Is just that, nonsense.
What do those people who do that think they're doing?
I mean, seriously, what argument are they making?
What's the comparison are they making exactly?
First of all, why aren't they talking about "White on White crime?" That's just as much of a thing as their made up term referring to blacks.
Secondly, and most importantly, how or why are you comparing regular crime, where the perpetrators are sought out, usually caught and subsequently prosecuted to those thugs who are SUPPOSED to be UPHOLDING the law, getting away with blue murder, no pun intended, with absolutely no consequences.
Another one of their BOGUS arguments is when they inject some random numbers and/or stats about who's committing the most crime, as if THAT has something to do w/police brutality.
Who can make this make sense?
The only sense it makes, is that they're exercising their non-stop racism by throwing red-hearings to obfuscate the argument.
They don't believe #BlackLivesMatter, and they absolutely hate the fact that more and more whites, are coming to understand that they do, and that America has a GINORMOUS race problem, that they themselves need to resolve.
The bottom line is this folks, if the police are supposed to be upholding the law, then they're supposed to be held to HIGHER STANDARD than the rest of us. If and when they get caught in a crime, or perceived crime, they ought to sought out, investigate and held to account, including jailtime and/or even death sentence if warranted.
Not the current level of unbridled violence and accountability they're currently running around rampant with.
1. We don’t talk about white on white crime because it’s almost nonexistent. We also aren’t burning cities down because of it.
2. Then talk about police brutality, because it does effect everyone, not just blacks. Making it a racial thing does nothing for the argument since the numbers don’t back it up.
3. We are not injecting “random numbers”, you’re the ones talking about “black lives” and trying to limit the issue to only blacks. You’re not going around chanting “end police brutality”, you’re screaming “black lives matter”. Then if someone has the audacity to include others by saying “all lives matter”, meaning it’s an issue we all deal with when it comes to police brutality, they are shouted down as racists, fired from their jobs, and threatened by the BLM mob. This proves that your movement has nothing to do with actual police brutality, but rather a political movement based on tribalism and identity politics.
Yea, we all agree police should be held to a higher standard, but at the same time you can’t expect 100% of them to be perfect and never make a mistake, or to never “snap” on their job. They are people too, and they are doing what is easily the shittiest job in the world, patrolling the streets of crime infested America. They have to deal with drug addicts, rapists, thieves, gang members, and murderers on about a daily basis. If YOU think you can do better, maybe you should try being in their shoes. If the “black community” doesn’t like the way cops are, maybe more of them should become cops so they can patrol their own neighborhoods.