This Isn't Just An Attempt To Get Rid Of Trump, But A Massive Coverup

[night_son]

Okay....what are you unable to grasp?

The fixation on the Clintons, I guess.
.

Pavlov or Freud?

 

[Pete7469]

The only reason hitlery can possibly remain free is that she would drag down the entire DC corruptocracy.

Of course, some of the pictures I've seen of the old hag lately make it look to me like she is wearing heavy plate armor above her diaper. Either people in the establishment are plotting to get rid of her, or she was given a whole lot of money to deliver something she doesn't have access to any longer and someone is looking to collect.


.

 

[Erinwltr]

Dude, you have completely lost it.

I can see you are incapable of thinking logically.
You are ignorant to the truth and are easily led around by that ring in your nose.
Thanks for the input.

You are welcome and you are wrong.

Your opinion is duly noted.
But just saying I'm wrong is of no more value than a popcorn fart.

"I can see you are incapable of thinking logically."

You can't "see" a damn thing. Thank you for proving my point that you are wrong.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The truth is that the Dirty Dems are who meddled in the 2016 election with their fake Russian dossier.
Now that it is catching up to them, the Press is in a panic.

 

[night_son]

Ridiculous post. Yeah...the 70 y/o woman is a master criminal...

And your opinion of the 70 y/o man isn't lousy?

Jesus....you are a serious hypocrite.

Don't you ever get tired of these ridiculous conspiracy theories that are crazy just on the surface and batshit crazy when someone looks at the details. You didn't believe Osama Bin Laden was killed simply because Obama was the one who reported it. You said 2013 would be the worst year on record....because Mitt Romney (someone you now despise) wasn't elected in the 2012 election. Cut out the crazy.

Don't you ever tire of limiting your thinking within the meta-narrative spoonfed?

 

[Mac1958]

Okay....what are you unable to grasp?

The fixation on the Clintons, I guess.
.

I have no fixation with them.
If they choose to become the center of everything in the Beltway why must I ignore them.
I was happy when she was out wandering in the woods.
Now she's talking about running again, for fuck's sake.

She wouldn't get the nomination. The party is going in a different direction.
.

 

[BULLDOG]

The Crooked Hillary corruption is working itself out slowly. My God Jesus it is so beautiful that The Donald won in a landslide. When Brock Obama and Crooked Hillary are behind bars then justice has been served.

You call that a landslide? I'll bet you think he meant wouldn't instead of would too.

 

[mudwhistle]

Ridiculous post. Yeah...the 70 y/o woman is a master criminal...

And your opinion of the 70 y/o man isn't lousy?

Jesus....you are a serious hypocrite.

Don't you ever get tired of these ridiculous conspiracy theories that are crazy just on the surface and batshit crazy when someone looks at the details. You didn't believe Osama Bin Laden was killed simply because Obama was the one who reported it. You said 2013 would be the worst year on record....because Mitt Romney (someone you now despise) wasn't elected in the 2012 election. Cut out the crazy.

There's the rub.
You folks think dog crap on a car roof is proof of abuses.....as is two scoops of friggen ice cream.
But when Hillary has been admittedly caught doing things that have been spelled out in great detail as espionage in my annual security training classes, and she still gets off scot-free, I tend to question our Department of Justice, and anyone with half a brain would do the same.

 

[toobfreak]

It's unimaginable what the Clintons have cost this country since they first moved into the Whitehouse in the 90s. It seems that all that we have time for is media driven disasters with direct ties to Bill & Hill. It appears that this is a massive attempt to not only de-legitimize the Trump Administration but to also remove him from office. However, the fact is this is just an attempt to coverup for the crimes that Bill and Hillary have committed in the last several years.

Thanks to our spying capability nobody can hide the skeletons in their closets anymore. At least not hide them from a president or a Secretary of State who broke the law with zero thought for the consequences.

The media asks if Putin has something on Trump. Hogwash.
The real question is what does Hillary have on our leaders in Washington?

Hillary said if she hangs everyone else will hang with her.
What crimes are they trying to cover up?

July 18, 2018
If Not Russia, Who Is Hillary's 'Foreign Entity'?
By Joe Herring

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/07/if_not_russia_who_is_hillarys_foreign_entity.html

I've long said Hillary Clinton is insufficiently stupid to have believed she could operate an unsecured home server without compromising the security of any data transmitted through it or stored on it.

For just as long, it has been my contention that the server was the faucet through which she pumped information she was selling (yes, selling) to foreign entities, both public and private.

I.T. security protocols would've easily flagged attempts at intrusion if targeted toward the State Department's secure servers, through which then-secretary of state Clinton ought to have conducted business. Likewise, the transfer or copying of said information from a secure server is a detectable act with access being tightly controlled and records kept of who looked at what and when.

