Preacher
Gold Member
No shit! Election machines are just computers!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That was a good movie but the premise was not plausible.Ever seen the movie Man Of The Year? It has Robin Williams in it. That's the kind of cheating I am talking about.
No shit! Election machines are just computers!
You go ahead and believe the politicianOf course Odium doesn't CHECK this guy. Who is nuttier than a Snickers bar..
Clint Curtis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In 2006, Curtis ran unsuccessfully against Feeney for the United States congressional seat in Florida's 24th congressional district.[1] He ran again in 2008, losing in the Democratic primary to eventual winner of the seat, Suzanne Kosmas.
In 2007, Curtis enrolled as a student at the Barry University School of Law in Orlando, Florida.
In 2010, Clint Curtis was the Democratic nominee for Congress in California's 4th district, ultimately losing to incumbent Representative Tom McClintock.
Curtis specifically alleged that:
At the behest of Rep. Tom Feeney, in September 2000, he was asked to write a program for a touchscreen voting machine that would make it possible to change the results of an election undetectably.[10] Curtis assumed initially that this effort was aimed at detecting Democratic fraud, but later learned that it was intended to benefit the Republican Party.
Curtis explained that the software could be used in any electronic tabulation machine or scanner. He spoke about this to the Conyers Voting Forum, after Conyers left the forum and turned over the dais on December 13, 2004.[11]
Feeney's response to allegations[edit]
In 2005, Feeney responded to Curtis's allegations in a news article posted in the St. Petersburg Times. According to the newspaper, Feeney stated:
that he had no recollection of ever meeting Curtis or of discussing vote fraud with anyone;
that he could not have discussed a plan to commit fraud in touch screen voting machines in September or October 2000, as alleged by Curtis, because, "touch screen voting machines were not even contemplated until November 2000"; and
that although Curtis accused Feeney of a wide variety of misconduct in his 2004 book, Just A Fly On The Wall, Curtis never mentioned the alleged vote fraud scheme.[2]
Two failed political campaigns AGAINST Feeney and WHOLE book about him that never mentions the "alledged computer fraud"? NO INVESTIGATION of his employer when he made statements that he was DIRECTED by mgt to commit fraud?
Sorry man.. Loser was too much of a loser to take the fall for perjury under oath. Whatever hearing that he was smirking at just felt sorry for him..
Do vet your "heroes" a bit.. It helps decrease the cred loss and saves US time..
\Of course Odium doesn't CHECK this guy. Who is nuttier than a Snickers bar..
Clint Curtis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In 2006, Curtis ran unsuccessfully against Feeney for the United States congressional seat in Florida's 24th congressional district.[1] He ran again in 2008, losing in the Democratic primary to eventual winner of the seat, Suzanne Kosmas.
In 2007, Curtis enrolled as a student at the Barry University School of Law in Orlando, Florida.
In 2010, Clint Curtis was the Democratic nominee for Congress in California's 4th district, ultimately losing to incumbent Representative Tom McClintock.
Curtis specifically alleged that:
At the behest of Rep. Tom Feeney, in September 2000, he was asked to write a program for a touchscreen voting machine that would make it possible to change the results of an election undetectably.[10] Curtis assumed initially that this effort was aimed at detecting Democratic fraud, but later learned that it was intended to benefit the Republican Party.
Curtis explained that the software could be used in any electronic tabulation machine or scanner. He spoke about this to the Conyers Voting Forum, after Conyers left the forum and turned over the dais on December 13, 2004.[11]
Feeney's response to allegations[edit]
In 2005, Feeney responded to Curtis's allegations in a news article posted in the St. Petersburg Times. According to the newspaper, Feeney stated:
that he had no recollection of ever meeting Curtis or of discussing vote fraud with anyone;
that he could not have discussed a plan to commit fraud in touch screen voting machines in September or October 2000, as alleged by Curtis, because, "touch screen voting machines were not even contemplated until November 2000"; and
that although Curtis accused Feeney of a wide variety of misconduct in his 2004 book, Just A Fly On The Wall, Curtis never mentioned the alleged vote fraud scheme.[2]
Two failed political campaigns AGAINST Feeney and WHOLE book about him that never mentions the "alledged computer fraud"? NO INVESTIGATION of his employer when he made statements that he was DIRECTED by mgt to commit fraud?
Sorry man.. Loser was too much of a loser to take the fall for perjury under oath. Whatever hearing that he was smirking at just felt sorry for him..
Do vet your "heroes" a bit.. It helps decrease the cred loss and saves US time..
No shit! Election machines are just computers!
You go ahead and believe the politicianOf course Odium doesn't CHECK this guy. Who is nuttier than a Snickers bar..
Clint Curtis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In 2006, Curtis ran unsuccessfully against Feeney for the United States congressional seat in Florida's 24th congressional district.[1] He ran again in 2008, losing in the Democratic primary to eventual winner of the seat, Suzanne Kosmas.
In 2007, Curtis enrolled as a student at the Barry University School of Law in Orlando, Florida.
In 2010, Clint Curtis was the Democratic nominee for Congress in California's 4th district, ultimately losing to incumbent Representative Tom McClintock.
Curtis specifically alleged that:
At the behest of Rep. Tom Feeney, in September 2000, he was asked to write a program for a touchscreen voting machine that would make it possible to change the results of an election undetectably.[10] Curtis assumed initially that this effort was aimed at detecting Democratic fraud, but later learned that it was intended to benefit the Republican Party.
Curtis explained that the software could be used in any electronic tabulation machine or scanner. He spoke about this to the Conyers Voting Forum, after Conyers left the forum and turned over the dais on December 13, 2004.[11]
Feeney's response to allegations[edit]
In 2005, Feeney responded to Curtis's allegations in a news article posted in the St. Petersburg Times. According to the newspaper, Feeney stated:
that he had no recollection of ever meeting Curtis or of discussing vote fraud with anyone;
that he could not have discussed a plan to commit fraud in touch screen voting machines in September or October 2000, as alleged by Curtis, because, "touch screen voting machines were not even contemplated until November 2000"; and
that although Curtis accused Feeney of a wide variety of misconduct in his 2004 book, Just A Fly On The Wall, Curtis never mentioned the alleged vote fraud scheme.[2]
Two failed political campaigns AGAINST Feeney and WHOLE book about him that never mentions the "alledged computer fraud"? NO INVESTIGATION of his employer when he made statements that he was DIRECTED by mgt to commit fraud?
Sorry man.. Loser was too much of a loser to take the fall for perjury under oath. Whatever hearing that he was smirking at just felt sorry for him..
Do vet your "heroes" a bit.. It helps decrease the cred loss and saves US time..