"...they will be prosecuted" Finally! The Obama Coup against America comes undone

[colfax_m]

“And if people broke the law, and we can establish that with the evidence, they will be prosecuted.”

This is about as meaningless of a statement he could possibly make.

Did you see the word “if” there?

Nothing "meaningless" about it, no matter how desperately you try to spin it. EVERY criminal investigation operates on that very framework.

It’s quite meaningless.

He said if they find evidence of criminal acts sufficient to press charges, then he’s going to press charges.

Well not shit. That’s exactly what the AG does. He could say that about literally anything. It’s meaningless.

It’s just that the faithful around here are taking this as a promise that there will be prosecutions.

 

[Cecilie1200]

It will be very interesting to see how history treats the actions of this administration...(Nixon is watching from his grave)

Yeah, wondering why spying on political opponents was only wrong when he did it, not when the Democrats do.

 

[Cecilie1200]

“And if people broke the law, and we can establish that with the evidence, they will be prosecuted.”

This is about as meaningless of a statement he could possibly make.

Did you see the word “if” there?

Nothing "meaningless" about it, no matter how desperately you try to spin it. EVERY criminal investigation operates on that very framework.

It’s quite meaningless.

He said if they find evidence of criminal acts sufficient to press charges, then he’s going to press charges.

Well not shit. That’s exactly what the AG does. He could say that about literally anything. It’s meaningless.

It’s just that the faithful around here are taking this as a promise that there will be prosecutions.

Maybe because "the faithful" know that there are criminal acts to be found, no matter how much you try to whistle past the graveyard.

 

[colfax_m]

“And if people broke the law, and we can establish that with the evidence, they will be prosecuted.”

This is about as meaningless of a statement he could possibly make.

Did you see the word “if” there?

Nothing "meaningless" about it, no matter how desperately you try to spin it. EVERY criminal investigation operates on that very framework.

It’s quite meaningless.

He said if they find evidence of criminal acts sufficient to press charges, then he’s going to press charges.

Well not shit. That’s exactly what the AG does. He could say that about literally anything. It’s meaningless.

It’s just that the faithful around here are taking this as a promise that there will be prosecutions.

Maybe because "the faithful" know that there are criminal acts to be found, no matter how much you try to whistle past the graveyard.

The problem is the faithful decided there were criminal acts and then demanded an investigation to find them. Put the cart before the horse. That’s not justice.

 

[PoliticalChic]

AG Barr just signaled that things are about to get ugly for the Russia collusion team

After 3 1/2 years, the painfully obvious is finally exposed!

“I think what happened to him,” he said, referring to the president and the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into his campaign, “was one of the greatest travesties in American history.”

The AG then ominously stated that he is not interested in simply receiving a “report” from Durham. He expects him to focus on possible criminal violations: “And if people broke the law, and we can establish that with the evidence, they will be prosecuted.”

Finally!

Well let's hope we finally see some perp walks and some heads roll because until we do this country is finished because no one will have any faith in it.

This is where I need an "Amen!" button!

 

[colfax_m]

It will be very interesting to see how history treats the actions of this administration...(Nixon is watching from his grave)

Yeah, wondering why spying on political opponents was only wrong when he did it, not when the Democrats do.

Warrants, really.

And before you say it, yes, one of the warrants had serious problems and I’m on record saying that the people responsible for lying or obfuscating on the warrant should face charges if theres sufficient evidence, although I don’t think it’s a slam dunk by any means.

 

[Cecilie1200]

“And if people broke the law, and we can establish that with the evidence, they will be prosecuted.”

This is about as meaningless of a statement he could possibly make.

Did you see the word “if” there?

Nothing "meaningless" about it, no matter how desperately you try to spin it. EVERY criminal investigation operates on that very framework.

It’s quite meaningless.

He said if they find evidence of criminal acts sufficient to press charges, then he’s going to press charges.

Well not shit. That’s exactly what the AG does. He could say that about literally anything. It’s meaningless.

It’s just that the faithful around here are taking this as a promise that there will be prosecutions.

Maybe because "the faithful" know that there are criminal acts to be found, no matter how much you try to whistle past the graveyard.

The problem is the faithful decided there were criminal acts and then demanded an investigation to find them. Put the cart before the horse. That’s not justice.

We're not talking about the leftist faithful and their desperation to impeach Trump, hon.

 

[Dragonlady]

AG Barr just signaled that things are about to get ugly for the Russia collusion team

After 3 1/2 years, the painfully obvious is finally exposed!

“I think what happened to him,” he said, referring to the president and the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into his campaign, “was one of the greatest travesties in American history.”

The AG then ominously stated that he is not interested in simply receiving a “report” from Durham. He expects him to focus on possible criminal violations: “And if people broke the law, and we can establish that with the evidence, they will be prosecuted.”

Finally!

Any day now. For a year and a half, Barr tried to get a Grand Jury to indict McCabe, and finally gave up. I'll get exicted when the charges are filed.

Why don't you just hold your breath until that happens? I'm going to do the supper dishes.

 

[Dragonlady]

Hear those sounds? The first sound you hear is the sound of crickets chirping. The second sound you hear are giant thuds of the careers of any DOJ employee that assists Barr in his Abuse of Power.

Spying on a Presidential candidate was the biggest abuse of power in my lifetime. Were the roles reversed and Bush (properly) spied on born in Kenya Obama, there would be hundreds of dead Republicans already killed for sedition and treason.

**** you

**** you Squared!

TRUMP WAS NOT SPIED UPON. HE MADE THAT UP TO COVER UP HIS INVOLVEMENT IN WIKILEAKS AND RUSSIA. WHY DO YOU BELIEVE TRUMP AND NOT THE EVIDENCE?

 

[Dragonlady]

“And if people broke the law, and we can establish that with the evidence, they will be prosecuted.”

This is about as meaningless of a statement he could possibly make.

Did you see the word “if” there?

Nothing "meaningless" about it, no matter how desperately you try to spin it. EVERY criminal investigation operates on that very framework.

It’s quite meaningless.

He said if they find evidence of criminal acts sufficient to press charges, then he’s going to press charges.

Well not shit. That’s exactly what the AG does. He could say that about literally anything. It’s meaningless.

It’s just that the faithful around here are taking this as a promise that there will be prosecutions.

Maybe because "the faithful" know that there are criminal acts to be found, no matter how much you try to whistle past the graveyard.

The problem is the faithful decided there were criminal acts and then demanded an investigation to find them. Put the cart before the horse. That’s not justice.

We're not talking about the leftist faithful and their desperation to impeach Trump, hon.

You mean like investigating the Clintons 25 times without filing a single charge and still calling her a criminal? That kind of desperation.

And here you folks are again, hoping and praying to take down Democrats with Republicans lies and nothing else.

 

[colfax_m]

“And if people broke the law, and we can establish that with the evidence, they will be prosecuted.”

This is about as meaningless of a statement he could possibly make.

Did you see the word “if” there?

Nothing "meaningless" about it, no matter how desperately you try to spin it. EVERY criminal investigation operates on that very framework.

It’s quite meaningless.

He said if they find evidence of criminal acts sufficient to press charges, then he’s going to press charges.

Well not shit. That’s exactly what the AG does. He could say that about literally anything. It’s meaningless.

It’s just that the faithful around here are taking this as a promise that there will be prosecutions.

Maybe because "the faithful" know that there are criminal acts to be found, no matter how much you try to whistle past the graveyard.

The problem is the faithful decided there were criminal acts and then demanded an investigation to find them. Put the cart before the horse. That’s not justice.

We're not talking about the leftist faithful and their desperation to impeach Trump, hon.

Oh no. Not at all. This is at least an order of magnitude greater.

The list of people the Trump faithful wasn’t prosecuted is very long. Posters here in this threat have stated that unless they get what they want, they consider the country “lost”.

 

[lennypartiv]

Finally! What, for the hundredth time?

These cases are a challenge since the Deep State protects it's own.

 

[Cecilie1200]

“And if people broke the law, and we can establish that with the evidence, they will be prosecuted.”

This is about as meaningless of a statement he could possibly make.

Did you see the word “if” there?

Nothing "meaningless" about it, no matter how desperately you try to spin it. EVERY criminal investigation operates on that very framework.

It’s quite meaningless.

He said if they find evidence of criminal acts sufficient to press charges, then he’s going to press charges.

Well not shit. That’s exactly what the AG does. He could say that about literally anything. It’s meaningless.

It’s just that the faithful around here are taking this as a promise that there will be prosecutions.

Maybe because "the faithful" know that there are criminal acts to be found, no matter how much you try to whistle past the graveyard.

The problem is the faithful decided there were criminal acts and then demanded an investigation to find them. Put the cart before the horse. That’s not justice.

We're not talking about the leftist faithful and their desperation to impeach Trump, hon.

You mean like investigating the Clintons 25 times without filing a single charge and still calling her a criminal? That kind of desperation.

And here you folks are again, hoping and praying to take down Democrats with Republicans lies and nothing else.

Oh, puhleeze. I'm so sick and tired of the leftists chanting, "We prevented you from doing anything about it, therefore there was nothing there at all!" I realize that YOU probably really are stupid enough to think that because Comey refused to file charges against Hillary, that somehow means she actually didn't do anything, despite the fact that he had just gotten done listing all of the things she had done wrong. But please stop trying to infect me with your brainless ignorance.

Also, "lies" is not defined as "things I just don't want to believe", so either wrap your tiny mind around the facts of the situation, or stop presuming to comment on it, you uninformed left-wing zombie.

 

[colfax_m]

“And if people broke the law, and we can establish that with the evidence, they will be prosecuted.”

This is about as meaningless of a statement he could possibly make.

Did you see the word “if” there?

Nothing "meaningless" about it, no matter how desperately you try to spin it. EVERY criminal investigation operates on that very framework.

It’s quite meaningless.

He said if they find evidence of criminal acts sufficient to press charges, then he’s going to press charges.

Well not shit. That’s exactly what the AG does. He could say that about literally anything. It’s meaningless.

It’s just that the faithful around here are taking this as a promise that there will be prosecutions.

Maybe because "the faithful" know that there are criminal acts to be found, no matter how much you try to whistle past the graveyard.

The problem is the faithful decided there were criminal acts and then demanded an investigation to find them. Put the cart before the horse. That’s not justice.

We're not talking about the leftist faithful and their desperation to impeach Trump, hon.

You mean like investigating the Clintons 25 times without filing a single charge and still calling her a criminal? That kind of desperation.

And here you folks are again, hoping and praying to take down Democrats with Republicans lies and nothing else.

Oh, puhleeze. I'm so sick and tired of the leftists chanting, "We prevented you from doing anything about it, therefore there was nothing there at all!" I realize that YOU probably really are stupid enough to think that because Comey refused to file charges against Hillary, that somehow means she actually didn't do anything, despite the fact that he had just gotten done listing all of the things she had done wrong. But please stop trying to infect me with your brainless ignorance.

Also, "lies" is not defined as "things I just don't want to believe", so either wrap your tiny mind around the facts of the situation, or stop presuming to comment on it, you uninformed left-wing zombie.

Comey wasn’t the only one who decided not to charge Clinton. It was the unanimous decision of everyone involved including career prosecutors at the DoJ.

You know who else also decided not to file charges against her? Everyone in Trump’s DoJ, including Jeff Sessions and Bill Barr. Don’t tell me they’re corrupt leftists too?

This may sound crazy, but one way to explain all this is that maybe there just wasn’t sufficient grounds for prosecution.

 

[HappyJoy]

Finally! What, for the hundredth time?

These cases are a challenge since the Deep State protects it's own.

Over 3 years in and they can't find someone to pull the trigger?

 

[Dragonlady]

“And if people broke the law, and we can establish that with the evidence, they will be prosecuted.”

This is about as meaningless of a statement he could possibly make.

Did you see the word “if” there?

Nothing "meaningless" about it, no matter how desperately you try to spin it. EVERY criminal investigation operates on that very framework.

It’s quite meaningless.

He said if they find evidence of criminal acts sufficient to press charges, then he’s going to press charges.

Well not shit. That’s exactly what the AG does. He could say that about literally anything. It’s meaningless.

It’s just that the faithful around here are taking this as a promise that there will be prosecutions.

Maybe because "the faithful" know that there are criminal acts to be found, no matter how much you try to whistle past the graveyard.

The problem is the faithful decided there were criminal acts and then demanded an investigation to find them. Put the cart before the horse. That’s not justice.

We're not talking about the leftist faithful and their desperation to impeach Trump, hon.

You mean like investigating the Clintons 25 times without filing a single charge and still calling her a criminal? That kind of desperation.

And here you folks are again, hoping and praying to take down Democrats with Republicans lies and nothing else.

Oh, puhleeze. I'm so sick and tired of the leftists chanting, "We prevented you from doing anything about it, therefore there was nothing there at all!" I realize that YOU probably really are stupid enough to think that because Comey refused to file charges against Hillary, that somehow means she actually didn't do anything, despite the fact that he had just gotten done listing all of the things she had done wrong. But please stop trying to infect me with your brainless ignorance.

Also, "lies" is not defined as "things I just don't want to believe", so either wrap your tiny mind around the facts of the situation, or stop presuming to comment on it, you uninformed left-wing zombie.

In what way did Democrats prevent Republicans from "doing" anything to Hillary? Republicans wrote each and every one of the reports exonerating her. Even Trey Gowdy of the 15 minute sound bite trying to weasel word questions to force Jim Comey to call Hillary Clinton a "liar", authored a report that said that Hillary Clinton was honest and forthright in her answers to his Committee, and found no evidence of wrong doing on her part in Benghazi.

Recently, Hillary was being interviewed as Trump was trying to incite yet another round of investigations, and the interviewer asked about her feelings about the investigation. Hillary shrugged and said "Let em investigate.

Think carefully. If you were Bill and Hillary Clinton, and you were investigated at least once a year for more than twenty five years, would you do ANYTHING illegal? This is a serious question. The Clintons publish all of their personal and Foundation's tax returns. Staffers have written books, including members of their SS detail. Every aspect of their finances, the Foundation and their work has been scruntined, reported to oversight committees, and investigated by jouralists.

How do they manage to commit all of these financial crimes without leave a single piece of evidence behind? There are no books or financial records found. Their names haven't turned up in any of the real international financial scandals which have occured with Trump and his financial associates, since Whitewater. And even in Whitewater, there was no evidence the Clintons were involved.

More telling is that no one has turned state's evidence against the Clintons. Ken Starr offered everyone and his mother immunity from prosecution if they would just give him something, anything on the Clintons. Susan McDougal sat in jail for a year because she refused to give Ken Starr what he wanted. She said she would have if she could have, without committing perjury.

 

[Seawytch]

It will be very interesting to see how history treats the actions of this administration...(Nixon is watching from his grave)

Yeah, wondering why spying on political opponents was only wrong when he did it, not when the Democrats do.

Because as far as we know, Nixon is the only President to have done it.

 

[Crepitus]

AG Barr just signaled that things are about to get ugly for the Russia collusion team

After 3 1/2 years, the painfully obvious is finally exposed!

“I think what happened to him,” he said, referring to the president and the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into his campaign, “was one of the greatest travesties in American history.”

The AG then ominously stated that he is not interested in simply receiving a “report” from Durham. He expects him to focus on possible criminal violations: “And if people broke the law, and we can establish that with the evidence, they will be prosecuted.”

Finally!

An opinion piece. Nothing more.

He's got nothing or we'd be hearing about it daily. The tRump *administration* leaks like a sieve.

 

[dudmuck]

“And if people broke the law, and we can establish that with the evidence, they will be prosecuted.”

This is about as meaningless of a statement he could possibly make.

Did you see the word “if” there?

Nothing "meaningless" about it, no matter how desperately you try to spin it. EVERY criminal investigation operates on that very framework.

It’s quite meaningless.

He said if they find evidence of criminal acts sufficient to press charges, then he’s going to press charges.

Well not shit. That’s exactly what the AG does. He could say that about literally anything. It’s meaningless.

It’s just that the faithful around here are taking this as a promise that there will be prosecutions.

Maybe because "the faithful" know that there are criminal acts to be found, no matter how much you try to whistle past the graveyard.

The problem is the faithful decided there were criminal acts and then demanded an investigation to find them. Put the cart before the horse. That’s not justice.

We're not talking about the leftist faithful and their desperation to impeach Trump, hon.

You mean like investigating the Clintons 25 times without filing a single charge and still calling her a criminal? That kind of desperation.

And here you folks are again, hoping and praying to take down Democrats with Republicans lies and nothing else.

Oh, puhleeze. I'm so sick and tired of the leftists chanting, "We prevented you from doing anything about it, therefore there was nothing there at all!" I realize that YOU probably really are stupid enough to think that because Comey refused to file charges against Hillary, that somehow means she actually didn't do anything, despite the fact that he had just gotten done listing all of the things she had done wrong. But please stop trying to infect me with your brainless ignorance.

Also, "lies" is not defined as "things I just don't want to believe", so either wrap your tiny mind around the facts of the situation, or stop presuming to comment on it, you uninformed left-wing zombie.

 

[Fed Starving]

No matter how harshly you prosecute them now you can't give me the prime years of my life back.