This Road is for Jews Only. Yes, There is Apartheid in Israel

[Kondor3]

"...Can you name a road that is under this prohibition?..."

Crickets...

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

ISRAELI APARTHEID – A Basic Legal Perspective


http://www.israellawresourcecenter.org/israellaws/essays/israellawsessay.htm


All we have to do is look at the difference between how Jews and Palestinians are treated in Occupied Palestine and Israel and this is Apartheid.

We have an international crime called Apartheid and Israel commits it.

There is no such thing "Road for Jews only".

Liar.

Then what do you call roads that prohibit Palestinian's from traveling on?

Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem reports that 170 km of roads in the West Bank are either off-limits to Palestinians or highly restricted.

Do you even know what apartheid means, idiot?

Apartheid is separation based on race!

Israeli Arabs and Israel Jews can drive on the same roads. Palestinians cannot based on security.

If Israeli Arabs and Israeli Jews can walk the same sidewalks, learn in the same school, sit in the same bus seats, it's not separation based on race, therefor not apartheid!

But to try and reason with Anti-Israelis is like talking to the wall. waste of time and energy.

 

[Sweet_Caroline]

You wouldn't know apartheid if it were rammed up your kiechels.

 

[Ronin]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qC4EEPVRBsE]???? ????? ??? ?????? - How to Build a Fence in Hebron?? - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Sweet_Caroline]

???? ????? ??? ?????? - How to Build a Fence in Hebron?? - YouTube

Makes perfect sense to me. Israel is duty-bound to protect its citizens.

 

[Chaussette]

ISRAELI APARTHEID – A Basic Legal Perspective


Essay: Israeli Laws and Discrimination


All we have to do is look at the difference between how Jews and Palestinians are treated in Occupied Palestine and Israel and this is Apartheid.

We have an international crime called Apartheid and Israel commits it.

Then what do you call roads that prohibit Palestinian's from traveling on?

Do you even know what apartheid means, idiot?

Apartheid is separation based on race!

Israeli Arabs and Israel Jews can drive on the same roads. Palestinians cannot based on security.

If Israeli Arabs and Israeli Jews can walk the same sidewalks, learn in the same school, sit in the same bus seats, it's not separation based on race, therefor not apartheid!

But to try and reason with Anti-Israelis is like talking to the wall. waste of time and energy.

Where do you live you ******* terrorist? Because if you live in the US, when are you giving the natives back their land?

 

[Phoenall]

ISRAELI APARTHEID – A Basic Legal Perspective


Essay: Israeli Laws and Discrimination


All we have to do is look at the difference between how Jews and Palestinians are treated in Occupied Palestine and Israel and this is Apartheid.

We have an international crime called Apartheid and Israel commits it.

Then what do you call roads that prohibit Palestinian's from traveling on?

Do you even know what apartheid means, idiot?

Apartheid is separation based on race!

Israeli Arabs and Israel Jews can drive on the same roads. Palestinians cannot based on security.

If Israeli Arabs and Israeli Jews can walk the same sidewalks, learn in the same school, sit in the same bus seats, it's not separation based on race, therefor not apartheid!

But to try and reason with Anti-Israelis is like talking to the wall. waste of time and energy.

You cant have apartheid in occupied territory under the Geneva conventions, so stop LYING LIKE A CHEAP RUG

 

[RoccoR]

SherriMunnerlyn, et al,

Let's look at this an examine this.

ISRAELI APARTHEID – A Basic Legal Perspective
Essay: Israeli Laws and Discrimination
All we have to do is look at the difference between how Jews and Palestinians are treated in Occupied Palestine and Israel and this is Apartheid.

We have an international crime called Apartheid and Israel commits it.

(COMMENT)

Is there such a law? And if so what is it and what are the elements of the offense?

Yes! There is such an international Law.

Article 7 - Crimes Against Humanity - PART 2. JURISDICTION, ADMISSIBILITY AND APPLICABLE LAW - The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
1. For the purpose of this Statute, "crime against humanity" means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:

(j) The crime of apartheid;​

2. For the purpose of paragraph 1:

(h) "The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;​

SOURCE: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

Elements of the Offense:

• Institutionalized regime of systematic oppression; AND,
• Domination by one racial group over any other racial group; AND,
• Committed with the intention of maintaining that regime.

