This is a woman on death row AZ who sure sounds innocent

Robert W

Former Democrat but long term Republican.
Gold Supporting Member
Sep 9, 2022
21,322
9,843
1,138
I was checking on women on death row, specifically the woman from England in prison in Indonesia who ran drugs and got caught and sentenced to death. Is she still alive I wondered? She sure is. She seems to not now be likely to face the firing squad but since she was put into jail there, she has lived daily knowing that all they have to do is notify her within 72 hours she will be shot and then she will die at gunfire. Sandiford is her name in case you want to google her to learn more.
Anyway, this other issue I am now talking about shows up. Guess the algorithm did it. This is the case of a woman from Australia now in prison in AZ who was sentenced to death. She was convicted of murdering her child. (hell women murder their children daily by aborting them) but in this case she says in the interview you will see, that she is totally innocent. Lisa Cunningham is her name.

Now this came from the press.

"A former suburban Adelaide mum, who could be the first Australian woman to be executed in the US if found guilty of her stepdaughter’s death, says she is “crying” her trial will now be delayed more than 18 months.

Lisa Marie Cunningham, 48, is charged with killing 7-year-old Sanaa in Arizona in February 2017 in one of the most perplexing and sensational child murder cases to come before a US court.

“I’m crying,” she told The Advertiser. “I’ve had some serious health problems because of the condition of detainment and treatment."

She says she did not kill her child.

Watch the video. Then is she guilty?

 
I was checking on women on death row, specifically the woman from England in prison in Indonesia who ran drugs and got caught and sentenced to death. Is she still alive I wondered? She sure is. She seems to not now be likely to face the firing squad but since she was put into jail there, she has lived daily knowing that all they have to do is notify her within 72 hours she will be shot and then she will die at gunfire. Sandiford is her name in case you want to google her to learn more.
Anyway, this other issue I am now talking about shows up. Guess the algorithm did it. This is the case of a woman from Australia now in prison in AZ who was sentenced to death. She was convicted of murdering her child. (hell women murder their children daily by aborting them) but in this case she says in the interview you will see, that she is totally innocent. Lisa Cunningham is her name.

Now this came from the press.

"A former suburban Adelaide mum, who could be the first Australian woman to be executed in the US if found guilty of her stepdaughter’s death, says she is “crying” her trial will now be delayed more than 18 months.

Lisa Marie Cunningham, 48, is charged with killing 7-year-old Sanaa in Arizona in February 2017 in one of the most perplexing and sensational child murder cases to come before a US court.

“I’m crying,” she told The Advertiser. “I’ve had some serious health problems because of the condition of detainment and treatment."

She says she did not kill her child.

Watch the video. Then is she guilty?


The article doesn't provide enough information to make a judgement about this case. I trust juries. I'm against the death penalty.
 
I was checking on women on death row, specifically the woman from England in prison in Indonesia who ran drugs and got caught and sentenced to death. Is she still alive I wondered? She sure is. She seems to not now be likely to face the firing squad but since she was put into jail there, she has lived daily knowing that all they have to do is notify her within 72 hours she will be shot and then she will die at gunfire. Sandiford is her name in case you want to google her to learn more.
Anyway, this other issue I am now talking about shows up. Guess the algorithm did it. This is the case of a woman from Australia now in prison in AZ who was sentenced to death. She was convicted of murdering her child. (hell women murder their children daily by aborting them) but in this case she says in the interview you will see, that she is totally innocent. Lisa Cunningham is her name.

Now this came from the press.

"A former suburban Adelaide mum, who could be the first Australian woman to be executed in the US if found guilty of her stepdaughter’s death, says she is “crying” her trial will now be delayed more than 18 months.

Lisa Marie Cunningham, 48, is charged with killing 7-year-old Sanaa in Arizona in February 2017 in one of the most perplexing and sensational child murder cases to come before a US court.

“I’m crying,” she told The Advertiser. “I’ve had some serious health problems because of the condition of detainment and treatment."

She says she did not kill her child.

Watch the video. Then is she guilty?


