BackAgain
Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
But it wasnāt a liberal court? And it didnāt exist in your lifetime?The Warren Court was over FIFTY years ago and included FIVE Eisenhower appointees
You're a ******* fruitcake

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But it wasnāt a liberal court? And it didnāt exist in your lifetime?The Warren Court was over FIFTY years ago and included FIVE Eisenhower appointees
You're a ******* fruitcake

Over fifty years ago retard...and you're bitching like it was current. By the way...I was 14 when Warren stepped downBut it wasnāt a liberal court? And it didnāt exist in your lifetime?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Youāre the moron who said that there was no liberal court in your lifetime. You retard.Over fifty years ago retard...and you're bitching like it was current. By the way...I was 14 when Warren stepped down
Again...asshole...it had five members appoint by Ike. A RepublicanYouāre the moron who said that there was no liberal court in your lifetime. You retard.![]()
Hey douche bag. Hereās something you havenāt grasped. Not all Republicans are conservatives. The court isnāt generally known as a Democrap Court or a Republican Court. It is known as a conservative court or a liberal court. And thatās what we were discussing.Again....it had five members appoint by Ike. A Republican
And it was 50 years ago. No Court since then could be considered liberal and yet you're whining like they all were
So how was it that a Court with five Conservatives made so many "liberal" decisions?
Because they were the CORRECT decisions...not ideologically driven like this Court
So Which decisions bother you?Hey douche bag. Hereās something you havenāt grasped. Not all Republicans are conservatives. The court isnāt generally known as a Democrap Court or a Republican Court. It is known as a conservative court or a liberal court. And thatās what we were discussing.
And Kennedy appointed what he thought was going to another liberal jurist. Whizzer White. Kennedy was later disappointed that the jurist turned out to be more conservative. Oh well. That also wasnāt a political party topic. It was a political and judicial philosophy issue.
Your libtards arenāt very coherent but at least your efforts to switch the topic is transparent.
I have actually very Recently cited that case to point to the silliness of liberal whining about āsettled law.ā It was a ridiculous complaint.So Which decisions bother you?
Brown V Board?
Glad to hear you favored Brown. I thought for sure that one was what stuck in your craw.I have actually very Recently cited that case to point to the silliness of liberal whining about how āsettled lawā is a ridiculous complaint.
No. I thought Plessy was obviously bad law. And the fact that it was āsettled lawā has no bearing on how much it needed to be overruled. Brown v. Board of Education was a terrific decision. Why? Do you object to it, you schmuck?
Likewise, Roe was an idiotic and legally baseless decision. āSettledā but wrong. Properly overruled.
Besides, thereās no good reason for your effort to change the subject again. Just admit that you were caught being wrong again, and move along.
Again ^ with the cheesedick effort to change the subject.Glad to hear you favored Brown. I thought for sure that one was what stuck in your craw.
How about Griswold or Miranda?
Oh and show us a "liberal Court" in the last 50 years
You lying c**t
Oh and for the record...Plessey was not from the Warren Court you moron
I'm changing discussions and you brig up a case from the 1800s in a discussion about the Warren Court.I never said or suggested that Plessy was from the Warren court.
This was the impetus for this stupid discussion by the way.Nope. It didnāt seem to bother you when the SCOTUS had a significant liberal voting block.
The point you are far too simple minded to handle, moron, was that it is the one that Brown v. Board of education overruled.I'm changing discussions and you brig up a case from the 1800s in a discussion about the Warren Court.
Right. Can't make this shit up
Lol. Youāre the retard who said that in your 68 years there hadnāt been a liberal court. Lol!This was the impetus for this stupid discussion by the way.
That I wasn't concerned about a liberal Court...
The ONLY example you could come up with however was he Warren Court with five Republican appointed Justices that ENDED when I was FOURTEEN you jack ass
Again...you're whining about a liberal Court that hasn't existed for over 50 yearsNope. It didnāt seem to bother you when the SCOTUS had a significant liberal voting block.
It was in your lifetime.Again...you're whining about a liberal Court that hasn't existed for over 50 years
And no...I wasn't bothered about the SC when I was 14
So where are these liberal courts you were whining about asswipe?It was in your lifetime.
And you didnāt limit your comment to being ābotheredā with it. You denied there was one.Youāre an assclown.
Nice try. But post 92 established that you remain full of shit. In that post you quoted my comment but your RESPONSE IS THE POINT.So where are these liberal courts you were whining about asswipe?
"BackAgain said:
Nope. It didnāt seem to bother you when the SCOTUS had a significant liberal voting block."
No...it DIDN'T bother me when I was 14 dickweed.
But then YOU weren't talking about a Court from 50 years ago
YOU were stupidly trying to claim that there was a recent "liberal court".
There wasn't. Tuck tail and go away retard
You replied:Nope. It didnāt seem to bother you when the SCOTUS had a significant liberal voting block.
The same time you gave up beating your wife.When did tom sewell give up on Democracy?
So you believe the court that ruled the constitution mandates gay marriage is conservative?Again...you're whining about a liberal Court that hasn't existed for over 50 years
And no...I wasn't bothered about the SC when I was 14