The international support against the "Crime of Apartheid" finds its basis in Articles 55 and 56 of the Charter of the United Nations from 1952 until 1990; and was regularly condemned by the Security Council annually. In 1966, the UN agreed that apartheid was a crime against humanity through the passage of Resolution 2202 A (XXI), known as the Apartheid Convention, and in 1984 the Security Council endorsed this determination [UNSC Resolution 556 (1984) of 23 October 1984].

Article 55

With a view to the creation of conditions of stability and well-being which are necessary for peaceful and friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, the United Nations shall promote:

• higher standards of living, full employment, and conditions of economic and social progress and development;
• solutions of international economic, social, health, and related problems; and international cultural and educational cooperation; and
• universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion.

Article 56

All Members pledge themselves to take joint and separate action in co-operation with the Organization for the achievement of the purposes set forth in Article 55.​

SOURCE: Chapter IX, UN Charter

The convention basically outlines the various ways in which "Apartheid" manifests itself using South Africa as a model. This was a model for the separate development of the races, preserving white superiority over the black majority. "These include murder, torture, inhuman treatment and arbitrary arrest of members of a racial group; deliberate imposition on a racial group of living conditions calculated to cause it physical destruction; legislative measures that discriminate in the political, social, economic and cultural fields; measures that divide the population along racial lines by the creation of separate residential areas for racial groups; the prohibition of interracial marriages; and the persecution of persons opposed to apartheid."

CLEARLY, you are not talking about inside the State of Israel. So you must be concerned about the Occupied Territories (OpT); meaning the West Bank. So, under what examples are you applying the "Crime of Apartheid?"

• There is no murder, torture, inhuman treatment and arbitrary arrest of members of a racial group by the Occupation. They are handled in accordance with the Geneva Convention.
  
• There is no deliberate imposition on a racial group of living conditions calculated to cause it physical destruction. All is handled in accordance with the Oslo Accords.
  
• There are no laws or legislative measures that discriminate in the political, social, economic and cultural fields. It is Palestinian law.
  
• There are no measures that divide the population along racial lines by the creation of separate residential areas for racial groups. It is the enforcement of border controls and containment against Hostile Arab Palestinian Jihadist and Fedayeen attempting to overcome Israeli Sovereignty, threatening Genocide, and violating the principles of international law concerning friendly relations and co-operation among States.
  
• There is no prohibition of interracial marriages.
  
• There are no persecutions of persons opposed to apartheid, because their is no "Apartheid" Laws.

As to the elements of the offense,

• Institutionalized regime of systematic oppression; AND,
  • Israel has made no attempt to depose the PLO as the sole representative of the Palestinian People. There is no systematic program of oppression.
• Domination by one racial group over any other racial group; AND,
  • Israel did not attempt to prevent the Declaration of Independence, or the establishment of the Palestinian State.
• Committed with the intention of maintaining that regime.
  • There has been no interference in the progression of the Palestinian State. The Occupation is a defensive measure to protect the integrity of Israel, and the containment of Jihadist and Fedayeen that refuse to negotiate for peace in good faith.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Sweet_Caroline]

SherriMunnerlyn, et al,

Let's look at this an examine this.

ISRAELI APARTHEID – A Basic Legal Perspective
Essay: Israeli Laws and Discrimination
All we have to do is look at the difference between how Jews and Palestinians are treated in Occupied Palestine and Israel and this is Apartheid.

We have an international crime called Apartheid and Israel commits it.

(COMMENT)

Is there such a law? And if so what is it and what are the elements of the offense?

Yes! There is such an international Law.

Article 7 - Crimes Against Humanity - PART 2. JURISDICTION, ADMISSIBILITY AND APPLICABLE LAW - The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
1. For the purpose of this Statute, "crime against humanity" means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:

(j) The crime of apartheid;​

2. For the purpose of paragraph 1:

(h) "The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;​

SOURCE: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

Elements of the Offense:

• Institutionalized regime of systematic oppression; AND,
• Domination by one racial group over any other racial group; AND,
• Committed with the intention of maintaining that regime.

