Throwing Under The Bus Is The Least Of It

[PoliticalChic]

Evil is in their DNA.

In their lust for power, nothing is beneath the Democrats




Here are the two rules that are hermeneutic with respect to understanding Democrats:

Rule #1Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.

Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

An example of rule #2 follows.





1. "As we continue to celebrate the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, it seems rather fitting that a video from a 2017 weekly presser is making the rounds. It shows House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) explaining to the assembled press what a “wrap-up smear” is and how it can be used to harm political opponents.


2. It reads like a template for the base and unfounded attacks on Justice Kavanaugh during—and after—his confirmation hearings.


3. Pelosi: They [Republicans] don’t want them [voters] to see that contrast, so they focus on something else. It’s a diversionary tactic. It’s a self-fulfilling prophesy, you demonize and then [trails off]. We call it the wrap-up smear. . . . You smear somebody with falsehoods and all the rest and then you merchandise it.

4. And then you [speaking to the press] write it, and they’ll say, see it’s reported in the press . . . so they have that validation that the press reported the smear, and then it’s called the ‘wrap-up smear.’ And now I’m going to merchandize the press’s report on the smear that we made. [Shrugging and smirking] It’s a tactic. And it’s, it’s self-evident.



5. Let’s review:

Demonize Kavanaugh, check.
Smear somebody with falsehoods “and all the rest,” check.
Merchandize falsehoods-based smear, check.
Get press to report falsehoods-based smear, check.
Merchandize “validation” of press reports on falsehoods-based smear, check.

6. Here’s the clip:



Pelosi's "wrap-up smear" reads like template for Democrat attacks on Kavanaugh

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[OldLady]

Evil is in their DNA.

In their lust for power, nothing is beneath the Democrats




Here are the two rules that are hermeneutic with respect to understanding Democrats:

Rule #1Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.

Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

An example of rule #2 follows.





1. "As we continue to celebrate the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, it seems rather fitting that a video from a 2017 weekly presser is making the rounds. It shows House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) explaining to the assembled press what a “wrap-up smear” is and how it can be used to harm political opponents.


2. It reads like a template for the base and unfounded attacks on Justice Kavanaugh during—and after—his confirmation hearings.


3. Pelosi: They [Republicans] don’t want them [voters] to see that contrast, so they focus on something else. It’s a diversionary tactic. It’s a self-fulfilling prophesy, you demonize and then [trails off]. We call it the wrap-up smear. . . . You smear somebody with falsehoods and all the rest and then you merchandise it.

4. And then you [speaking to the press] write it, and they’ll say, see it’s reported in the press . . . so they have that validation that the press reported the smear, and then it’s called the ‘wrap-up smear.’ And now I’m going to merchandize the press’s report on the smear that we made. [Shrugging and smirking] It’s a tactic. And it’s, it’s self-evident.



5. Let’s review:

Demonize Kavanaugh, check.
Smear somebody with falsehoods “and all the rest,” check.
Merchandize falsehoods-based smear, check.
Get press to report falsehoods-based smear, check.
Merchandize “validation” of press reports on falsehoods-based smear, check.

6. Here’s the clip:



Pelosi's "wrap-up smear" reads like template for Democrat attacks on Kavanaugh

Just straight up running them over is a lot better.

 

[Polishprince]

The whole Kavanaugh Smear made countless millions for CNN and the rest of the Lamestream Media.

Ms. Ford's media circus drew Super Bowl like numbers for the failing leader in Fake News.

If you follow the money, you can see where the lies originated, right in the media, and directly from Soros, the Father of Lies.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Evil is in their DNA.

In their lust for power, nothing is beneath the Democrats




Here are the two rules that are hermeneutic with respect to understanding Democrats:

Rule #1Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.

Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

An example of rule #2 follows.





1. "As we continue to celebrate the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, it seems rather fitting that a video from a 2017 weekly presser is making the rounds. It shows House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) explaining to the assembled press what a “wrap-up smear” is and how it can be used to harm political opponents.


2. It reads like a template for the base and unfounded attacks on Justice Kavanaugh during—and after—his confirmation hearings.


3. Pelosi: They [Republicans] don’t want them [voters] to see that contrast, so they focus on something else. It’s a diversionary tactic. It’s a self-fulfilling prophesy, you demonize and then [trails off]. We call it the wrap-up smear. . . . You smear somebody with falsehoods and all the rest and then you merchandise it.

4. And then you [speaking to the press] write it, and they’ll say, see it’s reported in the press . . . so they have that validation that the press reported the smear, and then it’s called the ‘wrap-up smear.’ And now I’m going to merchandize the press’s report on the smear that we made. [Shrugging and smirking] It’s a tactic. And it’s, it’s self-evident.



5. Let’s review:

Demonize Kavanaugh, check.
Smear somebody with falsehoods “and all the rest,” check.
Merchandize falsehoods-based smear, check.
Get press to report falsehoods-based smear, check.
Merchandize “validation” of press reports on falsehoods-based smear, check.

6. Here’s the clip:



Pelosi's "wrap-up smear" reads like template for Democrat attacks on Kavanaugh

Just straight up running them over is a lot better.

Now, focus like a laser: what does your post have to do with the OP, revealing how slander and smearing good folks is integral in the Democrat playbook?

 

[dudmuck]

Aww, you guys cant take your bullshit being called out.

if the FBI spent only 3 days investigating hilary, you'd have a shitfit.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Evil is in their DNA.

In their lust for power, nothing is beneath the Democrats




Here are the two rules that are hermeneutic with respect to understanding Democrats:

Rule #1Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.

Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

An example of rule #2 follows.





1. "As we continue to celebrate the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, it seems rather fitting that a video from a 2017 weekly presser is making the rounds. It shows House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) explaining to the assembled press what a “wrap-up smear” is and how it can be used to harm political opponents.


2. It reads like a template for the base and unfounded attacks on Justice Kavanaugh during—and after—his confirmation hearings.


3. Pelosi: They [Republicans] don’t want them [voters] to see that contrast, so they focus on something else. It’s a diversionary tactic. It’s a self-fulfilling prophesy, you demonize and then [trails off]. We call it the wrap-up smear. . . . You smear somebody with falsehoods and all the rest and then you merchandise it.

4. And then you [speaking to the press] write it, and they’ll say, see it’s reported in the press . . . so they have that validation that the press reported the smear, and then it’s called the ‘wrap-up smear.’ And now I’m going to merchandize the press’s report on the smear that we made. [Shrugging and smirking] It’s a tactic. And it’s, it’s self-evident.



5. Let’s review:

Demonize Kavanaugh, check.
Smear somebody with falsehoods “and all the rest,” check.
Merchandize falsehoods-based smear, check.
Get press to report falsehoods-based smear, check.
Merchandize “validation” of press reports on falsehoods-based smear, check.

6. Here’s the clip:



Pelosi's "wrap-up smear" reads like template for Democrat attacks on Kavanaugh

Just straight up running them over is a lot better.

The emoticon that you added notwithstanding, I believe we've proven .....yet again.....that you could neither find a way to apply your post to the OP, or to cobble together a cogent response.


Sooo.....you must be a Liberal, huh?

 

[OldLady]

Evil is in their DNA.

In their lust for power, nothing is beneath the Democrats




Here are the two rules that are hermeneutic with respect to understanding Democrats:

Rule #1Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.

Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

An example of rule #2 follows.





1. "As we continue to celebrate the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, it seems rather fitting that a video from a 2017 weekly presser is making the rounds. It shows House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) explaining to the assembled press what a “wrap-up smear” is and how it can be used to harm political opponents.


2. It reads like a template for the base and unfounded attacks on Justice Kavanaugh during—and after—his confirmation hearings.


3. Pelosi: They [Republicans] don’t want them [voters] to see that contrast, so they focus on something else. It’s a diversionary tactic. It’s a self-fulfilling prophesy, you demonize and then [trails off]. We call it the wrap-up smear. . . . You smear somebody with falsehoods and all the rest and then you merchandise it.

4. And then you [speaking to the press] write it, and they’ll say, see it’s reported in the press . . . so they have that validation that the press reported the smear, and then it’s called the ‘wrap-up smear.’ And now I’m going to merchandize the press’s report on the smear that we made. [Shrugging and smirking] It’s a tactic. And it’s, it’s self-evident.



5. Let’s review:

Demonize Kavanaugh, check.
Smear somebody with falsehoods “and all the rest,” check.
Merchandize falsehoods-based smear, check.
Get press to report falsehoods-based smear, check.
Merchandize “validation” of press reports on falsehoods-based smear, check.

6. Here’s the clip:



Pelosi's "wrap-up smear" reads like template for Democrat attacks on Kavanaugh

Just straight up running them over is a lot better.

Now, focus like a laser: what does your post have to do with the OP, revealing how slander and smearing good folks is integral in the Democrat playbook?

