This Road is for Jews Only. Yes, There is Apartheid in Israel

[toastman]

I have ancestors who are native Americans, so your words have not a thing to do with me.

And the thread topic is Apartheid Israel.

Does the poster have the mental intellect to address the thread topic?

My link is a legal analysis proving Israel practices Apartheid.

ISRAELI APARTHEID – A Basic Legal Perspective


Essay: Israeli Laws and Discrimination


All we have to do is look at the difference between how Jews and Palestinians are treated in Occupied Palestine and Israel and this is Apartheid.

We have an international crime called Apartheid and Israel commits it.

Where do you live you ******* terrorist? Because if you live in the US, when are you giving the natives back their land?

I noticed you completely ignored Roccos post addressing your accusation of Israel being an apartheid ststae. Why didnt yih answer his questions?

Also Sherri, Ive told you many many times, that none of your posts have any credibiltity . Youve spewed too many lies, youve shown us too much of your disgusting bigoty , hatred and hypocrisy. Whatever you post about Israel means nothing because its coming from you. You are only here for us to laugh at you. So shut your Nazi mouth and stop with your Palestinian lies you despicable pile of pig shit

 

[Sally]

I have ancestors who are native Americans, so your words have not a thing to do with me.

And the thread topic is Apartheid Israel.

Does the poster have the mental intellect to address the thread topic?

My link is a legal analysis proving Israel practices Apartheid.

ISRAELI APARTHEID – A Basic Legal Perspective


Essay: Israeli Laws and Discrimination


All we have to do is look at the difference between how Jews and Palestinians are treated in Occupied Palestine and Israel and this is Apartheid.

We have an international crime called Apartheid and Israel commits it.

Where do you live you ******* terrorist? Because if you live in the US, when are you giving the natives back their land?

Do us a favor, Mrs. Sherri. You can't seem to get off of your apartheid shtick even though your friends are busy murdering people in other countries. Would you please write those South Africans who experienced Apartheid and who have visited Israel and say there is no Apartheid there. You can tell them they are all liars. While you are at it, why not write to Rev. Hedding, who himeself fought Apartheid in South Africa and who now lives in Israel. You can tell him that he is a liar also. Perhaps this way you can get this out of your system.

REV. MALCOLM HEDDING: THE GROSS LIE OF ?ISRAELI APARTHEID?- FROM ONE WHO EXPERIENCED THE REAL THING | RUTHFULLY YOURS

 

[Kondor3]

So what?

Saudi Arabia...

Iran...

Ah! "SO WHAT?"

Noticed that, didja?

 

[Billo_Really]

Do you even know what apartheid means, idiot?

Apartheid is separation based on race!

Arguing semantics, will not win this debate.

Israeli Arabs and Israel Jews can drive on the same roads. Palestinians cannot based on security.

No they can't drive on the same roads and your security comment is just a bullshit lie. We are talking about the area of the West Bank. An area where it is illegal for Israeli's to even be. An area, where Palestinian's are prohibited from driving roads on their own land. I mean, how fucked do you plan to be?

If Israeli Arabs and Israeli Jews can walk the same sidewalks, learn in the same school, sit in the same bus seats, it's not separation based on race, therefor not apartheid!

I'm glad you brought up the "buses". Because just like the old Jim Crow laws of the South, segregation has reared its ugly head towards the Pals.

Palestinian workers with legal permits are being ordered off buses. Settlers claim they pose a security risk. Israel’s Transport Ministry may exclude Arabs. Buses henceforth may be for Jews only.

Jim Crow America relegated Blacks to the back of buses. Israel perhaps wants Arabs excluded entirely.

On November 27, B’Tselem headlined “Attempt at bus segregation appalling,” saying:

Disclosure about possible segregated bus lines is uncalled for. Services “must be available on an equal basis to all and any who require them.”​

B’Tselem’s executive director Jessica Montell said:

“The attempt at bus segregation is appalling, and the current arguments about ‘security needs’ and ‘overcrowding’ must not be allowed to camouflage the blatant racism of the demand to remove Palestinians from buses.”​

You're a ******* country of liars!

And the only reason you lie, is because you're too ***** to deal with what your country is doing wrong.

But to try and reason with Anti-Israelis is like talking to the wall. waste of time and energy.

I'm not anti-Israeli and it is very easy to reason with me.

You just can't do it with bullshit!

 

[MHunterB]

"You're a ******* country of liars!"

"I'm not anti-Israeli and it is very easy to reason with me"

Billo, are you feeling OK? You seem a bit ..................................................conflicted.

 

[aris2chat]

Do you even know what apartheid means, idiot?

Apartheid is separation based on race!

Arguing semantics, will not win this debate.

