This is the republicans denial again.

[Colin norris]

Read this and tell me how proud you are.

 

[bendog]

well I don't do facebook since they banned President trump.

seriously I don't do facebook for professional reasons. lol

 

[Auld Phart]

Trumps 'insurrection' IS a conspiracy theory.

 

[Anathema]

Read this and tell me how proud you are.

When you protect SCUM, there is a reasonable chance that you are going to end up getting beaten up and/or having to beat people up. Doesn’t matter if the scum you’re protecting are Mafiosos or Politicians.

 

[John T. Ford]

Trumps 'insurrection' IS a conspiracy theory.

That's right.

And, Kevin McCarthy knows it.

This isn't Republican denial as our Fake News Leftist friend post in the OP.

It is actually Republican reality.

 

[John T. Ford]

When you protect SCUM, there is a reasonable chance that you are going to end up getting beaten up and/or having to beat people up. Doesn’t matter if the scum you’re protecting are Mafiosos or Politicians.

Lot's of people have had their asses kicked by Black LIES Matter and ANTIFA.

This asshole isn't anything special.

 

[Mac1958]

Read this and tell me how proud you are.

I assume you've seen the videos of what these thugs were doing and saying to the cops.

Trumpsters' true colors really came out that day.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Read this and tell me how proud you are.

There was NO insurrection, hardly anyone was even trying to overthrow anything, 99% of the people inside the Capital building had no weapons at all.

This a stupid Democrat claim that died long ago.

 

[Obiwan]

Read this and tell me how proud you are.

Occupy Democrats - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

• Overall, we rate Occupy Democrats Questionable due to far left-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies, and the publication of fake news as evidence by numerous failed fact checks.

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracies, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: FAR LEFT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Read this and tell me how proud you are.

There was NO insurrection, hardly anyone was even trying to overthrow anything, 99% of the people inside the Capital building had no weapons at all.

This a stupid Democrat claim that died long ago.

Again, explained over and over, you don't need weapons like guns when you have the sheer numbers and your opposing force is vastly outnumbered...and unwilling to use deadly force..well, except in one case.
But, short knives, bear spray (and other sprays), flagsticks (some broken off to form spears), and other bludgeons are quite effective when you have the numbers. Everyone who was there that day was there to
interrupt a Constitutional process aimed at overturning a free and fair election. One of the cornerstones of our democracy. And maybe if the example of Babbitt being shot wasn't a bit of a deterrent to the people who
were literally steps from the House floor, they might have succeeded in forcing the majority of the politicians to throw out the election results.

Yep. Insurrection. Treason. Sedition. I don't care how many years it takes. How many hours of video footage has to be gone through. ANYONE who was there that day needs to answer for the lie they supported.
Starting with Individual #1. Who got exactly what he wanted in getting his lemmings to storm the Capitol..and then went back to the WH to watch it like the cowardly pussy he is.

 

[$ecular#eckler]

I am so proud that I am about ejaculate in the public library from reading that - excellent meme.

 

[otto105]

Trumps 'insurrection' IS a conspiracy theory.

That's right.

And, Kevin McCarthy knows it.

This isn't Republican denial as our Fake News Leftist friend post in the OP.

It is actually Republican reality.

I'm sure that you're going to love the House Select Committee on the 1/6 insurrection.

I know I am.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Read this and tell me how proud you are.

There was NO insurrection, hardly anyone was even trying to overthrow anything, 99% of the people inside the Capital building had no weapons at all.

This a stupid Democrat claim that died long ago.

Again, explained over and over, you don't need weapons like guns when you have the sheer numbers and your opposing force is vastly outnumbered...and unwilling to use deadly force..well, except in one case.
But, short knives, bear spray (and other sprays), flagsticks (some broken off to form spears), and other bludgeons are quite effective when you have the numbers. Everyone who was there that day was there to
interrupt a Constitutional process aimed at overturning a free and fair election. One of the cornerstones of our democracy. And maybe if the example of Babbitt being shot wasn't a bit of a deterrent to the people who
were literally steps from the House floor, they might have succeeded in forcing the majority of the politicians to throw out the election results.

Yep. Insurrection. Treason. Sedition. I don't care how many years it takes. How many hours of video footage has to be gone through. ANYONE who was there that day needs to answer for the lie they supported.
Starting with Individual #1. Who got exactly what he wanted in getting his lemmings to storm the Capitol..and then went back to the WH to watch it like the cowardly pussy he is.

Then you have nothing to show a insurrection actually took place, thank you for clearing that up.

 

[John T. Ford]

I'm sure that you're going to love the House Select Committee on the 1/6 insurrection.

I know I am.

Do you think they will finally charge someone with insurrection?

I mean if there was an insurrection and all should they charge someone with insurrection?

 

[John T. Ford]

Read this and tell me how proud you are.

There was NO insurrection, hardly anyone was even trying to overthrow anything, 99% of the people inside the Capital building had no weapons at all.

This a stupid Democrat claim that died long ago.

Again, explained over and over, you don't need weapons like guns when you have the sheer numbers and your opposing force is vastly outnumbered...and unwilling to use deadly force..well, except in one case.
But, short knives, bear spray (and other sprays), flagsticks (some broken off to form spears), and other bludgeons are quite effective when you have the numbers. Everyone who was there that day was there to
interrupt a Constitutional process aimed at overturning a free and fair election. One of the cornerstones of our democracy. And maybe if the example of Babbitt being shot wasn't a bit of a deterrent to the people who
were literally steps from the House floor, they might have succeeded in forcing the majority of the politicians to throw out the election results.

Yep. Insurrection. Treason. Sedition. I don't care how many years it takes. How many hours of video footage has to be gone through. ANYONE who was there that day needs to answer for the lie they supported.
Starting with Individual #1. Who got exactly what he wanted in getting his lemmings to storm the Capitol..and then went back to the WH to watch it like the cowardly pussy he is.

Then you have nothing to show a insurrection actually took place, thank you for clearing that up.

But, but, but ....

The Fake News MSM told them there was an insurrection so there has to be an insurrection ... Right?

 

[otto105]

I'm sure that you're going to love the House Select Committee on the 1/6 insurrection.

I know I am.

Do you think they will finally charge someone with insurrection?

I mean if there was an insurrection and all should they charge someone with insurrection?

Seem like a good thing for the former president's oath keeper's.

 

[John T. Ford]

Do you think they will finally charge someone with insurrection?

I mean if there was an insurrection and all should they charge someone with insurrection?

Seem like a good thing for the former president's oath keeper's.

I know why you dodged my question.

You guys are so phony.

 

[Tax Man]

Trump will be charged in time. First the senate has to overcome mitch the bitch and his refusal to have a comission to investigate the entire thing.

 

[John T. Ford]

Trump will be charged in time. First the senate has to overcome mitch the bitch and his refusal to have a comission to investigate the entire thing.

You dumbasses have been saying that for 5 years now on so many different fake conspiracies that I have lost count now.

Let us know what the voices are telling you in that Alt Left Reality of Fake news you live.

 

[itfitzme]

Read this and tell me how proud you are.

Occupy Democrats - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

• Overall, we rate Occupy Democrats Questionable due to far left-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies, and the publication of fake news as evidence by numerous failed fact checks.

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracies, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: FAR LEFT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

"Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is an American website founded in 2015 by editor Dave Van Zandt.[1] The website has been described as an amateur effort to rate news media sources based on factual accuracy and political bias"

"Poynter Institute notes, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific.""


Still doesn't change this;