Regarding the first case you cited: If you run drugs in a foreign nation, especially a Muslim nation, which Indonesia is, you can expect the death penalty. To prevent doing this, don't run drugs in foreign countries, especially ones with death penalties for doing just that.
As for the second case, no matter how innocent she may sound, we, yourself included didn't sit in on the entire trial and weren't on the jury. They heard from the prosecuting attorney and the defense attorney, as well as having been shown any and all evidence on the case. Women in the US were very rarely given a death penalty and for that matter, weren't often convicted of murder. A good example is the old Lizzy Borden case. The jury just couldn't imagine a woman axe-murdering her parents, so they acquitted her. A modern day re-evaluation of the entire case, including the transcripts from the trial have led attorneys to re-evaluate her case and come to the conclusion that it couldn't have been anyone else but her.
 
The article doesn't provide enough information to make a judgement about this case. I trust juries. I'm against the death penalty.

Here is more on the Cunningham case:
{...
Sanaa, who was diagnosed with schizophrenia and other behavioural disorders, died four hours after she was taken to hospital in February 2017.
...
Prosecutors allege she died from a sepsis infection in Phoenix Children’s Hospital from injuries related to the neglectful conditions she lived in, such as being restrained with plastic ties, a makeshift straitjacket and shackles, as well as being locked in a laundry room or outside.
...
However the mum-of-four has claimed Sanaa died from pneumonia and medication side effects, The Advertiser reported.
...}

If the child did have schizophrenia, then restraints may have been warranted?
And the death clearly was not deliberate, even if neglectful in some ways.
So at worst it should have been manslaughter, which does not have a death penalty.
NOT first degree, deliberate homicide, with a death penalty.
 
Regarding the first case you cited: If you run drugs in a foreign nation, especially a Muslim nation, which Indonesia is, you can expect the death penalty. To prevent doing this, don't run drugs in foreign countries, especially ones with death penalties for doing just that.
As for the second case, no matter how innocent she may sound, we, yourself included didn't sit in on the entire trial and weren't on the jury. They heard from the prosecuting attorney and the defense attorney, as well as having been shown any and all evidence on the case. Women in the US were very rarely given a death penalty and for that matter, weren't often convicted of murder. A good example is the old Lizzy Borden case. The jury just couldn't imagine a woman axe-murdering her parents, so they acquitted her. A modern day re-evaluation of the entire case, including the transcripts from the trial have led attorneys to re-evaluate her case and come to the conclusion that it couldn't have been anyone else but her.

I disagree.
Laws and penalties are only arbitrary in a dictatorship.
In a valid government, then the authority to punish only comes from the need to defend the rights of others.
So there is no inherent legal authority to actually ever execute at all. One a person is imprisoned, there no longer is any risk to others, to the need to execute is gone.
Even more so over drugs, which are NOT at all against Islam.
The Hashesins were notorious for being heavy users of hashish.
{...
The Assassins were founded by Hassan-i Sabbah. The state was formed in 1090 after the capture of Alamut Castle in the Alborz mountain range of Persia, which served as the Assassins' headquarters. The Alamut and Lambsar castles became the foundation of a network of Isma'ili fortresses throughout Persia and Syria that formed the backbone of Assassin power, and included Syrian strongholds at Masyaf, Abu Qubays, al-Qadmus and al-Kahf. The Western world was introduced to the Assassins by the works of Marco Polo[4] who understood the name as deriving from the word hashish.[5][6][7]
...}
 
I used to be supporitve of the death penalty if there is irrefutable evidence or a confession. I have since evolved on the issue. We should not play G-d. When the state does so it makes such a decision on behalf of all its citizens. With age comes wisdom and there are a number of issues that I have with the death penalty from the moral, to concerns with justice and even spiritial.resistance. G-d did command us not to kill although there are.example.of it in the Torah. We humans must cherish life, even that of the evil doer.
 
Here is more on the Cunningham case:
{...
Sanaa, who was diagnosed with schizophrenia and other behavioural disorders, died four hours after she was taken to hospital in February 2017.
...
Prosecutors allege she died from a sepsis infection in Phoenix Children’s Hospital from injuries related to the neglectful conditions she lived in, such as being restrained with plastic ties, a makeshift straitjacket and shackles, as well as being locked in a laundry room or outside.
...
However the mum-of-four has claimed Sanaa died from pneumonia and medication side effects, The Advertiser reported.
...}

If the child did have schizophrenia, then restraints may have been warranted?
And the death clearly was not deliberate, even if neglectful in some ways.
So at worst it should have been manslaughter, which does not have a death penalty.
NOT first degree, deliberate homicide, with a death penalty.
I was under the impression that sepsis is diagnosed through blood tests. There should not be any ambiguity about whether or not the cause of death was sepsis.
 
