Those of you against destruction of the drug-hauling boats... question...

These are middle school boys beating up on the smaller kids to feel a little better about themselves.

Trump is trying to get something out of Maduro. That's what this is all about.

And the rubes believe the line that it's about drugs.

God damn. I hope we can be a serious country again one day. What a fuckin' embarrassment.
Get your propaganda shills to abandon their agendas, and there can be negotiations. We should attack Somalia also just to spite you. This is transitioning into the era of the warrior now. The intellectuals have screwed things up. Look at the massive resources spent on Ukraine. Which means nothing to us.
 
Get your propaganda shills to abandon their agendas, and there can be negotiations. We should attack Somalia also just to spite you. This is transitioning into the era of the warrior now.
^^^ The rest of the world is going Artificial Intelligence and Quantum, while MAGA is going full caveman.

And they're PROUD of it.
 
Let's say several missiles were launched against the USA that contained drugs that could kill millions of Americans.
Would you still be against shooting down the missiles?
It depends. Would those missiles hit populated areas or land in the desert or the sea?
 
Everything you were taught specifically forbid attacking civilian non-combatants, and speaks directly to protection of shipwrecked sailers, same as international law, the DOD manual on Rules of war specifically says it is illegal to fire upon survivors in the water, with no means of defense or ability to carry on the battle. You are either simply a stupid partisan pawn, or turned your back on everything you believed while in uniform. You truly suck, you lousy turncoat. Civilian partisans may not know any better out of simple ignorance, but you are a cur, to cowardly to stand for what you once were trained to believe in, values degraded to that of an animal.
Narco terrorists shipping lethal drugs that kill Americans are not civilian non combatants. They are drug dealing killers
 
It depends. Would those missiles hit populated areas or land in the desert or the sea?
What a truly ignorant comment which illustrates people of your ilk's intelligence!
Obviously why would any person in charge, waste an asset knocking out a missile that will be doing no harm?
GEEZ what a waste of my time answering dumb ass comments like yours!
 
Lets say Trump pardons the biggest drug lord in the hemisphere, and profits from it.

Would you still be against impeaching him?
Why wasn't then this president impeached for this ?
Roosevelt, Churchill AND the Dictator that killed:" Estimates of the total number of people killed under Joseph Stalin's rule vary widely, with modern scholarly consensus based on declassified Soviet archives generally placing the figure between 6 and 20 million people. Some earlier, non-archival estimates went as high as 60 million"
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2025-12-08 at 7.42.38 AM.webp
    Screen Shot 2025-12-08 at 7.42.38 AM.webp
    20.6 KB · Views: 7
^^^ The rest of the world is going Artificial Intelligence and Quantum, while MAGA is going full caveman.

And they're PROUD of it.
Weird, because it's the Dems that are opposing AI

Democrats Must Oppose the AI Industry​

 
Oh' well.
What did you expect from the gullible?
They bought the hats.
The irony is strong in you.

How can anyone be so gullible to believe men can get pregnant and that America is such a racist country that millions of illegals are flocking here to expose themselves to all of the extreme racism.

G7fRUclXgAAmydI.webp
G7grj_maMAACifZ.webp
 
No, the precedent is you don't go around murdering people without a congressional authorization.

We had one in Yemen as part of the War on Terror.

We don't have one in the Carribean to blow up fishing boats.
Um, since they have been designated a terrorist group this falls under the war on terror, moron.

How stupid are you?
 
He has congressional authorization.

Chucky Schumer actually voted for the authorization.

"A boat in international waters that is not running a national flag is categorized in international law the same way a pirate is. Such boats have absolutely no national or international protections, and you cannot commit a war crime against them.A vessel in international waters is required under UNCLOS to sail under the flag of a specific nation. If it does not, it is legally considered a stateless vessel. A stateless vessel has no right to the protections normally afforded to ships under a national flag, including immunity from interference by other states.UNCLOS Articles 92, 94, 110, and customary maritime law spell out the consequences clearly:1. Stateless vessels have no sovereign protection. A flagged ship is an extension of its flag-state’s sovereignty. A stateless vessel is not. This matters because “war crimes” presuppose protected persons or protected property. A stateless vessel is legally unprotected.2. Any state may stop, board, search, seize, or disable, a stateless vessel. UNCLOS Article 110 explicitly authorizes boarding and seizure. The law does not require states to risk their own personnel or assets while doing so. Disabling a vessel that refuses inspection, including firing on it, is legally permitted under both UNCLOS and long-established state practice.3. War crimes require an armed conflict. You cannot commit a “war crime” outside an armed conflict. War crimes occur only within the context of international humanitarian law (IHL). Enforcing maritime law against a stateless vessel is a law enforcement action, not an IHL situation.No armed conflict = no war crime possible.4. Lethal force may be used when a vessel refuses lawful orders. The International Maritime Organization’s “Use of Force” guidance for maritime interdiction recognizes that disabling fire, even lethal force, is lawful when a vessel refuses lawful boarding, attempts to flee, poses a threat, or engages in illicit activities such as piracy or narcotics trafficking.Once again: law enforcement rules apply, not IHL.5. Sinking a stateless vessel is not prohibited by UNCLOS. UNCLOS permits seizure of a stateless vessel and leaves the means entirely to the enforcing state so long as necessity and proportionality are respected. If the vessel flees, attacks, or refuses lawful commands, sinking it is legally permissible. Many states routinely do this to drug-smuggling vessels (e.g., semi-submersibles) without it ever being treated as a war crime.6. No flag = no jurisdictional shield. The entire reason international law requires ships to fly a flag is to prevent this exact situation. Flagless vessels are legally vulnerable by design.Because a stateless vessel has no protected status, because UNCLOS authorizes interdiction of such vessels, because lethal force may be used in maritime law enforcement when necessary, and because war crimes require an armed conflict that is not present here, sinking an unflagged ship in international waters is not a war crime."


Image
2:30 PM · Dec 7, 2025·29K Views
David Denend




Well, that just destroyed the entire Dimwinger Cult narrative on this........................again.

How many times has it been destroyed now?















:banana::banana::banana::banana::banana:
 
Doesn't matter what kind of vessel you're sailing in.....you have to fly a flag of origin.

It doesn't matter if it's an aircraft carrier or a dingy sailboat.

You have to fly a flag of origin.

Most speed boats don't do it because they never go outside of territorial waters.
Fancy Nutball has no connection to reality. You are wasting your time.
 
The irony is strong in you.

How can anyone be so gullible to believe men can get pregnant
You're the dumb asses that keep claiming they can.
and that America is such a racist country
They are and have been for decades.
People wouldn't hire the Irish, Italians or Jews, decades ago.
that millions of illegals are flocking here to expose themselves to all of the extreme racism.
Only to work, then they have to put up with your ilk.
 
15th post
Weird, because it's the Dems that are opposing AI

Democrats Must Oppose the AI Industry​

Mac1958 steps on another rake.

What a clown. :auiqs.jpg:


 
What a truly ignorant comment
How would you know? You dropped out of school in the 3rd. grade.
which illustrates people of your ilk's intelligence!
You don't even know who you are, let alone anything about me.
Obviously why would any person in charge, waste an asset knocking out a missile that will be doing no harm?
Talk about an ignorant comment.
GEEZ what a waste of my time answering dumb ass comments like yours!
Then don't waste the oxygen. There are intelligent people who can put it to good use, Bonzo.
 
Dems are trying to use these boatstrikes as a precursor to impeachment proceedings should they get a House majority in the midterms.

Trump has really put a turd in their punch bowl of corruption.

They hate their corruption and STEALING TAXPAYER MONEY has been interfered with.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom