring misunderstanding of reality, and the political realm:
No democracy is possible without an unbiased press. That is the reason for the first amendment.

1. The National Socialists, the Nazis, understood this, and hailed Roosevelt's ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:
   1. May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
   2. And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
   3. And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his [Roosevelt's] book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
   4. The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”

This is the explanation of 65 million Americans voting for the failure currently in the White House.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Below is a short list of Liberal positions and how they are viewed by the public overall, and by conservatives:

Most Americans support Social Security. Conservatives don't
Most Americans support Medicare. Conservatives don't
Most Americans support choice on abortion. Conservatives don't
Most Americans support programs for the poor. Conservatives don't
Most Americans support expanding background checks. Conservatives don't
Most Americans support raising the minimum wage. Conservatives don't.
Most Americans support birthright citizenship. Conservatives don't.
Most Americans support same sex marriage. Conservatives don't.
Most Americans support a pathway to citizenship or legal residency for illegals. Conservatives don't
Most Americans support labor unions. Conservatives don't.
Most Americans support Planned Parenthood. Conservatives don't.

ah, that's enough for now.

But consider this, why would Liberals care about having dictatorial powers when Liberals already have the People on their side?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Try to be more accurate.

Fascism, like communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, and Progressivism, are all permutations of the same worldview.

Yours.

I'm being entirely accurate. You are a fascist, and not even an American in name only.

As to the above, total nonsense, as usual.

Quite the pattern we are setting.....

You attempt to lie, I reveal same.

OK....let's do that:

...let's smack you in the kisser one more time:
I stated, correctly, that communism, socialism, Nazism, Liberalism, Progressivism...are all 'fruit of the same poison tree.'

Deny it?

Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:


Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life

9. Which restricts free speech and thought?

10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”



And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.

Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.


In your face, you dolt.....
...You're so dense that light bends around you.


Don't ever change.

"Liberalism, political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual to be the central problem of politics. Liberals typically believe that government is necessary to protect individuals from being harmed by others; but they also recognize that government itself can pose a threat to liberty. As the revolutionary American pamphleteer Thomas Paine expressed it in “Common Sense” (1776), government is at best “a necessary evil.” Laws, judges, and police are needed to secure the individual’s life and liberty, but their coercive power may also be turned against him. The problem, then, is to devise a system that gives government the power necessary to protect individual liberty but also prevents those who govern from abusing that power."
liberalism | politics

PC thinks winning elections is an exercise of tyranny. It's common amongst the conservative minority that cannot accept the fact that when the People decide,

conservatism loses.

OK...I see you have another glaring misunderstanding of reality, and the political realm:
No democracy is possible without an unbiased press. That is the reason for the first amendment.

1. The National Socialists, the Nazis, understood this, and hailed Roosevelt's ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:
   1. May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
   2. And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
   3. And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
   4. The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”

This is the explanation of 65 million Americans voting for the failure currently in the White House.

Learn how the real world works...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

But consider this, why would Liberals care about having dictatorial powers when Liberals already have the People on their side?

Well it's easier of course, but hardly necessary since we win in the end anyway.