Your complaint is about lawyers and judges using phrases and words that are more inclusive so their decisions cannot be attacked as not applying to all cases? It is a sign of the litigious times we live in that they have to worry about it.
The bigger story was the blocking of Tennessee's fetal heartbeat law as vague. The Federal Judge appointed by Donald Trump had already said as much and the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed. . A look at 6th circuit court of appeals, confirms 80% appointed by Republican conservative Presidents, not exactly a bastion of liberals to be found there.
"In blocking the law, U.S. District Judge William Campbell Jr., a Donald Trump appointee, said the plaintiffs were likely to succeed in challenging the law and that portions of the statute — the ban based on discrimination — were so vague that the law was unconstitutional.
“When a law threatens criminal sanctions, such vague provisions and potential varied interpretations cannot stand,” he wrote.
A 2-1 majority of the Sixth Circuit agreed Friday, after hearing oral arguments in the case in April."
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
Until the Supremes kill Roe vs Wade, it looks like the only way to ban abortions is going to be to open up standing to anybody in the country to sue with guaranteed monetary judgement backed by a state, like Texas did, though there is no telling how long that will stand. I guess we could get rid of most laws in a similar fashion if nobody ever had to worry about having standing to sue over something they did not agree with and a state was willing to guarantee payment. Not sure, that is the way to go, though. Wait until they start suing airlines for selling pregnant women a ticket to get out of the state of Texas.
Abortion is just not my issue, as I am a 67-year-old guy, with zero probability of becoming pregnant, would advise against abortion in most cases, but don't think it is my place or the government's to get involved and order the decision to be made to my liking.