I already told everyone that I don't believe it was a manufactured lie. The Democrats had understandable concerns about those allegations. Believing that everything you don't want to hear is a lie is an extremely dangerous habit, and I am truly afraid for what will become of this country now that so many are indulging in that.

 

[OldLady]

Evil is in their DNA.

In their lust for power, nothing is beneath the Democrats




Here are the two rules that are hermeneutic with respect to understanding Democrats:

Rule #1Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.

Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

An example of rule #2 follows.





1. "As we continue to celebrate the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, it seems rather fitting that a video from a 2017 weekly presser is making the rounds. It shows House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) explaining to the assembled press what a “wrap-up smear” is and how it can be used to harm political opponents.


2. It reads like a template for the base and unfounded attacks on Justice Kavanaugh during—and after—his confirmation hearings.


3. Pelosi: They [Republicans] don’t want them [voters] to see that contrast, so they focus on something else. It’s a diversionary tactic. It’s a self-fulfilling prophesy, you demonize and then [trails off]. We call it the wrap-up smear. . . . You smear somebody with falsehoods and all the rest and then you merchandise it.

4. And then you [speaking to the press] write it, and they’ll say, see it’s reported in the press . . . so they have that validation that the press reported the smear, and then it’s called the ‘wrap-up smear.’ And now I’m going to merchandize the press’s report on the smear that we made. [Shrugging and smirking] It’s a tactic. And it’s, it’s self-evident.



5. Let’s review:

Demonize Kavanaugh, check.
Smear somebody with falsehoods “and all the rest,” check.
Merchandize falsehoods-based smear, check.
Get press to report falsehoods-based smear, check.
Merchandize “validation” of press reports on falsehoods-based smear, check.

6. Here’s the clip:



Pelosi's "wrap-up smear" reads like template for Democrat attacks on Kavanaugh

Just straight up running them over is a lot better.

The emoticon that you added notwithstanding, I believe we've proven .....yet again.....that you could neither find a way to apply your post to the OP, or to cobble together a cogent response.


Sooo.....you must be a Liberal, huh?

I gave you a funny because "focus like a laser" was cute. I don't use funnies to mock.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Evil is in their DNA.

In their lust for power, nothing is beneath the Democrats




Here are the two rules that are hermeneutic with respect to understanding Democrats:

Rule #1Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.

Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

An example of rule #2 follows.





1. "As we continue to celebrate the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, it seems rather fitting that a video from a 2017 weekly presser is making the rounds. It shows House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) explaining to the assembled press what a “wrap-up smear” is and how it can be used to harm political opponents.


2. It reads like a template for the base and unfounded attacks on Justice Kavanaugh during—and after—his confirmation hearings.


3. Pelosi: They [Republicans] don’t want them [voters] to see that contrast, so they focus on something else. It’s a diversionary tactic. It’s a self-fulfilling prophesy, you demonize and then [trails off]. We call it the wrap-up smear. . . . You smear somebody with falsehoods and all the rest and then you merchandise it.

4. And then you [speaking to the press] write it, and they’ll say, see it’s reported in the press . . . so they have that validation that the press reported the smear, and then it’s called the ‘wrap-up smear.’ And now I’m going to merchandize the press’s report on the smear that we made. [Shrugging and smirking] It’s a tactic. And it’s, it’s self-evident.



5. Let’s review:

Demonize Kavanaugh, check.
Smear somebody with falsehoods “and all the rest,” check.
Merchandize falsehoods-based smear, check.
Get press to report falsehoods-based smear, check.
Merchandize “validation” of press reports on falsehoods-based smear, check.

6. Here’s the clip:



Pelosi's "wrap-up smear" reads like template for Democrat attacks on Kavanaugh

Just straight up running them over is a lot better.

Now, focus like a laser: what does your post have to do with the OP, revealing how slander and smearing good folks is integral in the Democrat playbook?

I already told everyone that I don't believe it was a manufactured lie. The Democrats had understandable concerns about those allegations. Believing that everything you don't want to hear is a lie is an extremely dangerous habit, and I am truly afraid for what will become of this country now that so many are indulging in that.

"I already told everyone that I don't believe it was a manufactured lie. "

You mean you've already revealed that you are a fool.

Granted.


The 'Doctor' named four witnesses....all of whom denied being there or even knowing Kavanaugh.


You certainly must be in great demand by Lib lawyers for their juries.



Ford's a sick woman...her mental instability on display

... a fifteen year old Christine Blasey, who didn’t travel in the same social circles with Brett Kavanaugh, saw from afar, a handsome, older boy who was an accomplished athletic hero as well as an academic star, at exactly the time her hormones were kicking in.

Kavanaugh was well out of her league.

Perhaps the term to be used would be Morganatic…..as in Morganatic marriage, as in a marriage between people of unequal social rank.



For most normal folks, while the above certainly could have occurred,….we call it ‘a crush.’

Most get over them…..not so with one predisposed to a mental imbalance, a “Fatal Attraction” syndrome.





“Ford, who also has received threats, is by all accounts a respected scientific researcher in the field of psychology with an impressive pedigree.”
https://nypost.com/2018/09/25/eight-big-problems-for-christine-blasey-fords-story/

“ …..psychologists suffering from psychological problems, including neurosis, superstitions, and thoughts of suicide is quite a common thing. It also goes on to describe how psychologists are just as troubled as the general population.”
https://www.quora.com/Do-psychologists-have-their-own-problems




The little-girl-voice that Dr Ford assumed is a give-away.

The hurt of her imaginary rejection by Kavanaugh at her most formative age, and the obsession that developed as a result, has been put to use by the Democrats……


…and now, her usefulness at an end, today’s Cindy Sheehan, they will throw Ford into the waste bin.




Ford is a sick woman....

Not as sick as you are, but, sick nonetheless.



Earlier in thread, I posited that Dr Ford purposely testified in a childish voice.....

"The first hint of illness came when she began to testify in that husky little girl voice…”I’m just a defenseless little waif with no sophistication, unable to defend myself from this wicked, wicked world and this evil, evil man.”

The face and the accomplishments just didn’t go with that voice and the attempt to evince a less-than worldliness."





Here, from HuffPo is an actress imitating same.....and sounding exactly like the fake victim, Ford.
'Star Wars Resistance' Star Rachel Butera Mocks Christine Blasey Ford | HuffPost

 

[OldLady]

Evil is in their DNA.

In their lust for power, nothing is beneath the Democrats




Here are the two rules that are hermeneutic with respect to understanding Democrats:

Rule #1Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.

Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

An example of rule #2 follows.





1. "As we continue to celebrate the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, it seems rather fitting that a video from a 2017 weekly presser is making the rounds. It shows House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) explaining to the assembled press what a “wrap-up smear” is and how it can be used to harm political opponents.


2. It reads like a template for the base and unfounded attacks on Justice Kavanaugh during—and after—his confirmation hearings.


3. Pelosi: They [Republicans] don’t want them [voters] to see that contrast, so they focus on something else. It’s a diversionary tactic. It’s a self-fulfilling prophesy, you demonize and then [trails off]. We call it the wrap-up smear. . . . You smear somebody with falsehoods and all the rest and then you merchandise it.

4. And then you [speaking to the press] write it, and they’ll say, see it’s reported in the press . . . so they have that validation that the press reported the smear, and then it’s called the ‘wrap-up smear.’ And now I’m going to merchandize the press’s report on the smear that we made. [Shrugging and smirking] It’s a tactic. And it’s, it’s self-evident.



5. Let’s review:

Demonize Kavanaugh, check.
Smear somebody with falsehoods “and all the rest,” check.
Merchandize falsehoods-based smear, check.
Get press to report falsehoods-based smear, check.
Merchandize “validation” of press reports on falsehoods-based smear, check.

6. Here’s the clip:



Pelosi's "wrap-up smear" reads like template for Democrat attacks on Kavanaugh

Just straight up running them over is a lot better.

Now, focus like a laser: what does your post have to do with the OP, revealing how slander and smearing good folks is integral in the Democrat playbook?

I already told everyone that I don't believe it was a manufactured lie. The Democrats had understandable concerns about those allegations. Believing that everything you don't want to hear is a lie is an extremely dangerous habit, and I am truly afraid for what will become of this country now that so many are indulging in that.

You mean you've already revealed that you are a fool.

Granted.


The 'Doctor' named four witnesses....all of whom denied being there or even knowing Kavanaugh.


You certainly must be in great demand by Lib lawyers for their juries.



Ford's a sick woman...her mental instability on display

... a fifteen year old Christine Blasey, who didn’t travel in the same social circles with Brett Kavanaugh, saw from afar, a handsome, older boy who was an accomplished athletic hero as well as an academic star, at exactly the time her hormones were kicking in.

