jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 158,874
- 39,283
- 2,180
there has to be something there to get a candidate to run. It's not a simple thing, and people aren't willing to do it.There are always alternatives to the status quo.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
there has to be something there to get a candidate to run. It's not a simple thing, and people aren't willing to do it.There are always alternatives to the status quo.
This makes no sense. What you are saying to the taxpayer is that the spending and debt will continue on a blank check basis without accountability or visibility. Based on that logic, we will find ourselves in more deficit and debt and your side hitting US up for even more taxes.The spending and the debt continues. Seems the only way to slow the debt down is to actually make people pay for it.
This makes no sense. What you are saying to the taxpayer is that the spending and debt will continue on a blank check basis without accountability or visibility. Based on that logic, we will find ourselves in more deficit and debt and your side hitting US up for even more taxes.
pknopp , and there you go again, why not present the counter point to my post if you think it's fake? fk dude, you must have social issues.there has to be something there to get a candidate to run. It's not a simple thing, and people aren't willing to do it.
it's what you implied dude!! again, you have no desire to discuss in here, you just want to dictate your point with no counter posts to the ones you receive. You have no ability to engage.Not interested in you twisting what i said. But since you are among those who will continue to vote for it, lash out you will.
so what you posted was fake?I did. You simply repeated what I already addressed.
I didn’t twist what you said. No where in your post have you called for fiscal discipline, cuts, and visibility. What you did say is that spending and debt will always be there and that people need to pay for it.Not interested in you twisting what i said. But since you are among those who will continue to vote for it, lash out you will.
I didn’t twist what you said. No where in your post have you called for fiscal discipline, cuts, and visibility.
because that's what he did, he gave that he is satisfied with status quo. Never find another solution.I didn’t twist what you said. No where in your post have you called for fiscal discipline, cuts, and visibility. What you did say is that spending and debt will always be there and that people need to pay for it.
How is what you said different than what we are doing now??
I'd say you should listen to your own words. It's called irony!Maybe you need to read closer then.
Yeah, your hissy fit vote sure has improved our debt outlook.There are always alternatives to the status quo.

Yeah, your hissy fit vote sure has improved our debt outlook.![]()
The old “this has been discussed” dodge.I did. You simply repeated what I already addressed.

doing nothing is always worse than doing something.It hasn't hurt it unlike those of you who continue to vote for it.
My votes have helped it cuz your Cult always pushes for more spending than Republicans, Simp.It hasn't hurt it unlike those of you who continue to vote for it.
doing nothing is always worse than doing something.
My votes have helped it cuz your Cult always pushes for more spending than Republicans, Simp.
What spending has your hissy fit votes stopped?Sure......voting to continue the debt spending is way better.
Name the folks you voted from the past 5 elections.Sure......voting to continue the debt spending is way better.