They’re Cheating: Democrats Are Calling on Blacks in MISSISSIPPI to Vote in ALABAMA Senate Race

[GHook93]

This is appalling. This is what Democrats did in 1991 when they thought David Duke would defeat Edwin Edwards for Governor. They got negroes from Mississippi (even bussed them in) to vote for Edwards. This is right out of that playbook. Roy Moore has them in a sheer panic.

Could They Be This Bold? Democrats Are Reportedly Calling on Blacks in MISSISSIPPI to Vote in ALABAMA Senate Race

Exactly why Democrats fight tooth and nail against voter ID. They won’t be able to commit voter fraud anymore.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

This is appalling. This is what Democrats did in 1991 when they thought David Duke would defeat Edwin Edwards for Governor. They got negroes from Mississippi (even bussed them in) to vote for Edwards. This is right out of that playbook. Roy Moore has them in a sheer panic.

Could They Be This Bold? Democrats Are Reportedly Calling on Blacks in MISSISSIPPI to Vote in ALABAMA Senate Race

Well Steve_McGarrett regardless what is going on and what is the impact,
This is why we need to add a system of Proportional Representation by Party
instead of "winner take all" - so people go through their party reps and don't have to resort to any such tactics or threats thereof.

What I just proposed to a core of Green party members
is expanding the Elector College system by district to
accommodate a mixed panel of party members. So each party
does have reps to redress grievances and ethics violations AT ALL TIMES.
This should be a constant service and public access, NOT depend on getting certain parties elected before having equal representation on govt issues.

We do. They are called elections. Surely you have heard of them.

The Green Party might be represented by what proportion? Someone's fingernail clippings?

 

[RodISHI]

This is appalling. This is what Democrats did in 1991 when they thought David Duke would defeat Edwin Edwards for Governor. They got negroes from Mississippi (even bussed them in) to vote for Edwards. This is right out of that playbook. Roy Moore has them in a sheer panic.

Could They Be This Bold? Democrats Are Reportedly Calling on Blacks in MISSISSIPPI to Vote in ALABAMA Senate Race

Doug Jones didn't do anything when blacks reported discrimination while he ran the Federal district there so the Democrats would be helping the other candidates not their own.

 

[evenflow1969]

....and once again, Democrats refuse to believe there's such a thing as "voter fraud", even when they're the biggest recipient of it.

Does anyone thing the liberal-biased media would even give something like this consideration? Of course not: They're too busy making up fake news and covering for the left. They won't touch a story until after it filters up through the maverick news sources like the Pundit, Breitbart, Townhall, Free Republic, and the Drudge Report, and finally reaches the FOX Network.

When Dems cheat it's never a voter fraud! When their fraud doesn't work, it's "Russians stole the elections!"

Pretty simple we have laws against voter fraud and a system put into place to prevent it. While this nation is not what it used to be, we are not stupid. If you try to commit voter fraud there is a very good chance you wil be cought and only the very, very stupiud would be willing to commit a felonie over something like a vote. Your vote very wel might not make a difference. If you belive this kind of shit you are a very special stupid and I have some land for salew in Florida I would love to tell you about. The person who started this threadis a ******* troll and I can not belive they do not know they are spreading a falsehood. Ver yfew are realy that stupid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Do you proofread your posts, or are you functionally illiterate?

That is one of the worst posts I have ever seen! You should be ashamed.

Go suck a long cock!!!!!!!!!!!!! Like I give a shit what you think. No I am not going to spell check for this shit. I write technical reports for a living and I will spell check when I get paid to do it. until then **** you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

....and once again, Democrats refuse to believe there's such a thing as "voter fraud", even when they're the biggest recipient of it.

Does anyone thing the liberal-biased media would even give something like this consideration? Of course not: They're too busy making up fake news and covering for the left. They won't touch a story until after it filters up through the maverick news sources like the Pundit, Breitbart, Townhall, Free Republic, and the Drudge Report, and finally reaches the FOX Network.

When Dems cheat it's never a voter fraud! When their fraud doesn't work, it's "Russians stole the elections!"

Pretty simple we have laws against voter fraud and a system put into place to prevent it. While this nation is not what it used to be, we are not stupid. If you try to commit voter fraud there is a very good chance you wil be cought and only the very, very stupiud would be willing to commit a felonie over something like a vote. Your vote very wel might not make a difference. If you belive this kind of shit you are a very special stupid and I have some land for salew in Florida I would love to tell you about. The person who started this threadis a ******* troll and I can not belive they do not know they are spreading a falsehood. Ver yfew are realy that stupid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Do you proofread your posts, or are you functionally illiterate?

