Thomas has accepted $4M in gifts during career: Watchdog

[TNHarley]

Because it gives the appearance that you are indebted to the wealthy Conservative donors

You turn down those lavish gifts
”Because it doesn’t look right”

They have been friends for like 30 years. Youre fucking stupid.

 

[Leweman]

Because it gives the appearance that you are indebted to the wealthy Conservative donors

You turn down those lavish gifts
”Because it doesn’t look right”

Democrats are the wealthy donors that steal from tax payers though.

 

[TNHarley]

No, it was never debunked and the Roberts Court did nothing to show they are not corrupted

Yes, it was, liar.

 

[Rawley]

If you are a Supreme Court Justice trying to appear impartial……You do not accept “free stuff”

"Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg disclosed taking more trips than any other justice in 2018, totaling 14. She visited Tel Aviv, Israel where she was awarded a lifetime achievement award by the Genesis Prize Foundation. Shortly following the award ceremony, she disclosed being provided transportation, food and lodging as a tourist and guest of billionaire Israeli businessman Morris Kahn.

Companies spawned by Kahn have had had business before the Supreme Court before. The high court handed Amdocs Limited a win in November 2017 when it declined to take up a patent-related case."

Supreme Court justices continue to rack up trips on private interest dime

Supreme Court justices disclosed taking a combined 64 trips in 2018 in which things like transportation, food and lodging were reimbursed by others.

www.opensecrets.org

 

[BackAgain]

Based on the OP. He isn't exactly the picture of propriety.

The OP is of course suspect.

You think Supreme court justices should be accept a couple of million$ from Billionaire, and you're good with it?

I don’t care if a billionaire pal shares some valuable things with a jurist until and unless that billionaire has a legal matter before the court.

I’m ok with it unless it poses an actual conflict of interest. Otherwise, it’s quite unclear why it would be of any concern to you. Except of course for partisan hackery.

 

[Foxfyre]

This shit was debunked a year or so ago when it first started coming up. These guys just hate the uncle tom. Thats it.

That's it. He's smart. He's black. He's conservative. That makes him both hated and a danger to the worst agenda of the left. They wouldn't work as hard to take him down if he was white.

 

[rightwinger]

"Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg disclosed taking more trips than any other justice in 2018, totaling 14. She visited Tel Aviv, Israel where she was awarded a lifetime achievement award by the Genesis Prize Foundation. Shortly following the award ceremony, she disclosed being provided transportation, food and lodging as a tourist and guest of billionaire Israeli businessman Morris Kahn.

Companies spawned by Kahn have had had business before the Supreme Court before. The high court handed Amdocs Limited a win in November 2017 when it declined to take up a patent-related case."

Supreme Court justices continue to rack up trips on private interest dime

Supreme Court justices disclosed taking a combined 64 trips in 2018 in which things like transportation, food and lodging were reimbursed by others.

www.opensecrets.org

Does that make her impartial?

Would you be OK with liberal justices accepting handouts from George Soros?

 

[TNHarley]

That's it. He's smart. He's black. He's conservative. That makes him both hated and a danger to the worst agenda of the left. They wouldn't work as hard to take him down if he was white.

Exactly. I understand the amount is high, but his best friend is a billionaire. I mean, duh.
Gotta get the token black!

 

[TNHarley]

Does that make her impartial?

Would you be OK with liberal justices accepting handouts from George Soros?

Have they been best friends for 30 years?

 

[rightwinger]

Exactly. I understand the amount is high, but his best friend is a billionaire. I mean, duh.
Gotta get the token black!

If your best friend is a billionaire, you explain that accepting lavish gifts “does not look right” and turn them down

 

[rightwinger]

Have they been best friends for 30 years?

Were they “best friends” before he was appointed to the Supreme Court?

 

[BackAgain]

Were they “best friends” before he was appointed to the Supreme Court?

Again: does it matter if the billionaire buddy has no case before the SUPREME COURT?

 

[rightwinger]

Again: does it matter if the billionaire buddy has no case before the SUPREME COURT?

Yes it does

Because his BFF is a major contributor to the Republican Party and accepting lavish gifts gives the appearance of impropriety

Why can’t Thomas be best friends without accepting gifts?

 

[Rawley]

Does that make her impartial?

You tell me - accepting gifts from people with with cases before the court. What would you say if you were on the other side?

Would you be OK with liberal justices accepting handouts from George Soros?

If he didn't have any business before the court ...

 

[BackAgain]

Yes it does

Because his BFF is a major contributor to the Republican Party and accepting lavish gifts gives the appearance of impropriety

Only to you. But then, you’re just a hack.

Why can’t Thomas be best friends without accepting gifts?

Why can’t he accept gifts as long as he thereby has no actual conflict of interest.

Your “appearance of impropriety” argument is facile and silly.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Thomas should be impeached based on legislation by The GOP.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

That's it. He's smart. He's black. He's conservative. That makes him both hated and a danger to the worst agenda of the left. They wouldn't work as hard to take him down if he was white.

No, it is not that. He is a lousy, corrupt Justice. Your age is showing, Foxfyre.

 

[Leweman]

Because it gives the appearance that you are indebted to the wealthy Conservative donors

You turn down those lavish gifts
”Because it doesn’t look right”

Better than being indebted to to retards. Which doesn't exclude them from the latter.

 

[Zincwarrior]

People who are good at their job deserve accolades and bonuses.

You mean bribes?

 

[BackAgain]

You mean bribes?

Folks like you can toss that word around. But you cannot prove it or even show any rational basis for the snide empty claim.