IMG_3630.gif
 
I was checking on women on death row, specifically the woman from England in prison in Indonesia who ran drugs and got caught and sentenced to death. Is she still alive I wondered? She sure is. She seems to not now be likely to face the firing squad but since she was put into jail there, she has lived daily knowing that all they have to do is notify her within 72 hours she will be shot and then she will die at gunfire. Sandiford is her name in case you want to google her to learn more.
Anyway, this other issue I am now talking about shows up. Guess the algorithm did it. This is the case of a woman from Australia now in prison in AZ who was sentenced to death. She was convicted of murdering her child. (hell women murder their children daily by aborting them) but in this case she says in the interview you will see, that she is totally innocent. Lisa Cunningham is her name.

Now this came from the press.

"A former suburban Adelaide mum, who could be the first Australian woman to be executed in the US if found guilty of her stepdaughter’s death, says she is “crying” her trial will now be delayed more than 18 months.

Lisa Marie Cunningham, 48, is charged with killing 7-year-old Sanaa in Arizona in February 2017 in one of the most perplexing and sensational child murder cases to come before a US court.

“I’m crying,” she told The Advertiser. “I’ve had some serious health problems because of the condition of detainment and treatment."

She says she did not kill her child.

Watch the video. Then is she guilty?

Surely it is in the wider and best interests to let someone that fat and unpleasing to look at , fade away peacefully .
Think of the amount of methane she produces and the fright she gives to little chiildren should they catch sight of her .
Definitely a modern day type of war criminal .
 
I used to be supporitve of the death penalty if there is irrefutable evidence or a confession. I have since evolved on the issue. We should not play G-d. When the state does so it makes such a decision on behalf of all its citizens. With age comes wisdom and there are a number of issues that I have with the death penalty from the moral, to concerns with justice and even spiritial.resistance. G-d did command us not to kill although there are.example.of it in the Torah. We humans must cherish life, even that of the evil doer.

People have confessed to things they didn't do. A confession doesn't make one guilty. Cops have done coerced confessions by using threats, depriving people of sleep, food, water, whatever, to get them to confess.
 
People have confessed to things they didn't do. A confession doesn't make one guilty. Cops have done coerced confessions by using threats, depriving people of sleep, food, water, whatever, to get them to confess.
People have been convicted, spent decades in prison for that crime, only later to be cleared and compensated in the millions of dollars in areas this is allowed. Why do this? Watch true life film on the investigations, the long long interrogations, the tone of the detectives and more and learn that we have executed innocent people. I want the system improved but not changed so that the guilty don't get executed. Say one way to think of this is name me any person who never died? How can you stay alive forever? Executions just speed up the fatal time till you die. The entire prison system reminds me of the ages where anybody convicted could be burned at the stake.
 
Exposed yourself as a Grade A fucktard with your comment about abortion. It is not murder by the very definition of the word. Words have meaning. Grow up and pick up a book
 
Exposed yourself as a Grade A fucktard with your comment about abortion. It is not murder by the very definition of the word. Words have meaning. Grow up and pick up a book
Some posters defend children. But not you.
 
I was checking on women on death row, specifically the woman from England in prison in Indonesia who ran drugs and got caught and sentenced to death. Is she still alive I wondered? She sure is. She seems to not now be likely to face the firing squad but since she was put into jail there, she has lived daily knowing that all they have to do is notify her within 72 hours she will be shot and then she will die at gunfire. Sandiford is her name in case you want to google her to learn more.
Anyway, this other issue I am now talking about shows up. Guess the algorithm did it. This is the case of a woman from Australia now in prison in AZ who was sentenced to death. She was convicted of murdering her child. (hell women murder their children daily by aborting them) but in this case she says in the interview you will see, that she is totally innocent. Lisa Cunningham is her name.