Kavanaugh was well out of her league.

Perhaps the term to be used would be Morganatic…..as in Morganatic marriage, as in a marriage between people of unequal social rank.



For most normal folks, while the above certainly could have occurred,….we call it ‘a crush.’

Most get over them…..not so with one predisposed to a mental imbalance, a “Fatal Attraction” syndrome.





“Ford, who also has received threats, is by all accounts a respected scientific researcher in the field of psychology with an impressive pedigree.”
https://nypost.com/2018/09/25/eight-big-problems-for-christine-blasey-fords-story/

“ …..psychologists suffering from psychological problems, including neurosis, superstitions, and thoughts of suicide is quite a common thing. It also goes on to describe how psychologists are just as troubled as the general population.”
https://www.quora.com/Do-psychologists-have-their-own-problems




The little-girl-voice that Dr Ford assumed is a give-away.

The hurt of her imaginary rejection by Kavanaugh at her most formative age, and the obsession that developed as a result, has been put to use by the Democrats……


…and now, her usefulness at an end, today’s Cindy Sheehan, they will throw Ford into the waste bin.




Ford is a sick woman....

Not as sick as you are, but, sick nonetheless.



Earlier in thread, I posited that Dr Ford purposely testified in a childish voice.....

"The first hint of illness came when she began to testify in that husky little girl voice…”I’m just a defenseless little waif with no sophistication, unable to defend myself from this wicked, wicked world and this evil, evil man.”

The face and the accomplishments just didn’t go with that voice and the attempt to evince a less-than worldliness."





Here, from HuffPo is an actress imitating same.....and sounding exactly like the fake victim, Ford.
'Star Wars Resistance' Star Rachel Butera Mocks Christine Blasey Ford | HuffPost

Political Chic, how many times are you going to run that article diagnosing Ford via television set? Seems to me you didn't like that so much when everyone with eyes and ears was calling Trump a narcissist.

Saying it a hundred times doesn't make it so, ya know.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Evil is in their DNA.

In their lust for power, nothing is beneath the Democrats




Here are the two rules that are hermeneutic with respect to understanding Democrats:

Rule #1Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.

Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

An example of rule #2 follows.





1. "As we continue to celebrate the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, it seems rather fitting that a video from a 2017 weekly presser is making the rounds. It shows House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) explaining to the assembled press what a “wrap-up smear” is and how it can be used to harm political opponents.


2. It reads like a template for the base and unfounded attacks on Justice Kavanaugh during—and after—his confirmation hearings.


3. Pelosi: They [Republicans] don’t want them [voters] to see that contrast, so they focus on something else. It’s a diversionary tactic. It’s a self-fulfilling prophesy, you demonize and then [trails off]. We call it the wrap-up smear. . . . You smear somebody with falsehoods and all the rest and then you merchandise it.

4. And then you [speaking to the press] write it, and they’ll say, see it’s reported in the press . . . so they have that validation that the press reported the smear, and then it’s called the ‘wrap-up smear.’ And now I’m going to merchandize the press’s report on the smear that we made. [Shrugging and smirking] It’s a tactic. And it’s, it’s self-evident.



5. Let’s review:

Demonize Kavanaugh, check.
Smear somebody with falsehoods “and all the rest,” check.
Merchandize falsehoods-based smear, check.
Get press to report falsehoods-based smear, check.
Merchandize “validation” of press reports on falsehoods-based smear, check.

6. Here’s the clip:



Pelosi's "wrap-up smear" reads like template for Democrat attacks on Kavanaugh

Just straight up running them over is a lot better.

Now, focus like a laser: what does your post have to do with the OP, revealing how slander and smearing good folks is integral in the Democrat playbook?

I already told everyone that I don't believe it was a manufactured lie. The Democrats had understandable concerns about those allegations. Believing that everything you don't want to hear is a lie is an extremely dangerous habit, and I am truly afraid for what will become of this country now that so many are indulging in that.

You mean you've already revealed that you are a fool.

Granted.


The 'Doctor' named four witnesses....all of whom denied being there or even knowing Kavanaugh.


You certainly must be in great demand by Lib lawyers for their juries.



Ford's a sick woman...her mental instability on display

... a fifteen year old Christine Blasey, who didn’t travel in the same social circles with Brett Kavanaugh, saw from afar, a handsome, older boy who was an accomplished athletic hero as well as an academic star, at exactly the time her hormones were kicking in.

Kavanaugh was well out of her league.

