Richard Dawkins is arguably the modern poster boy for Charles Darwin. However, a key difference radically separates the two men. Darwin b...
www.goodreads.com
It's really that simple, everything that is, came to be what it is, because nothing decided to write genetic code
The problem with your argument here is that, and let's assume God created everything, that either God was created from nothing, or God wasn't even created.
So, if God wasn't created, then things being created from nothing is more plausible than something not even being created.
If God was created, then God was created from nothing. Which means things can be created from nothing, which means you don't need a God.
Or, God was created from something, who created God? Another God? And who created that God?
Your belief system is just as wacky, if not more so, than atheists' belief system.