JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,527
- 2,165
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #41
If its the same evidence then it doesnt pertain to the election and the electors should not see it.........

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If its the same evidence then it doesnt pertain to the election and the electors should not see it.........
I just tried, but couldn't make heads or tails of that. Which is the fault of the whole argument, not you. LOLthis is not the same reason for the briefing or evidence as then.....is it.....LLMMAAOOOO....no this is supposedly something that happened during the election that prove Donnie and Putin were in cahootsthey have been told to brief Congress by Congress......I'm saying they got nothing and dont want to let the secret out of the bag...........cant have thatWant to keep it secret........riiiggghhhttttt.......what we have is more lawlessness by Fed agencies defying Congress.......
So you dont want it kept secret? Tell them to brief congress then. I'm only agreeing with you
Ahh, if they had nothing then why have they briefed Congress since 2015? It must be one of those evidence fee declassified meetings
So you want them to brief congress too and if they dont they are keeping a secret. Then you learned they have been briefing congress and you say its not the same evidence...the evidence you said they dont have. No one said Donnie and Putin was in cohoots or they had evidence of that. Maybe thats where you're confused.
I just tried, but couldn't make heads or tails of that. Which is the fault of the whole argument, not you. LOLthis is not the same reason for the briefing or evidence as then.....is it.....LLMMAAOOOO....no this is supposedly something that happened during the election that prove Donnie and Putin were in cahootsthey have been told to brief Congress by Congress......I'm saying they got nothing and dont want to let the secret out of the bag...........cant have thatSo you dont want it kept secret? Tell them to brief congress then. I'm only agreeing with you
Ahh, if they had nothing then why have they briefed Congress since 2015? It must be one of those evidence fee declassified meetings
So you want them to brief congress too and if they dont they are keeping a secret. Then you learned they have been briefing congress and you say its not the same evidence...the evidence you said they dont have. No one said Donnie and Putin was in cohoots or they had evidence of that. Maybe thats where you're confused.
You are double talking yourself into a blather.....was very clear on what I said......If its the same evidence as you claim then how does it apply to the election........werent we all told new evidence had surfaced......Obama himself has clamed multiple times there was no evidence of election tampering or hacking..........if they have evidence..its not from 2015.......if they have evidence Congress has a right to see it......if its from 2015 it doesnt apply to the election and the electors dont need to see it,,,,,,I dont believe they have anything new ergo they dont want that out.......and thats why they dont want to brief Congress ......clear enough dumbassIf its the same evidence then it doesnt pertain to the election and the electors should not see it.........
The same evidence? Dont you mean no evidence like you claimed before? Or now they do have evidence and you just know its different than the evidence you said they didnt have?
. . . as does Clinton and Trumpelthinskin. That's the point and the problem.I just tried, but couldn't make heads or tails of that. Which is the fault of the whole argument, not you. LOLthis is not the same reason for the briefing or evidence as then.....is it.....LLMMAAOOOO....no this is supposedly something that happened during the election that prove Donnie and Putin were in cahootsthey have been told to brief Congress by Congress......I'm saying they got nothing and dont want to let the secret out of the bag...........cant have that
Ahh, if they had nothing then why have they briefed Congress since 2015? It must be one of those evidence fee declassified meetings
So you want them to brief congress too and if they dont they are keeping a secret. Then you learned they have been briefing congress and you say its not the same evidence...the evidence you said they dont have. No one said Donnie and Putin was in cohoots or they had evidence of that. Maybe thats where you're confused.
I think hes saying they dont have evidence but the evidence they dont have is different than the other evidence they dont have....That and Obama smells like Sulfer
That's me. No circus in town. Hillary won't be coming to town.What's up with that photograph? Is that really you? Is a circus in town?You too, shit skillet.This is a joke, right? I mean you reefer-eng to another member as a laughing stock?As if you even know what morning it is when you get up.He would if he actually had any proof of anything. He knows they might ask him to provide proof of his claims and he has none.![]()
Apparently you hear voices in your head. You have become so petty in your butt hurt that you are the single biggest laughingstock on USMB.
You are double talking yourself into a blather.....was very clear on what I said......If its the same evidence as you claimIf its the same evidence then it doesnt pertain to the election and the electors should not see it.........
The same evidence? Dont you mean no evidence like you claimed before? Or now they do have evidence and you just know its different than the evidence you said they didnt have?
then how does it apply to the election........werent we all told new evidence had surfaced
......Obama himself has clamed multiple times there was no evidence of election tampering or hacking
..........if they have evidence..its not from 2015
.......if they have evidence Congress has a right to see it......if its from 2015 it doesnt apply to the election and the electors dont need to see it,,,,,,I dont believe they have anything new ergo they dont want that out.......and thats why they dont want to brief Congress ......clear enough dumbass
Go ahead if you want to complain about a Signature.Yo Jake...accusing me of being inside Trumps ass is very offensive.
I may report said offense.....
A signature is part of a post.Go ahead if you want to complain about a Signature.Yo Jake...accusing me of being inside Trumps ass is very offensive.
I may report said offense.....
Yep, the trumpelthinskins changed their stories 739 times in 181 days.LLMAAAOOOOOO........oldsters be very slow around here,,,,,cant keep up with their parties multiple ever changing storyline
LLMAAAOOOOOO........oldsters be very slow around here,,,,,cant keep up with their parties multiple ever changing storyline
Fair enough, sirThat's me. No circus in town. Hillary won't be coming to town.What's up with that photograph? Is that really you? Is a circus in town?You too, shit skillet.This is a joke, right? I mean you reefer-eng to another member as a laughing stock?As if you even know what morning it is when you get up.![]()
Apparently you hear voices in your head. You have become so petty in your butt hurt that you are the single biggest laughingstock on USMB.
I'm not a Whiner like you Jacqueline...and your op sucks.You completely justify my OP to the max, deltex1. So report if you wish. I did it for you.
,,,and that's how they make their hot buttered popcorn.The old corn cob with a bit of KY jelly is what Jake uses when Lewdog comes over."Go to the corn?" Are you from Kansas?