Shrimpbox
Gold Member
Well I make no claims to being more than a layman on the financial front, but I am always interested in information. I receive the Stansberry investment letter and he skewers Elon musk, Tesla, and Solar City. The key points of his attack, and yes it is a financial standpoint, is that solar city and much of tesla is a house of cards. Solar city is not selling their panels outright they are leasing them to homeowners for 20 years.( when they do sell the panels outright they do so at a loss). By doing this solar gets all subsidies from the federal and state govt to support a cash flow which would not be there otherwise. The other lynchpin of solar strategy is that homeowners would help pay for their panels by saving money on their electric bills by selling power back to the utility at RETAIL RATES. Once the electric utilities realized they were buying electricity at exorbitant rates and having to maintain the power grid basically for free for,these customers they reduced the payments for solar panel power. This move caused solar city to close up shop and move out of Nevada altogether, one of the most promising states for sun power. Reducing the payback costs changs the solar panel equation drastically and makes a 30 to 50 thousand dollar investment look like a bad deal. Solar city has been hemorrhaging money with no end in sight, it has become such a Ponzi scheme that just today tesla and solar are fixing to merge. Many investors are blinded by Musks charm and charisma. According to this article even the new lithium batteries are not going to live up to the hype.
What is obvious from this article is that at least rooftop solar on private homes is not viable energy alternative when all is said and done, at,least if Solar City is doing it. The companies debt is in the billions and the finances of the company is being propped up by shady accounting. The company has been increasing revenues but at the same rate they are increasing losses. You cannot separate solar panel success from financial reality. I would love to live in an alternative energy universe, but I also want to live in a transparent universe. Right now home solar power doesn't cut it, and those are just the facts
PS: This is all your fault WW!
What is obvious from this article is that at least rooftop solar on private homes is not viable energy alternative when all is said and done, at,least if Solar City is doing it. The companies debt is in the billions and the finances of the company is being propped up by shady accounting. The company has been increasing revenues but at the same rate they are increasing losses. You cannot separate solar panel success from financial reality. I would love to live in an alternative energy universe, but I also want to live in a transparent universe. Right now home solar power doesn't cut it, and those are just the facts
PS: This is all your fault WW!