The international support against the "Crime of Apartheid" finds its basis in Articles 55 and 56 of the Charter of the United Nations from 1952 until 1990; and was regularly condemned by the Security Council annually. In 1966, the UN agreed that apartheid was a crime against humanity through the passage of Resolution 2202 A (XXI), known as the Apartheid Convention, and in 1984 the Security Council endorsed this determination [UNSC Resolution 556 (1984) of 23 October 1984].

Article 55

With a view to the creation of conditions of stability and well-being which are necessary for peaceful and friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, the United Nations shall promote:

• higher standards of living, full employment, and conditions of economic and social progress and development;
• solutions of international economic, social, health, and related problems; and international cultural and educational cooperation; and
• universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion.

Article 56

All Members pledge themselves to take joint and separate action in co-operation with the Organization for the achievement of the purposes set forth in Article 55.​

SOURCE: Chapter IX, UN Charter

The convention basically outlines the various ways in which "Apartheid" manifests itself using South Africa as a model. This was a model for the separate development of the races, preserving white superiority over the black majority. "These include murder, torture, inhuman treatment and arbitrary arrest of members of a racial group; deliberate imposition on a racial group of living conditions calculated to cause it physical destruction; legislative measures that discriminate in the political, social, economic and cultural fields; measures that divide the population along racial lines by the creation of separate residential areas for racial groups; the prohibition of interracial marriages; and the persecution of persons opposed to apartheid."

CLEARLY, you are not talking about inside the State of Israel. So you must be concerned about the Occupied Territories (OpT); meaning the West Bank. So, under what examples are you applying the "Crime of Apartheid?"

• There is no murder, torture, inhuman treatment and arbitrary arrest of members of a racial group by the Occupation. They are handled in accordance with the Geneva Convention.
  
• There is no deliberate imposition on a racial group of living conditions calculated to cause it physical destruction. All is handled in accordance with the Oslo Accords.
  
• There are no laws or legislative measures that discriminate in the political, social, economic and cultural fields. It is Palestinian law.
  
• There are no measures that divide the population along racial lines by the creation of separate residential areas for racial groups. It is the enforcement of border controls and containment against Hostile Arab Palestinian Jihadist and Fedayeen attempting to overcome Israeli Sovereignty, threatening Genocide, and violating the principles of international law concerning friendly relations and co-operation among States.
  
• There is no prohibition of interracial marriages.
  
• There are no persecutions of persons opposed to apartheid, because their is no "Apartheid" Laws.

As to the elements of the offense,

• Institutionalized regime of systematic oppression; AND,
  • Israel has made no attempt to depose the PLO as the sole representative of the Palestinian People. There is no systematic program of oppression.
• Domination by one racial group over any other racial group; AND,
  • Israel did not attempt to prevent the Declaration of Independence, or the establishment of the Palestinian State.
• Committed with the intention of maintaining that regime.
  • There has been no interference in the progression of the Palestinian State. The Occupation is a defensive measure to protect the integrity of Israel, and the containment of Jihadist and Fedayeen that refuse to negotiate for peace in good faith.

Most Respectfully,
R

Excellent

 

[toastman]

SherriMunnerlyn, et al,

Let's look at this an examine this.

ISRAELI APARTHEID – A Basic Legal Perspective
Essay: Israeli Laws and Discrimination
All we have to do is look at the difference between how Jews and Palestinians are treated in Occupied Palestine and Israel and this is Apartheid.

We have an international crime called Apartheid and Israel commits it.

(COMMENT)

Is there such a law? And if so what is it and what are the elem ents of the offense?

Yes! There is such an international Law.

Article 7 - Crimes Against Humanity - PART 2. JURISDICTION, ADMISSIBILITY AND APPLICABLE LAW - The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
1. For the purpose of this Statute, "crime against humanity" means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:

(j) The crime of apartheid;​

2. For the purpose of paragraph 1:

(h) "The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;​

SOURCE: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

Elements of the Offense:

• Institutionalized regime of systematic oppression; AND,
• Domination by one racial group over any other racial group; AND,
• Committed with the intention of maintaining that regime.