That is one of the worst posts I have ever seen! You should be ashamed.

Go suck a long cock!!!!!!!!!!!!! Like I give a shit what you think. No I am not going to spell check for this shit. I write technical reports for a living and I will spell check when I get paid to do it. until then **** you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why didn't you say you were worthless and lazy POS? I should have know that anyone with a user name for a baby bottle was retarded.

Goodbye!

 

[Vastator]

This is appalling. This is what Democrats did in 1991 when they thought David Duke would defeat Edwin Edwards for Governor. They got negroes from Mississippi (even bussed them in) to vote for Edwards. This is right out of that playbook. Roy Moore has them in a sheer panic.

Could They Be This Bold? Democrats Are Reportedly Calling on Blacks in MISSISSIPPI to Vote in ALABAMA Senate Race

We require ID to vote here in Alabama. So they'll have to do more than show up, to vote. They'll need a corrupt precinct to collude with them, and/or fake ids. But the ids have to jive with the list of registered voters in that precinct.

 

[JGalt]

....and once again, Democrats refuse to believe there's such a thing as "voter fraud", even when they're the biggest recipient of it.

Does anyone thing the liberal-biased media would even give something like this consideration? Of course not: They're too busy making up fake news and covering for the left. They won't touch a story until after it filters up through the maverick news sources like the Pundit, Breitbart, Townhall, Free Republic, and the Drudge Report, and finally reaches the FOX Network.

When Dems cheat it's never a voter fraud! When their fraud doesn't work, it's "Russians stole the elections!"

Pretty simple we have laws against voter fraud and a system put into place to prevent it. While this nation is not what it used to be, we are not stupid. If you try to commit voter fraud there is a very good chance you wil be cought and only the very, very stupiud would be willing to commit a felonie over something like a vote. Your vote very wel might not make a difference. If you belive this kind of shit you are a very special stupid and I have some land for salew in Florida I would love to tell you about. The person who started this threadis a ******* troll and I can not belive they do not know they are spreading a falsehood. Ver yfew are realy that stupid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Do you proofread your posts, or are you functionally illiterate?

That is one of the worst posts I have ever seen! You should be ashamed.

Yet another victim of the liberal education system becomes a USMB poster. They really need a basic intelligence test to get a membership here.

 

[Esmeralda]

This is appalling. This is what Democrats did in 1991 when they thought David Duke would defeat Edwin Edwards for Governor. They got negroes from Mississippi (even bussed them in) to vote for Edwards. This is right out of that playbook. Roy Moore has them in a sheer panic.

Could They Be This Bold? Democrats Are Reportedly Calling on Blacks in MISSISSIPPI to Vote in ALABAMA Senate Race

Well Steve_McGarrett regardless what is going on and what is the impact,
This is why we need to add a system of Proportional Representation by Party
instead of "winner take all" - so people go through their party reps and don't have to resort to any such tactics or threats thereof.

What I just proposed to a core of Green party members
is expanding the Elector College system by district to
accommodate a mixed panel of party members. So each party
does have reps to redress grievances and ethics violations AT ALL TIMES.
This should be a constant service and public access, NOT depend on getting certain parties elected before having equal representation on govt issues.

 

[JGalt]

Defy laws, as in sanctuary cities allowing criminal illegals to overrun their neighborhoods or ignoring the fact that pot is still federally illegal?

Gee. You guys sure seemed to have a problem when 11 states seceded from the Union, didn't you? How about Cliven Bundy? He was defying laws that he thought were wrong - Shouldn't he be one of your heroes?

Oh, I get it: It's ok for you but not for us, right? BTW: When was the last time you saw an unruly mob of conservatives wearing black masks, breaking windows at a university, damaging property, assaulting people with sticks and bike locks, and preventing someone to speak on campus?

Moore lost 2 judicial positions for not following the law. Is that appalling, to use the OP's words?

Are you referring to the suspension he received for not going against his religious beliefs, concerning the gay marriage thing? There's man's law and then there's God's law. He did the right thing.

He was a member of government...if he cannot do his job in government....he should quit and become a minister. (perfect position for preying on little girls too...a win/win for him)

Government is a gift from God. All of mankind's highest aspirations, liberties, and rights weren't merely thought up by those who didn't have a belief in a supreme creator. Even the Magna Carta existed only because of Christian influence.

Magna Carta - Wikipedia

Errr..not to burst your bubble..but the Magna Carta had a whole lot more to do with taxes and limiting the power of the King--defining the relationship between Barons and Royals--the popular myth that the Magna Carta established Civil Liberty for the common man..is just that..a myth:

"At the end of the 16th century there was an upsurge in interest in Magna Carta. Lawyers and historians at the time believed that there was an ancient English constitution, going back to the days of the Anglo-Saxons, that protected individual English freedoms. They argued that the Norman invasion of 1066 had overthrown these rights, and that Magna Carta had been a popular attempt to restore them, making the charter an essential foundation for the contemporary powers of Parliament and legal principles such as habeas corpus. Although this historical account was badly flawed, jurists such as Sir Edward Coke used Magna Carta extensively in the early 17th century, arguing against the divine right of kings propounded by the Stuart monarchs. Both James I and his son Charles I attempted to suppress the discussion of Magna Carta, until the issue was curtailed by the English Civil War of the 1640s and the execution of Charles. The political myth of Magna Carta and its protection of ancient personal liberties persisted after the Glorious Revolution of 1688 until well into the 19th century. It influenced the early American colonists in the Thirteen Colonies and the formation of the American Constitution in 1787, which became the supreme law of the land in the new republic of the United States.[c] Research by Victorian historians showed that the original 1215 charter had concerned the medieval relationship between the monarch and the barons, rather than the rights of ordinary people, but the charter remained a powerful, iconic document, even after almost all of its content was repealed from the statute books in the 19th and 20th centuries. Magna Carta still forms an important symbol of liberty today, often cited by politicians and campaigners, and is held in great respect by the British and American legal communities..."

Look at the opening lines:

"John, by the grace of God, King of England, Lord of Ireland, Duke of Normandy and Aquitaine, and Count of Anjou, to his archbishops, bishops, abbots, earls, barons, justices, foresters, sheriffs, stewards, servants, and to all his officials and loyal subjects, greeting.

Know that before God, for the health of our soul and those of our ancestors and heirs, to the honour of God, the exaltation of the holy Church, and the better ordering of our kingdom, at the advice of our reverend fathers Stephen, archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England, and cardinal of the holy Roman Church, Henry archbishop of Dublin, William bishop of London, Peter bishop of Winchester, Jocelin bishop of Bath and Glastonbury, Hugh bishop of Lincoln, Walter Bishop of Worcester, William bishop of Coventry, Benedict bishop of Rochester, Master Pandulf subdeacon and member of the papal household..."

You see no evidence of Christianity there? How about another clause from the Magna Carta?

"First, that we have granted to God, and by this present charter have confirmed for us and our heirs in perpetuity, that the English Church shall be free, and shall have its rights undiminished, and its liberties unimpaired.."

Read more about it if you want to learn something:

The Forgotten Clauses of the Magna Carta - The American Vision

 

[mudwhistle]

....and once again, Democrats refuse to believe there's such a thing as "voter fraud", even when they're the biggest recipient of it.

Does anyone thing the liberal-biased media would even give something like this consideration? Of course not: They're too busy making up fake news and covering for the left. They won't touch a story until after it filters up through the maverick news sources like the Pundit, Breitbart, Townhall, Free Republic, and the Drudge Report, and finally reaches the FOX Network.

When Dems cheat it's never a voter fraud! When their fraud doesn't work, it's "Russians stole the elections!"

Pretty simple we have laws against voter fraud and a system put into place to prevent it. While this nation is not what it used to be, we are not stupid. If you try to commit voter fraud there is a very good chance you wil be cought and only the very, very stupiud would be willing to commit a felonie over something like a vote. Your vote very wel might not make a difference. If you belive this kind of shit you are a very special stupid and I have some land for salew in Florida I would love to tell you about. The person who started this threadis a ******* troll and I can not belive they do not know they are spreading a falsehood. Ver yfew are realy that stupid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If what you're saying is correct, why are Democrats so adamantly opposed to a national voter ID law?

Because they think blacks are too dumb to get an I. D.

 

[easyt65]

Since it was proven that Hillary Clinton 'Bought' the DNC and turned it into part of personal crime syndicate during the last election, it really should be 'banned' / dismantled until it opens up ALL of its records, files, finances, etc to prove that has been corrected / reversed / ended.

 

[emilynghiem]

This is appalling. This is what Democrats did in 1991 when they thought David Duke would defeat Edwin Edwards for Governor. They got negroes from Mississippi (even bussed them in) to vote for Edwards. This is right out of that playbook. Roy Moore has them in a sheer panic.

Could They Be This Bold? Democrats Are Reportedly Calling on Blacks in MISSISSIPPI to Vote in ALABAMA Senate Race

Well Steve_McGarrett regardless what is going on and what is the impact,
This is why we need to add a system of Proportional Representation by Party
instead of "winner take all" - so people go through their party reps and don't have to resort to any such tactics or threats thereof.

What I just proposed to a core of Green party members
is expanding the Elector College system by district to
accommodate a mixed panel of party members. So each party
does have reps to redress grievances and ethics violations AT ALL TIMES.
This should be a constant service and public access, NOT depend on getting certain parties elected before having equal representation on govt issues.

^ What does THAT mean Esmeralda:
Talk to the HAND???

!!!!

What is wrong with Representation by Party!
That would solve the problems with bullying in the media,
abusing party politics to hijack elections and democratic process in govt!

What do you NOT get here?

Do you want to bet 10 million dollars
that we need panels representing the party affiliations
per population of districts and states?

And that party members and leaders will GO for this idea
because they are SICK of being silenced by bullying politics??

If you are so sure this is "crazy talk"
let's make a bet Esmeralda

I will even petition Trump and the First Lady
to take on this idea of representation by party
so that facilitators can mediate and come out
with alternative solutions to CONFLICTS between parties and BELIEFS.

[If I am right and party leaders GO for this idea, then YOU have to raise
10 million to launch it, where I have already proposed to go through public radio
and internet to organize people by party. If I am wrong and this idea is empty and invalid
then I will raise and pay 10 million to a better solution that donors vote for,
so we raise money online for either your idea or mine, whichever people SUPPORT.]

what a concept. Is it over your head Esmeralda?
Can you come up with a better one?

Please explain your reaction and how this
applies to the content of my post, if you even read or understood it?

Thanks! Would be GLAD to hear your
explanation and objections, please spell them out.

And if you have better ideas, GREAT!
Let's post yours and mine online, let people vote with their dollars,
whoever raises more money wins the bet!

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

....and once again, Democrats refuse to believe there's such a thing as "voter fraud", even when they're the biggest recipient of it.

Does anyone thing the liberal-biased media would even give something like this consideration? Of course not: They're too busy making up fake news and covering for the left. They won't touch a story until after it filters up through the maverick news sources like the Pundit, Breitbart, Townhall, Free Republic, and the Drudge Report, and finally reaches the FOX Network.

When Dems cheat it's never a voter fraud! When their fraud doesn't work, it's "Russians stole the elections!"

Pretty simple we have laws against voter fraud and a system put into place to prevent it. While this nation is not what it used to be, we are not stupid. If you try to commit voter fraud there is a very good chance you wil be cought and only the very, very stupiud would be willing to commit a felonie over something like a vote. Your vote very wel might not make a difference. If you belive this kind of shit you are a very special stupid and I have some land for salew in Florida I would love to tell you about. The person who started this threadis a ******* troll and I can not belive they do not know they are spreading a falsehood. Ver yfew are realy that stupid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Do you proofread your posts, or are you functionally illiterate?

That is one of the worst posts I have ever seen! You should be ashamed.

Go suck a long cock!!!!!!!!!!!!! Like I give a shit what you think. No I am not going to spell check for this shit. I write technical reports for a living and I will spell check when I get paid to do it. until then **** you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lol........can we say....

 

[Stratford57]

....and once again, Democrats refuse to believe there's such a thing as "voter fraud", even when they're the biggest recipient of it.

Does anyone thing the liberal-biased media would even give something like this consideration? Of course not: They're too busy making up fake news and covering for the left. They won't touch a story until after it filters up through the maverick news sources like the Pundit, Breitbart, Townhall, Free Republic, and the Drudge Report, and finally reaches the FOX Network.

When Dems cheat it's never a voter fraud! When their fraud doesn't work, it's "Russians stole the elections!"

Pretty simple we have laws against voter fraud and a system put into place to prevent it. While this nation is not what it used to be, we are not stupid. If you try to commit voter fraud there is a very good chance you wil be cought and only the very, very stupiud would be willing to commit a felonie over something like a vote. Your vote very wel might not make a difference. If you belive this kind of shit you are a very special stupid and I have some land for salew in Florida I would love to tell you about. The person who started this threadis a ******* troll and I can not belive they do not know they are spreading a falsehood. Ver yfew are realy that stupid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If what you're saying is correct, why are Democrats so adamantly opposed to a national voter ID law?

