Not just Signal: 6 times Donald Trump's information security has raised eyebrows

[Coyote]

I don't have to keep telling Myself anything. The proof is in the data.

This is nothing but a bitch-fest by the left because they can't hang anything on this administration.

Truthfully, the right would be best served to just point at this kind of information and snicker at their little dicks and then go on with life; ignoring the entire thing.

Which is what I am going to do starting right now.

A serious and careless security breach like that is not a “bitch fest”. Clinton was crucified for less.

Amateurs, clowns and children!

 

[playtime]

Private Data and Passwords of Senior U.S. Security Officials Found Online​

Donald Trump's most important security advisers used Signal to discuss an imminent military strike. Now, reporting by DER SPIEGEL has found that the contact data of some of those officials, including mobile phone numbers, is freely accessible on the internet.

By Patrick Beuth, Jörg Diehl, Roman Höfner, Roman Lehberger, Friederike Röhreke und Fidelius Schmid
27.03.2025, 10.33 Uhr

Pete Hegseth, Mike Waltz, Tulsi Gabbard: Private Data and Passwords of Senior U.S. Security Officials Found Online

 

[toobfreak]

You can’t fix a vulnerability that is caused by the incompetence (and dare I say it, arrogance) of the people you surround yourself with.

Yep. Biden proved that over and over again hundreds of times. I don't remember your being alarmed.

This was anything but smooth and thorough.

Sure it was. If not for the forced leak, it would have been a million times better than Biden's Afghan puillout! Can you link me to your concerns over that?

We’ve now angered a strategic intelligence partner in the Middle East, and not for the first time, shown we can’t be trusted to appropriately handle sensitive matters.

Of course, that is why it was leaked. Trump will fix it.

According to tbe article,

I don't give "articles" much credence.

These are amateurs,

Yep, it is of no concern to me, Trump will fix it. America has seen what the /professionals/ like Biden, Hillary, and Obumma do, and we have rejected them. America knows better now. We are far better off with a few innocent mistakes by well-meaning patriots than we are the scurrilous thievery and bad actors of the seasoned democrats whose alliance is solely in the corner of European and Asian globalists.

 

[Hollie]

‘Trump and his administration raised eyebrows about how they handled sensitive national security information long before his top national security advisor added a journalist to a Signal chat. Security experts say sharing detailed plans for attacking the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen with a journalist from the Atlantic is part of a larger problem involving Trump and his security team’s overall handling of sensitive information.

“The sloppiness of their security is pervasive,” Kori Schake, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute,” told USA TODAY. Schake said CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's claims that the time, date, and weapons used were not classified information is “staggering.”

Mike Williams, an international relations professor at Syracuse University who has consulted the Department of Defense, said repeated national security lapses can create a culture of complacency at best or neglect at worse. “Or it creates a culture whereby this becomes permissible and then you have more and more such leakages and then it’s only a matter of time before something gets out there,” Williams said. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on Trump's record on information security.

Not just Signal: 6 times Donald Trump's information security has raised eyebrows

Is the Signal security lapse part of a larger pattern under President Donald Trump? Experts say yes.

www.usatoday.com

Sloppy, negligent, incompetent, irresponsible – this is the failed Trump ‘administration,’ its mishandling of sensitive national security information places American service members at risk, along with the rest of the American people.

Trump is unfit to be president.

Sorry sweety, Biden’s not coming back.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

I don't have to keep telling Myself anything. The proof is in the data.

This is nothing but a bitch-fest by the left because they can't hang anything on this administration.

Truthfully, the right would be best served to just point at this kind of information and snicker at their little dicks and then go on with life; ignoring the entire thing.

Which is what I am going to do starting right now.

Waltz invited the journalist: he admitted it.

Yes, material no one should know about out of the chat group was transmitted.

And, then, Nixon-esque, the cover up began.

Darkwind, buddy, you are doing your side no good.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Sorry sweety, Biden’s not coming back.