"Convenience," the excuse proffered by Clinton for not following even the most basic of security procedures, is, in a way, a rare instance of Clinton telling the truth, just not in the way she would have us believe.

She claims that it was more convenient to utilize a home server, using linked devices to conduct business. More truthfully, it was more convenient to offload state secrets absent the prying eyes of government I.T. security staff.

In his now infamous "exoneration presser," fired FBI director James Comey admitted that Clinton's server was "likely compromised" by foreign actors, but he also claimed there was "no evidence" of such an intrusion. During disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok's recent testimony, we discovered that this assertion was just another in a long line of brazen falsehoods tumbling out of Comey's mouth.

To drink a shot of liquor every time Comey says something that might be true might prove an entertaining parlor game for teetotalers. Beyond stating his name, there's precious little else he might say that is not suspect.

Rep. Louie Gohmert, (R-Texas) gave Strzok a moral shellacking over Strzok's extramarital affair with his co-worker and co-conspirator, Lisa Page, wondering aloud whether Strzok bore the same smirk he exhibited in that day's hearings when he looked his wife in the eye and lied to her about his fidelity.

A legitimate point, as the character of the smirking doyen was at issue, given that Strzok had spent the better part of that day swearing that his personal biases did not bear on his public duties, an assertion belied by both the evidence and common sense.

The resulting furor from Democrat members of the committee overshadowed the point Gohmert was making – that from Strzok's own mouth came yet more confirmation that Hillary Clinton's home server was compromised by a "foreign entity"; that there was indeed evidence of the intrusion and the theft of data; and that Comey had lied yet again, as he most certainly knew of this prior to his tortured-logic exoneration spectacle.

Representative Gohmert emphasized that the "foreign entity" responsible for placing the digital back door into Clinton's server was not Russia. "And this is a foreign entity, not related to Russia in the least!"

Who is this unnamed foreign entity? Gohmert knows but isn't saying, as that information is likely still classified. This revelation causes numerous questions to spring to mind, not the least of which, the timing of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's splashy unsealing of indictments against Russian targets over "election meddling," coming within hours of Strzok's damning admission.

The difficulty in unraveling the perfidy of the Clintons, the previous administration, and their overseas entanglements has always been the sheer scope of the corruption. When investigating one crime, ten more are discovered, leading to ten more for each of those. The high levels at which these crimes have been committed – President Obama's Cabinet and the president himself – compound the problem as their ideological allies within the permanent bureaucracy continue to obstruct, misdirect, and cover up in the name of "resistance."

It strains credulity to believe that the vast investigative resources of the federal government have been brought to bear against the Trump administration simply to enable a twice failed presidential candidate to avoid accountability for carelessly handling classified information.

While the Clintons have made their careers by enmeshing in criminality nearly everyone with whom they come in contact, their lives, politically and physically, are nearing the end. Even the risk of Clinton "bringing everyone down with me" is likely insufficient motivation for such herculean efforts to conceal and deceive both the public and the Trump administration.

It is my assertion that the Democratic Party, under the shadow leadership of President Obama, is mounting such a vigorous defense to hide its own involvement in the criminality that characterizes all things Clinton – most notably, the money-laundering operation known as the Clinton Foundation.

President Obama knew of Hillary's illicit server. He communicated with her on it. Both surely knew that any electronic device with even a tangential connection to either of them would be targeted by every hacker on the globe with nefarious purpose. Logic then would dictate that any information passed through, or placed on that server, was placed there to be picked up – a digital dead drop, if you will.

Politicians have made an art form out of evading accountability for bribery and financial malfeasance in office. It simply isn't conceivable that the unprecedented contortions of the Deep State displayed since the arrival of Trump would be triggered by a desire to conceal garden variety influence-peddling. However, as a reason sufficiently important to warrant committing hundreds of additional crimes to prevent its discovery, treason stands alone.


The same mindset that has no difficulty in short-circuiting the Constitution by enacting through judicial and executive fiat those policy aims they could never accomplish legislatively also has little problem with bypassing national security restrictions, if they believe that their purpose is sufficiently noble. We saw this in Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, selling nuclear secrets to the Soviets to maintain a "balance of power." Indeed, nearly every instance of domestic espionage in modern times has been rooted in this misshapen sense of moral imperative so fondly inculcated on the left.​

Without a doubt, Hillary's private server was both something they (The Obama team) were neither prepared to explain nor ABLE to explain, its existence being revealed totally by accident. From that came a massive flurry of lies by Clinton as she rushed to destroy 33,000 emails we only have HER word were not state property. Gowdy demonstrated with Comey before hearings this was clearly criminal activity which has never been satisfactorily prosecuted nor explained. How does a boob like Hillary Clinton: ex-wife of a president, ex-carpetbagger do-nothing senator become Sec. of State without some prior hold over Obama? Clearly Obama chose her not as best choice, but through some prior arrangement and deal to soft-walk her through a job she proved incompetent at as well as repayment in waiting to be soft-walked as well into the White House after Obama, that is, until the unthinkable happened and Trump and the voters came along!