Because they think blacks are too dumb to get an I. D.

It's just an excuse for dummies. In reality without a voter ID Dems can help themselves to win using carousels, making illegals and dead people vote for "correct candidates". With required voter's ID Dems may never win again.

 

[easyt65]

[

What is wrong with Representation by Party!

We have that NOW.
It solves nothing and only perpetuates the corruption, crime, covering up of corruption/crime, fake news, propaganda, division, violence...etc

Elected officials are supposed to be Servants of the PEOPLE', not the PARTY. T

hat's the majority of the problem we have right now. Chuck Schumer publicly declared Democrats are 100% committed to obstruction - FOR THE GOOD OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY - against anything and everything the GOP / President tries to accomplish for the good of the NATION.

That answers your question / statement.

'Nuff said.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Moore lost 2 judicial positions for not following the law. Is that appalling, to use the OP's words?

Are you referring to the suspension he received for not going against his religious beliefs, concerning the gay marriage thing? There's man's law and then there's God's law. He did the right thing.

He was a member of government...if he cannot do his job in government....he should quit and become a minister. (perfect position for preying on little girls too...a win/win for him)

Government is a gift from God. All of mankind's highest aspirations, liberties, and rights weren't merely thought up by those who didn't have a belief in a supreme creator. Even the Magna Carta existed only because of Christian influence.

Magna Carta - Wikipedia

Errr..not to burst your bubble..but the Magna Carta had a whole lot more to do with taxes and limiting the power of the King--defining the relationship between Barons and Royals--the popular myth that the Magna Carta established Civil Liberty for the common man..is just that..a myth:

"At the end of the 16th century there was an upsurge in interest in Magna Carta. Lawyers and historians at the time believed that there was an ancient English constitution, going back to the days of the Anglo-Saxons, that protected individual English freedoms. They argued that the Norman invasion of 1066 had overthrown these rights, and that Magna Carta had been a popular attempt to restore them, making the charter an essential foundation for the contemporary powers of Parliament and legal principles such as habeas corpus. Although this historical account was badly flawed, jurists such as Sir Edward Coke used Magna Carta extensively in the early 17th century, arguing against the divine right of kings propounded by the Stuart monarchs. Both James I and his son Charles I attempted to suppress the discussion of Magna Carta, until the issue was curtailed by the English Civil War of the 1640s and the execution of Charles. The political myth of Magna Carta and its protection of ancient personal liberties persisted after the Glorious Revolution of 1688 until well into the 19th century. It influenced the early American colonists in the Thirteen Colonies and the formation of the American Constitution in 1787, which became the supreme law of the land in the new republic of the United States.[c] Research by Victorian historians showed that the original 1215 charter had concerned the medieval relationship between the monarch and the barons, rather than the rights of ordinary people, but the charter remained a powerful, iconic document, even after almost all of its content was repealed from the statute books in the 19th and 20th centuries. Magna Carta still forms an important symbol of liberty today, often cited by politicians and campaigners, and is held in great respect by the British and American legal communities..."

Look at the opening lines:

"John, by the grace of God, King of England, Lord of Ireland, Duke of Normandy and Aquitaine, and Count of Anjou, to his archbishops, bishops, abbots, earls, barons, justices, foresters, sheriffs, stewards, servants, and to all his officials and loyal subjects, greeting.

Know that before God, for the health of our soul and those of our ancestors and heirs, to the honour of God, the exaltation of the holy Church, and the better ordering of our kingdom, at the advice of our reverend fathers Stephen, archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England, and cardinal of the holy Roman Church, Henry archbishop of Dublin, William bishop of London, Peter bishop of Winchester, Jocelin bishop of Bath and Glastonbury, Hugh bishop of Lincoln, Walter Bishop of Worcester, William bishop of Coventry, Benedict bishop of Rochester, Master Pandulf subdeacon and member of the papal household..."

You see no evidence of Christianity there? How about another clause from the Magna Carta?

"First, that we have granted to God, and by this present charter have confirmed for us and our heirs in perpetuity, that the English Church shall be free, and shall have its rights undiminished, and its liberties unimpaired.."