That's why this admin has to do much better: Biden's gone.

 

[theHawk]

‘Trump and his administration raised eyebrows about how they handled sensitive national security information long before his top national security advisor added a journalist to a Signal chat. Security experts say sharing detailed plans for attacking the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen with a journalist from the Atlantic is part of a larger problem involving Trump and his security team’s overall handling of sensitive information.

“The sloppiness of their security is pervasive,” Kori Schake, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute,” told USA TODAY. Schake said CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's claims that the time, date, and weapons used were not classified information is “staggering.”

Mike Williams, an international relations professor at Syracuse University who has consulted the Department of Defense, said repeated national security lapses can create a culture of complacency at best or neglect at worse. “Or it creates a culture whereby this becomes permissible and then you have more and more such leakages and then it’s only a matter of time before something gets out there,” Williams said. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on Trump's record on information security.

Not just Signal: 6 times Donald Trump's information security has raised eyebrows

Is the Signal security lapse part of a larger pattern under President Donald Trump? Experts say yes.

www.usatoday.com

Sloppy, negligent, incompetent, irresponsible – this is the failed Trump ‘administration,’ its mishandling of sensitive national security information places American service members at risk, along with the rest of the American people.

Trump is unfit to be president.

Oh boy, “experts say”….


Y’all keep falling for the same shit.

 

[Coyote]

Of course, that is why it was leaked. Trump will fix it.

Nothing was leaked, that idiot Waltz added the editor to a high level discussion that would normally take place in a secure location person or strict security protocols. NOT signal.

I don't give "articles" much credence.

Then where do you get your information? I doubt you were there in person.

Yep, it is of no concern to me, Trump will fix it. America has seen what the /professionals/ like Biden, Hillary, and Obumma do, and we have rejected them. America knows better now. We are far better off with a few innocent mistakes by well-meaning patriots than we are the scurrilous thievery and bad actors of the seasoned democrats whose alliance is solely in the corner of European and Asian globalists.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

‘Trump and his administration raised eyebrows about how they handled sensitive national security information long before his top national security advisor added a journalist to a Signal chat. Security experts say sharing detailed plans for attacking the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen with a journalist from the Atlantic is part of a larger problem involving Trump and his security team’s overall handling of sensitive information.

“The sloppiness of their security is pervasive,” Kori Schake, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute,” told USA TODAY. Schake said CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's claims that the time, date, and weapons used were not classified information is “staggering.”

Mike Williams, an international relations professor at Syracuse University who has consulted the Department of Defense, said repeated national security lapses can create a culture of complacency at best or neglect at worse. “Or it creates a culture whereby this becomes permissible and then you have more and more such leakages and then it’s only a matter of time before something gets out there,” Williams said. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on Trump's record on information security.

Not just Signal: 6 times Donald Trump's information security has raised eyebrows

Is the Signal security lapse part of a larger pattern under President Donald Trump? Experts say yes.

www.usatoday.com

Sloppy, negligent, incompetent, irresponsible – this is the failed Trump ‘administration,’ its mishandling of sensitive national security information places American service members at risk, along with the rest of the American people.

Trump is unfit to be president.

That isn't Trump being careless, that bureaucrats in the government leaking classified information to undermine Trump.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

I don't think so, Will Bill.

The is the incredibly low caliber of people he has hired.

 

[toobfreak]

Nothing was leaked,

Of course it was. Do you think Waltz just randomly added this editor or picked his name out of a hat? Someone steered Waltz into doing it and once the Atlantic got hold of the signal conversation, HE leaked it.

Then where do you get your information? I doubt you were there in person.

I get most of my information from people who WERE there, or at least are directly or indirectly involved in events either in some official capacity or former official capacity still with connections to their sources. Where that is not possible, I get info from multiple sources with a historically solid track record who when tested against other reliable sources, all give a similar picture of the story. I do not use sources who merely "pick up" stories off the wire then repeat and copy them.