I NEVER watch late night comedy yet the last three times I caught Stephen Colbert clicking through the channels over the last few months, TWO of those times he had, surprise, Bill Clinton on looking very wary, and the other time, Colbert merely ripping Trump to pieces. Clearly, there is a MASSIVE effort to discredit Trump while covering up some secret of the Clintons; if we ever discover what it is about the Clintons we do not know, it will be the most incredibly large political scandal in the history of this country whose cover-up goes clear to the top.

 

[mudwhistle]

Okay....what are you unable to grasp?

The fixation on the Clintons, I guess.
.

I have no fixation with them.
If they choose to become the center of everything in the Beltway why must I ignore them.
I was happy when she was out wandering in the woods.
Now she's talking about running again, for fuck's sake.

She wouldn't get the nomination. The party is going in a different direction.
.

That's never a problem for the Clintons.
They just figure they didn't cheat enough last time.
They literally stole the nomination from Bernie Sanders.
Just when you feel you've got them figured out they try something else.
Frankly, not one of the Democrat candidates would have gotten a security clearance when I got mine in the 80s.
Doesn't that bother you?
Would you trust your national security with someone who doesn't qualify for a Secret clearance, much less a Top Secret clearance?

 

[Mac1958]

Would you trust your national security with someone who doesn't qualify for a Secret clearance, much less a Top Secret clearance?

Compared to whom?

The guy in there now?
.

 

[candycorn]

Ridiculous post. Yeah...the 70 y/o woman is a master criminal...

And your opinion of the 70 y/o man isn't lousy?

Jesus....you are a serious hypocrite.

Don't you ever get tired of these ridiculous conspiracy theories that are crazy just on the surface and batshit crazy when someone looks at the details. You didn't believe Osama Bin Laden was killed simply because Obama was the one who reported it. You said 2013 would be the worst year on record....because Mitt Romney (someone you now despise) wasn't elected in the 2012 election. Cut out the crazy.

Don't you ever tire of limiting your thinking within the meta-narrative spoonfed?

Care to explain why she hasn't been convicted of one thing during this supposed 30 year crime spree?

 

[candycorn]

Ridiculous post. Yeah...the 70 y/o woman is a master criminal...

And your opinion of the 70 y/o man isn't lousy?

Jesus....you are a serious hypocrite.

Don't you ever get tired of these ridiculous conspiracy theories that are crazy just on the surface and batshit crazy when someone looks at the details. You didn't believe Osama Bin Laden was killed simply because Obama was the one who reported it. You said 2013 would be the worst year on record....because Mitt Romney (someone you now despise) wasn't elected in the 2012 election. Cut out the crazy.

There's the rub.
You folks think dog crap on a car roof is proof of abuses.....as is two scoops of friggen ice cream.
But when Hillary has been admittedly caught doing things that have been spelled out in great detail as espionage in my annual security training classes, and she still gets off scot-free, I tend to question our Department of Justice, and anyone with half a brain would do the same.

Care to comment on how she has not been convicted (much less charged) with a single crime in 30+ years of public life? Wait; let me guess...deep state....or are we going to go with the swamp today? I get confused between you guys and your made-up boogey men.

 

[mudwhistle]

Would you trust your national security with someone who doesn't qualify for a Secret clearance, much less a Top Secret clearance?

Compared to whom?

The guy in there now?
.

Your opinion doesn't really matter much when it comes to the truth.
The FBI is good at their jobs.
If Trump has committed crimes, they already know it.
He had to be investigated when he won.
That's why this investigation is nothing but a coverup.

My understanding is Bill Clinton never held a clearance, but a temp clearance because of his past.
Obama was probably the same.
Being tied in with terrorists and communists makes getting a clearance impossible.
However, being president means people make exceptions for you.
And trust me, if they had anything on Trump it would be leaked to the press and be front page news.

 

[mudwhistle]

Ridiculous post. Yeah...the 70 y/o woman is a master criminal...

And your opinion of the 70 y/o man isn't lousy?

Jesus....you are a serious hypocrite.

Don't you ever get tired of these ridiculous conspiracy theories that are crazy just on the surface and batshit crazy when someone looks at the details. You didn't believe Osama Bin Laden was killed simply because Obama was the one who reported it. You said 2013 would be the worst year on record....because Mitt Romney (someone you now despise) wasn't elected in the 2012 election. Cut out the crazy.

Don't you ever tire of limiting your thinking within the meta-narrative spoonfed?