Read more about it if you want to learn something:

The Forgotten Clauses of the Magna Carta - The American Vision

***yawn** have read it...all of it--and the Pro Forma invocations to God..have nothing at all with the intent of the document. The Church of the time..was interested in safeguarding its properties and holdings from the grasping of King John...who had bankrupted the country with a series of ruinous wars.
Not much noble about that.

If you wish to yak about history..perhaps you have some input on the fact that Pope Innocent III renounced the Magna Carta--so I guess that's the Christian take?

I get your point...and I reject it. Separation of Church and State..is one of the greatest things we have done as a country..and Judge Moore..is a prime example of why..we rule by law here..not by some religious fanatic's 'higher vision'. His actions were the same as an imman's rulings under Sharia law.

Oh..and your link..I completely disagree....I believe it to be unsupported Christian propaganda..devoid of historical accuracy. As i said..the invocation of God was Pro Forma..and the goal of the Church..was to secure their secular holdings.

 

[JGalt]

....and once again, Democrats refuse to believe there's such a thing as "voter fraud", even when they're the biggest recipient of it.

Does anyone thing the liberal-biased media would even give something like this consideration? Of course not: They're too busy making up fake news and covering for the left. They won't touch a story until after it filters up through the maverick news sources like the Pundit, Breitbart, Townhall, Free Republic, and the Drudge Report, and finally reaches the FOX Network.

When Dems cheat it's never a voter fraud! When their fraud doesn't work, it's "Russians stole the elections!"

Pretty simple we have laws against voter fraud and a system put into place to prevent it. While this nation is not what it used to be, we are not stupid. If you try to commit voter fraud there is a very good chance you wil be cought and only the very, very stupiud would be willing to commit a felonie over something like a vote. Your vote very wel might not make a difference. If you belive this kind of shit you are a very special stupid and I have some land for salew in Florida I would love to tell you about. The person who started this threadis a ******* troll and I can not belive they do not know they are spreading a falsehood. Ver yfew are realy that stupid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If what you're saying is correct, why are Democrats so adamantly opposed to a national voter ID law?

Because they think blacks are too dumb to get an I. D.

Ahh I see. perpetuating the stereotype that blacks are worthless, lazy, stupid and oppressed.

So that's the only way Democrats win elections. I'll buy that.

 

[jasonnfree]

Below is a link to someone who has written about voter caging. How republicans use dirty tricks to eliminate Blacks and other minorities from voting.

Judge Roy Moore’s Campaign Chief Brett Doster Directed Illegal Voter Caging

 

[HappyJoy]

Women nerd to be smacked around every now and then in order to put them in their place, especially when they engage in criminal acts such as stealing another man's property. The man must always be at the top of the hierarchy.

I just read THIS? ^ ^ ^

Should I laugh, cry or snicker uncontrollably?

Perhaps pity the guy who thinks "women need to be smacked around" because he doesn't have enough confidence in his own ability.

He's got to have the most awesome people skills.....

Where did he go? I bet his wife (or husband) only let's him on the internet a few hours a day.

 

[mudwhistle]

....and once again, Democrats refuse to believe there's such a thing as "voter fraud", even when they're the biggest recipient of it.

Does anyone thing the liberal-biased media would even give something like this consideration? Of course not: They're too busy making up fake news and covering for the left. They won't touch a story until after it filters up through the maverick news sources like the Pundit, Breitbart, Townhall, Free Republic, and the Drudge Report, and finally reaches the FOX Network.

When Dems cheat it's never a voter fraud! When their fraud doesn't work, it's "Russians stole the elections!"

Pretty simple we have laws against voter fraud and a system put into place to prevent it. While this nation is not what it used to be, we are not stupid. If you try to commit voter fraud there is a very good chance you wil be cought and only the very, very stupiud would be willing to commit a felonie over something like a vote. Your vote very wel might not make a difference. If you belive this kind of shit you are a very special stupid and I have some land for salew in Florida I would love to tell you about. The person who started this threadis a ******* troll and I can not belive they do not know they are spreading a falsehood. Ver yfew are realy that stupid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If what you're saying is correct, why are Democrats so adamantly opposed to a national voter ID law?

Because they think blacks are too dumb to get an I. D.

It's just an excuse for dummies. In reality without a voter ID Dems can help themselves to win using carousels, making illegals and dead people vote for "correct candidates". With required voter's ID Dems may never win again.

Voting by absentee is their solution to that.
All they have to do is establish residency in a bunch of states that only vote through the mail, Blue States coincidentally, and they can still win.