The international support against the "Crime of Apartheid" finds its basis in Articles 55 and 56 of the Charter of the United Nations from 1952 until 1990; and was regularly condemned by the Security Council annually. In 1966, the UN agreed that apartheid was a crime against humanity through the passage of Resolution 2202 A (XXI), known as the Apartheid Convention, and in 1984 the Security Council endorsed this determination [UNSC Resolution 556 (1984) of 23 October 1984].

Article 55

With a view to the creation of conditions of stability and well-being which are necessary for peaceful and friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, the United Nations shall promote:

• higher standards of living, full employment, and conditions of economic and social progress and development;
• solutions of international economic, social, health, and related problems; and international cultural and educational cooperation; and
• universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion.

Article 56

All Members pledge themselves to take joint and separate action in co-operation with the Organization for the achievement of the purposes set forth in Article 55.​

SOURCE: Chapter IX, UN Charter

The convention basically outlines the various ways in which "Apartheid" manifests itself using South Africa as a model. This was a model for the separate development of the races, preserving white superiority over the black majority. "These include murder, torture, inhuman treatment and arbitrary arrest of members of a racial group; deliberate imposition on a racial group of living conditions calculated to cause it physical destruction; legislative measures that discriminate in the political, social, economic and cultural fields; measures that divide the population along racial lines by the creation of separate residential areas for racial groups; the prohibition of interracial marriages; and the persecution of persons opposed to apartheid."

CLEARLY, you are not talking about inside the State of Israel. So you must be concerned about the Occupied Territories (OpT); meaning the West Bank. So, under what examples are you applying the "Crime of Apartheid?"

• There is no murder, torture, inhuman treatment and arbitrary arrest of members of a racial group by the Occupation. They are handled in accordance with the Geneva Convention.
  
• There is no deliberate imposition on a racial group of living conditions calculated to cause it physical destruction. All is handled in accordance with the Oslo Accords.
  
• There are no laws or legislative measures that discriminate in the political, social, economic and cultural fields. It is Palestinian law.
  
• There are no measures that divide the population along racial lines by the creation of separate residential areas for racial groups. It is the enforcement of border controls and containment against Hostile Arab Palestinian Jihadist and Fedayeen attempting to overcome Israeli Sovereignty, threatening Genocide, and violating the principles of international law concerning friendly relations and co-operation among States.
  
• There is no prohibition of interracial marriages.
  
• There are no persecutions of persons opposed to apartheid, because their is no "Apartheid" Laws.

As to the elements of the offense,

• Institutionalized regime of systematic oppression; AND,
  • Israel has made no attempt to depose the PLO as the sole representative of the Palestinian People. There is no systematic program of oppression.
• Domination by one racial group over any other racial group; AND,
  • Israel did not attempt to prevent the Declaration of Independence, or the establishment of the Palestinian State.
• Committed with the intention of maintaining that regime.
  • There has been no interference in the progression of the Palestinian State. The Occupation is a defensive measure to protect the integrity of Israel, and the containment of Jihadist and Fedayeen that refuse to negotiate for peace in good faith.

Most Respectfully,
R

Very well said Rocco. Thanks for this post.
Unfortunately you are talking to Sherri, and she is incapable of understanding anything past ' Israel bad, Palestine good,.

 

[flacaltenn]

Jordan never had sovereignty rights in the land, they were occupiers too.

Occupations do not give nations sovereignty rights in land.

The sovereignty rights to the land belong to the indigenous Palestinian people who have a right of self determination in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

That has nothing to do with it.

You can't move into an area and automatically have more rights than the people already living there.

The people living there were CITIZENS OF JORDAN..
The only government representation in the West Bank for 30 yrs was thru the Jordanian Parliament.

The govt of Jordan lost that land to Israel. I'm asking you if you know why JORDAN doesn't want it back anymore..

It's not an occupation once land is annexed and citizens are given full rights and representation.. It was JORDAN that fought in '48 and preserved the West Bank and the East Jerusalem (with training from the Brits).

They became citizens of Greater Jordan. And much gold and treasury was dumped into the West bank. SOME of these citizens mounted insurrections against the Jordanian Govt. They couldn't COPE with a "one nation" solution EVEN WHEN that nation was COMPLETELY friendly and cooperative to their cause.. That should speak volumes about "integrating Palestinians (as a whole) as recognized citizens"

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

No nation is honor bound to choose to be an Apartheid Regime.