Now this came from the press.

"A former suburban Adelaide mum, who could be the first Australian woman to be executed in the US if found guilty of her stepdaughter’s death, says she is “crying” her trial will now be delayed more than 18 months.

Lisa Marie Cunningham, 48, is charged with killing 7-year-old Sanaa in Arizona in February 2017 in one of the most perplexing and sensational child murder cases to come before a US court.

“I’m crying,” she told The Advertiser. “I’ve had some serious health problems because of the condition of detainment and treatment."

She says she did not kill her child.

Watch the video. Then is she guilty?


She must be innocent. She's WHITE!!!!

You are being disingenuous, Mormon Bob2, she wasn't this child's mother, she was her stepmother.


This is the first time Lisa has spoken publicly since she and her husband, Germayne, were arrested in September and charged with first-degree murder. Prosecutors allege they are responsible for the cruel neglect and abuse of Germayne’s daughter – Lisa’s step-daughter – seven-year-old Sanaa. The prosecution facts make for tough reading. They say the little girl was placed in a straightjacket, restrained with zip ties and handcuffs, and neglected to the point where serious wounds – including a bone deep cut on her foot – were not properly treated.
 
She must be innocent. She's WHITE!!!!

You are being disingenuous, Mormon Bob2, she wasn't this child's mother, she was her stepmother.


This is the first time Lisa has spoken publicly since she and her husband, Germayne, were arrested in September and charged with first-degree murder. Prosecutors allege they are responsible for the cruel neglect and abuse of Germayne’s daughter – Lisa’s step-daughter – seven-year-old Sanaa. The prosecution facts make for tough reading. They say the little girl was placed in a straightjacket, restrained with zip ties and handcuffs, and neglected to the point where serious wounds – including a bone deep cut on her foot – were not properly treated.
Sounds like her child is as black as Harris is. So you say guilty.
 
Except it wasn't her child. She was a "Step-monster".

This child died of severe child neglect. That makes both her and her husband responsible.
JoeB131, you are never consistent. First you approve the murder of Ashli Babbitt. You approve the cop that murdered her. Here you come to call this woman a Step monster.
And in the case of this child you feel very bad. I wish you were consistent. Another puzzle is the man raised hell with the cops, you recall the cop went to prison. But the criminal you sided with The law enforcement you are against. A cop murders using a gun, fine with you. A cop kneels on a man on the street and to you he must be in prison. Why are you so inconsistent?
 
JoeB131, you are never consistent. First you approve the murder of Ashli Babbitt. You approve the cop that murdered her. Here you come to call this woman a Step monster.
And in the case of this child you feel very bad. I wish you were consistent. Another puzzle is the man raised hell with the cops, you recall the cop went to prison. But the criminal you sided with The law enforcement you are against. A cop murders using a gun, fine with you. A cop kneels on a man on the street and to you he must be in prison. Why are you so inconsistent?

I'm very consistent.

A disabled child shouldn't be abused to death.

A man shouldn't be strangled to death over an offense they should have just wrote a summons for.

A stupid bitch who joins and angry mob threatening members of Congress because he candidate lost an election has no one to blame but herself when she takes a dirt nap. She had dozens of opportunities to say, "You know, this is a terrible idea".
 
I'm very consistent.

A disabled child shouldn't be abused to death.

A man shouldn't be strangled to death over an offense they should have just wrote a summons for.

A stupid bitch who joins and angry mob threatening members of Congress because he candidate lost an election has no one to blame but herself when she takes a dirt nap. She had dozens of opportunities to say, "You know, this is a terrible idea".
Let's reword that to be honest.
The child you claim to be abused never was abused. I watched again the entire video. Even the prosecution merely said she and her husband must be guilty of something. Sure, guilty they loved the child is what the evidence shows.
Floyd by law was to be arrested for passing counterfeit. And Floyd was never strangled.
Floyd was videoed in the cop car telling them he can't breathe. So if that is true, drugs killed him.
Ashli Babbit was not with angry people. There were just 2 beating windows and she was upset at that and slapped the guilty man. She was being the hero in fact. No Congress person was remotely threatened. That is fiction.

Floyd took a dirt nap. But him you support.
 

Forum List

Back
Top