Israeli Arabs and Israel Jews can drive on the same roads. Palestinians cannot based on security.

No they can't drive on the same roads and your security comment is just a bullshit lie. We are talking about the area of the West Bank. An area where it is illegal for Israeli's to even be. An area, where Palestinian's are prohibited from driving roads on their own land. I mean, how fucked do you plan to be?

I'm glad you brought up the "buses". Because just like the old Jim Crow laws of the South, segregation has reared its ugly head towards the Pals.

Palestinian workers with legal permits are being ordered off buses. Settlers claim they pose a security risk. Israel’s Transport Ministry may exclude Arabs. Buses henceforth may be for Jews only.

Jim Crow America relegated Blacks to the back of buses. Israel perhaps wants Arabs excluded entirely.

On November 27, B’Tselem headlined “Attempt at bus segregation appalling,” saying:

Disclosure about possible segregated bus lines is uncalled for. Services “must be available on an equal basis to all and any who require them.”​

B’Tselem’s executive director Jessica Montell said:

“The attempt at bus segregation is appalling, and the current arguments about ‘security needs’ and ‘overcrowding’ must not be allowed to camouflage the blatant racism of the demand to remove Palestinians from buses.”​

You're a ******* country of liars!

And the only reason you lie, is because you're too ***** to deal with what your country is doing wrong.

But to try and reason with Anti-Israelis is like talking to the wall. waste of time and energy.

I'm not anti-Israeli and it is very easy to reason with me.

You just can't do it with bullshit!

That was two years ago and had to do with security problems at the time.

 

[Victory67]

You cant have apartheid in occupied territory under the Geneva conventions, so stop LYING LIKE A CHEAP RUG

So Israel is violating the GC. I'm glad we agree.

 

[flacaltenn]

These annexations have no legality whatsoever under international law.

And the UN has acknowledged these principles of international law in many resolutions.

Jordan never had sovereignty rights in the land, they were occupiers too.

Occupations do not give nations sovereignty rights in land.

The sovereignty rights to the land belong to the indigenous Palestinian people who have a right of self determination in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

It's not an occupation once land is annexed and citizens are given full rights and representation.. It was JORDAN that fought in '48 and preserved the West Bank and the East Jerusalem (with training from the Brits).

They became citizens of Greater Jordan. And much gold and treasury was dumped into the West bank. SOME of these citizens mounted insurrections against the Jordanian Govt. They couldn't COPE with a "one nation" solution EVEN WHEN that nation was COMPLETELY friendly and cooperative to their cause.. That should speak volumes about "integrating Palestinians (as a whole) as recognized citizens"

The US, Britain, Russia and several other nations had no problem with the Jordan annexation. Only the Arab League had a problem. Land was NOT occupied, it was put under Jordanian administration. If the Arab League had TRUELY WANTED to create a Palestinian state, they had about 15 years from 1950 to 1967 to get it done.. After the Palestinians repeatedly attacked the Kingdom tho --- I doubt even the Arab League could find enough responsible Palestinian leadership to found an independent West Bank state.

 

[Victory67]

The US, Britain, Russia and several other nations had no problem with the Jordan annexation. Only the Arab League had a problem. Land was NOT occupied, it was put under Jordanian administration. If the Arab League had TRUELY WANTED to create a Palestinian state, they had about 15 years from 1950 to 1967 to get it done.. After the Palestinians repeatedly attacked the Kingdom tho --- I doubt even the Arab League could find enough responsible Palestinian leadership to found an independent West Bank state.

Jordan Occupied the West Bank. They also illegally annexed it.

But you are right, they should have turned the West Bank into a seperate independent state.

 

[Billo_Really]

"You're a ******* country of liars!"

"I'm not anti-Israeli and it is very easy to reason with me"

Billo, are you feeling OK? You seem a bit ..................................................conflicted.

What's conflicted about it?

She was lying, I fully support the Israeli left and you can't use bullshit to reason with me.

 

[Phoenall]

No nation is honor bound to choose to be an Apartheid Regime.

Apartheid is a choice.

???? ????? ??? ?????? - How to Build a Fence in Hebron?? - YouTube

Makes perfect sense to me. Israel is duty-bound to protect its citizens.

Which is why there is no apartheid in Israel, yet the Palestinians want to introduce apartheid in their country once they have one. Figure that one out if you can ?

 

[Phoenall]

These annexations have no legality whatsoever under international law.

And the UN has acknowledged these principles of international law in many resolutions.

Jordan never had sovereignty rights in the land, they were occupiers too.

Occupations do not give nations sovereignty rights in land.

The sovereignty rights to the land belong to the indigenous Palestinian people who have a right of self determination in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

It's not an occupation once land is annexed and citizens are given full rights and representation.. It was JORDAN that fought in '48 and preserved the West Bank and the East Jerusalem (with training from the Brits).