Perhaps the term to be used would be Morganatic…..as in Morganatic marriage, as in a marriage between people of unequal social rank.



For most normal folks, while the above certainly could have occurred,….we call it ‘a crush.’

Most get over them…..not so with one predisposed to a mental imbalance, a “Fatal Attraction” syndrome.





“Ford, who also has received threats, is by all accounts a respected scientific researcher in the field of psychology with an impressive pedigree.”
https://nypost.com/2018/09/25/eight-big-problems-for-christine-blasey-fords-story/

“ …..psychologists suffering from psychological problems, including neurosis, superstitions, and thoughts of suicide is quite a common thing. It also goes on to describe how psychologists are just as troubled as the general population.”
https://www.quora.com/Do-psychologists-have-their-own-problems




The little-girl-voice that Dr Ford assumed is a give-away.

The hurt of her imaginary rejection by Kavanaugh at her most formative age, and the obsession that developed as a result, has been put to use by the Democrats……


…and now, her usefulness at an end, today’s Cindy Sheehan, they will throw Ford into the waste bin.




Ford is a sick woman....

Not as sick as you are, but, sick nonetheless.



Earlier in thread, I posited that Dr Ford purposely testified in a childish voice.....

"The first hint of illness came when she began to testify in that husky little girl voice…”I’m just a defenseless little waif with no sophistication, unable to defend myself from this wicked, wicked world and this evil, evil man.”

The face and the accomplishments just didn’t go with that voice and the attempt to evince a less-than worldliness."





Here, from HuffPo is an actress imitating same.....and sounding exactly like the fake victim, Ford.
'Star Wars Resistance' Star Rachel Butera Mocks Christine Blasey Ford | HuffPost

Political Chic, how many times are you going to run that article diagnosing Ford via television set? Seems to me you didn't like that so much when everyone with eyes and ears was calling Trump a narcissist.

Saying it a hundred times doesn't make it so, ya know.

It seems you'd rather ignore this: The 'Doctor' named four witnesses....all of whom denied being there or even knowing Kavanaugh.

You prove on a daily basis that you have no ability to judge truth and reality.
Seems a dominant characteristic in Liberals.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Evil is in their DNA.
In their lust for power, nothing is beneath the Democrats

This actually appeared in the Liberal's house organ, the NYTimes....


"These women are gender traitors, to borrow a term from the dystopian TV series “The Handmaid’s Tale.” They’ve made standing by the patriarchy a full-time job. The women who support them show up at the Capitol wearing “Women for Kavanaugh” T-shirts, but also probably tell their daughters to put on less revealing clothes when they go out."
Opinion | White Women, Come Get Your People


Wait....WHAT????????

Evil white women who were insightful enough to see Dr Ford as either a liar, or a mental deficient, did the unthinkable thing of telling their daughters not to go to school in bra and panties????????




I certainly didn't coin it, but I believe I just showed that Liberalism is truly a mental disorder.

 

[jwoodie]

if the FBI spent only 3 days investigating hilary, you'd have a shitfit.

That's all they would have needed if it was a real investigation.

 

[PoliticalChic]

We were warned!!!!

"Women’s March Warns ‘Women Will Die’ at Kavanaugh Hearing.
The Women’s March is objecting to Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh because his confirmation to the court will make women “die.” The problem is, they already are dying."
Women’s March Warns ‘Women Will Die’ at Kavanaugh Hearing. But They Already Are.



"Death Toll From Kavanaugh's First Week On Supreme Court Tops 330 Million
WASHINGTON, D.C.—The death toll from Justice Brett Kavanaugh's first week on the Supreme Court has just topped 330 million, a report from the CDC indicated Friday.


As soon as the man was sworn in, millions perished instantly, and the deaths continued to ramp up throughout the week.

"Women are particularly affected," said a CDC official. "We advise you to hide in your homes because there is no telling whom Kavanaugh is going to kill next, nor is there a cure. God help us all."

On Monday morning, Kavanaugh strolled into the Supreme Court building through a line of protesters dressed as characters from The Handmaid's Tale. He glanced in their direction and instantly burned them all to a crisp.

"Hold your loved ones close, wish them goodbye, watch The Handmaid's Tale on Hulu while you still can because y'all are goners," the official added.

Editor's note: this article was published posthumously, as the writer has since died of a sudden case of Justice Kavanaugh."
Death Toll From Kavanaugh's First Week On Supreme Court Tops 330 Million



If only we had listened!!!!!