Care to explain why she hasn't been convicted of one thing during this supposed 30 year crime spree?

Why wasn't' Al Capone convicted of anything other than tax evasion?

 

[Mac1958]

Would you trust your national security with someone who doesn't qualify for a Secret clearance, much less a Top Secret clearance?

Compared to whom?

The guy in there now?
.

Your opinion doesn't really matter much when it comes to the truth.
The FBI is good at their jobs.
If Trump has committed crimes, they already know it.
He had to be investigated when he won.
That's why this investigation is nothing but a coverup.

My understanding is Bill Clinton never held a clearance, but a temp clearance because of his past.
Obama was probably the same.
Being tied in with terrorists and communists makes getting a clearance impossible.
However, being president means people make exceptions for you.
And trust me, if they had anything on Trump it would be leaked to the press and be front page news.

Yep, it's just my opinion.
.

 

[night_son]

Ridiculous post. Yeah...the 70 y/o woman is a master criminal...

And your opinion of the 70 y/o man isn't lousy?

Jesus....you are a serious hypocrite.

Don't you ever get tired of these ridiculous conspiracy theories that are crazy just on the surface and batshit crazy when someone looks at the details. You didn't believe Osama Bin Laden was killed simply because Obama was the one who reported it. You said 2013 would be the worst year on record....because Mitt Romney (someone you now despise) wasn't elected in the 2012 election. Cut out the crazy.

Don't you ever tire of limiting your thinking within the meta-narrative spoonfed?

Care to explain why she hasn't been convicted of one thing during this supposed 30 year crime spree?

Do you understand the concept of programmed response? A criminal isn't one until proven guilty, even if the evidentiary trail is chartreuse and leads to Her front door. Time will tell the true story. However, simply repeating the MSM mouthpiece is not patriotic service to our nation. Rather, it is--particularly in this case--at least anti-patriotic, when in doing so, you campaign for without a shred of proof or conviction, the downfall of our elected commander in chief. You so desire he be labelled Caesar at the Rubicon. Perhaps he ought to be, and then cross it.

 

[gipper]

Ridiculous post. Yeah...the 70 y/o woman is a master criminal...

And your opinion of the 70 y/o man isn't lousy?

Jesus....you are a serious hypocrite.

Don't you ever get tired of these ridiculous conspiracy theories that are crazy just on the surface and batshit crazy when someone looks at the details. You didn't believe Osama Bin Laden was killed simply because Obama was the one who reported it. You said 2013 would be the worst year on record....because Mitt Romney (someone you now despise) wasn't elected in the 2012 election. Cut out the crazy.

How is it a conspiracy when it is known Cankles used an unprotected computer server as SOS, that that server was compromised by a foriegn entity, and the Clinton's are well known criminals?

 

[mudwhistle]

Ridiculous post. Yeah...the 70 y/o woman is a master criminal...

And your opinion of the 70 y/o man isn't lousy?

Jesus....you are a serious hypocrite.

Don't you ever get tired of these ridiculous conspiracy theories that are crazy just on the surface and batshit crazy when someone looks at the details. You didn't believe Osama Bin Laden was killed simply because Obama was the one who reported it. You said 2013 would be the worst year on record....because Mitt Romney (someone you now despise) wasn't elected in the 2012 election. Cut out the crazy.

There's the rub.
You folks think dog crap on a car roof is proof of abuses.....as is two scoops of friggen ice cream.
But when Hillary has been admittedly caught doing things that have been spelled out in great detail as espionage in my annual security training classes, and she still gets off scot-free, I tend to question our Department of Justice, and anyone with half a brain would do the same.

Care to comment on how she has not been convicted (much less charged) with a single crime in 30+ years of public life? Wait; let me guess...deep state....or are we going to go with the swamp today? I get confused between you guys and your made-up boogey men.

Other than alot of coercion, blackmail, bribery, and being lucky when it comes to witnesses committing suicide of being shot sitting at traffic lights, I can't think of a single reason why?

 

[mudwhistle]

Ridiculous post. Yeah...the 70 y/o woman is a master criminal...

And your opinion of the 70 y/o man isn't lousy?

Jesus....you are a serious hypocrite.

Don't you ever get tired of these ridiculous conspiracy theories that are crazy just on the surface and batshit crazy when someone looks at the details. You didn't believe Osama Bin Laden was killed simply because Obama was the one who reported it. You said 2013 would be the worst year on record....because Mitt Romney (someone you now despise) wasn't elected in the 2012 election. Cut out the crazy.

How is it a conspiracy when it is known Cankles used an unprotected computer server as SOS, that that server was compromised by a foriegn entity, and the Clinton's are well known criminals?

As long as that server was out there it was a target, and nothing on that server was secret.