They became citizens of Greater Jordan. And much gold and treasury was dumped into the West bank. SOME of these citizens mounted insurrections against the Jordanian Govt. They couldn't COPE with a "one nation" solution EVEN WHEN that nation was COMPLETELY friendly and cooperative to their cause.. That should speak volumes about "integrating Palestinians (as a whole) as recognized citizens"

But occupation for defence is allowed under International Law and is covered in the Geneva conventions. These also allow for punitive measures against belligerence shown by the indigenous, up to and including execution

 

[Phoenall]

In 1967, Israel occupied the West Bank and unilaterally annexed to its territory 70.5 km2 of the occupied area, which were subsequently integrated within the Jerusalem municipality. This annexation contravenes international law and was not recognized by the UN Security Council or UN member states.2 Irrespective of Israel’s annexation, the area of East Jerusalem continues to form part of the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) and its Palestinian residents remain protected by international humanitarian law (IHL).

The planning crisis in East Jerusalem: "illegal" construction - OCHA Special Focus (1 May 2009)

Did they indeed, or did they just take back land stolen from them in 1948 that they hold title to. In 1948 there were 100,000 Jews living in Jerusalem and 40,000 muslims, by the end of 1949 there were no Jews in Jerusalem at all they had been expelled by the muslims who stole their land

 

[Phoenall]

What are you babbling about?

Israel is the Apartheid Regime.

No nation is honor bound to choose to be an Apartheid Regime. Apartheid is a choice...

Indeed.

When will Iran and Saudi Arabia change their evil ways?

That is an outright LIE spread by ISLAMONAZI ANTI SEMITIC JEW HATERS AND MORONIC MUSLIMS. The Law says that Israel is not apartheid at all, and the UN backs this to the hilt

 

[Phoenall]

so what?

None of that proves apartheid, the apartheid practiced by israel.

what are you babbling about?

Israel is the apartheid regime.

saudi arabia...

iran...

then were is your corrabaritive evidence of apartheid in israel then sharia shaitan. Were is the arrest warrant issued by the hague for the israeli regime on charges of crimes against humanity. What happens in the west bank is covered by the geneva conventions and is legal until such time as the laws are changed.

 

[Phoenall]

I have ancestors who are native Americans, so your words have not a thing to do with me.

And I am a Christian and an American.

And I am not taking life and have never taken the life of any person and I am not a terrorist.

And the thread topic is Apartheid Israel.

Does the poster have the mental intellect to address the thread topic?

My link is a legal analysis proving Israel practices Apartheid.

ISRAELI APARTHEID – A Basic Legal Perspective


Essay: Israeli Laws and Discrimination


All we have to do is look at the difference between how Jews and Palestinians are treated in Occupied Palestine and Israel and this is Apartheid.

We have an international crime called Apartheid and Israel commits it.

Where do you live you ******* terrorist? Because if you live in the US, when are you giving the natives back their land?

bullshit

 

[Billo_Really]

then were is your corrabaritive evidence of apartheid in israel then sharia shaitan. Were is the arrest warrant issued by the hague for the israeli regime on charges of crimes against humanity. What happens in the west bank is covered by the geneva conventions and is legal until such time as the laws are changed.

It's "c-o-r-r-o-b-o-r-a-t-i-v-e", not "corrabaritive", BIG RED WORD guy.

 

[Kondor3]

Consider yourself properly chastised, Phoenall, by one of our self-appointed Spelling and Grammar Nazis... now... aren't you ashamed of yourself for not spelling that word properly?

 

[Chaussette]

then were is your corrabaritive evidence of apartheid in israel then sharia shaitan. Were is the arrest warrant issued by the hague for the israeli regime on charges of crimes against humanity. What happens in the west bank is covered by the geneva conventions and is legal until such time as the laws are changed.

It's "c-o-r-r-o-b-o-r-a-t-i-v-e", not "corrabaritive", BIG RED WORD guy.

So Bill, you give your land back to the natives yet?

 

[Phoenall]

then were is your corrabaritive evidence of apartheid in israel then sharia shaitan. Were is the arrest warrant issued by the hague for the israeli regime on charges of crimes against humanity. What happens in the west bank is covered by the geneva conventions and is legal until such time as the laws are changed.

It's "c-o-r-r-o-b-o-r-a-t-i-v-e", not "corrabaritive", BIG RED WORD guy.

In other words you have none and cant justify your LIES and JEW HATRED. A sign you have lost the argument and must find some way of saving face is to employ the neo Marxist rules of disinformation.

In this case rule 14 use spelling mistakes and typos as a means of drawing the casual readers eyes away from the truth that has just destroyed your argument