Apartheid is a choice.

???? ????? ??? ?????? - How to Build a Fence in Hebron?? - YouTube

Makes perfect sense to me. Israel is duty-bound to protect its citizens.

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

These annexations have no legality whatsoever under international law.

And the UN has acknowledged these principles of international law in many resolutions.

Jordan never had sovereignty rights in the land, they were occupiers too.

Occupations do not give nations sovereignty rights in land.

The sovereignty rights to the land belong to the indigenous Palestinian people who have a right of self determination in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

The people living there were CITIZENS OF JORDAN..
The only government representation in the West Bank for 30 yrs was thru the Jordanian Parliament.

The govt of Jordan lost that land to Israel. I'm asking you if you know why JORDAN doesn't want it back anymore..

It's not an occupation once land is annexed and citizens are given full rights and representation.. It was JORDAN that fought in '48 and preserved the West Bank and the East Jerusalem (with training from the Brits).

They became citizens of Greater Jordan. And much gold and treasury was dumped into the West bank. SOME of these citizens mounted insurrections against the Jordanian Govt. They couldn't COPE with a "one nation" solution EVEN WHEN that nation was COMPLETELY friendly and cooperative to their cause.. That should speak volumes about "integrating Palestinians (as a whole) as recognized citizens"

 

[Kondor3]

No nation is honor bound to choose to be an Apartheid Regime. Apartheid is a choice...

Indeed.

When will Iran and Saudi Arabia change their evil ways?

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

In 1967, Israel occupied the West Bank and unilaterally annexed to its territory 70.5 km2 of the occupied area, which were subsequently integrated within the Jerusalem municipality. This annexation contravenes international law and was not recognized by the UN Security Council or UN member states.2 Irrespective of Israel’s annexation, the area of East Jerusalem continues to form part of the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) and its Palestinian residents remain protected by international humanitarian law (IHL).

The planning crisis in East Jerusalem: "illegal" construction - OCHA Special Focus (1 May 2009)

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

What are you babbling about?

Israel is the Apartheid Regime.

No nation is honor bound to choose to be an Apartheid Regime. Apartheid is a choice...

Indeed.

When will Iran and Saudi Arabia change their evil ways?

 

[Kondor3]

What are you babbling about?

Israel is the Apartheid Regime.

No nation is honor bound to choose to be an Apartheid Regime. Apartheid is a choice...

Indeed.

When will Iran and Saudi Arabia change their evil ways?

Saudi Arabia...

Iran...

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

So what?

None of that proves Apartheid, the Apartheid practiced by Israel.

What are you babbling about?

Israel is the Apartheid Regime.

Indeed.

When will Iran and Saudi Arabia change their evil ways?

Saudi Arabia...

Iran...

 

[Indeependent]

So what?

What are you babbling about?

Israel is the Apartheid Regime.

Saudi Arabia...

Iran...

Ah! "SO WHAT?"

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

I have ancestors who are native Americans, so your words have not a thing to do with me.

And I am a Christian and an American.

And I am not taking life and have never taken the life of any person and I am not a terrorist.

And the thread topic is Apartheid Israel.

Does the poster have the mental intellect to address the thread topic?

My link is a legal analysis proving Israel practices Apartheid.

ISRAELI APARTHEID – A Basic Legal Perspective


Essay: Israeli Laws and Discrimination


All we have to do is look at the difference between how Jews and Palestinians are treated in Occupied Palestine and Israel and this is Apartheid.

We have an international crime called Apartheid and Israel commits it.

Do you even know what apartheid means, idiot?

Apartheid is separation based on race!

Israeli Arabs and Israel Jews can drive on the same roads. Palestinians cannot based on security.

If Israeli Arabs and Israeli Jews can walk the same sidewalks, learn in the same school, sit in the same bus seats, it's not separation based on race, therefor not apartheid!

But to try and reason with Anti-Israelis is like talking to the wall. waste of time and energy.

Where do you live you ******* terrorist? Because if you live in the US, when are you giving the natives back their land?