They Did It AGAIN - 6 Jan Committee Caught Altering Evidence Then Lied About It

For a bunch of people who would rather poke their eyes out than watch one second of the hearings you're pretty certain about what is going on.

Hey Dummy, it took me only 2 minutes watching the first J6 "hearing" to realize that they were cherry picking their evidence, then rewriting the history of events to suit a desired outcome, much as all you tards routinely do here. You did that for four years while Trump was in office.

It doesn't take a genius to realize that people only do that when the facts do not meet an agenda they are trying to promote.
 
Dummy, he talks about a quid pro quo arrangement and saying any such arrangement is fine because it involves foreign policy.

That is blatantly wrong. Corruption is corruption and it doesn't matter if it is part of foreign or domestic policy by the president.

When Trump held up millitary aid to Ukraine to push Ukranian administration for a public investigation of his political opposition he clearly put his own interests before American foreign policy interests. He clearly commited a corrupt act and was deservingly impeached for it.
quid pro quo isn't corruption pre se. Most relationships are quid pro quo. Do you even know what quid pro quo means?

hahaha and trump didn't do any of that....that was all Adam Shifty parody you are repeating
 
quid pro quo isn't corruption pre se. Most relationships are quid pro quo. Do you even know what quid pro quo means?

hahaha and trump didn't do any of that....that was all Adam Shifty parody you are repeating
You completely miss the point.

There are appropriate something-for-something arrangements and there are in-apropriate arrangements.

That difference however is not defined by domestic vs foreign policy distictions.

When the other poster claimed that quid pro quo can't be inapropriate when it comes to acts of foreign policy he was blatantly wrong - yes it is very possible to conduct corrupt foreign policy and yes, thats exactly what Trump engaged in.
 
You completely miss the point.

There are appropriate something-for-something arrangements and there are in-apropriate arrangements.

That difference however is not defined by domestic vs foreign policy difference.

When the other poster claimed that quid pro quo can't be inapropriate when it comes to acts of foreign policy he was blatantly wrong - yes it is very possible to conduct corrupt foreign policy and yes, thats exactly what Trump engaged in.
and the poster didn't say anything about an inappropriate arrangement.

nothing trump did with ukraine was inappropriate...unless you are a Putin puppet that didn't want him sending them weapons, or unless you were part of a corrupt business over there like the Xiden family.
 
and the poster didn't say anything about an inappropriate arrangement.

nothing trump did with ukraine was inappropriate...unless you are a Putin puppet that didn't want him sending them weapons, or unless you were part of a corrupt business over there like the Xiden family.
....If it wasn't inapropriate then what the hell is the point of trying to excuse it by claiming it to be part of foreign policy?

Are you seriously this dumb or do you think everyone else is?
 
Last edited:
....If it wasn't inaproprite then what the hell is the point of trying to excuse it by claiming it to be part of foreign policy?

Are you seriously this dumb or do you think everyone else is?
It was part of foreign policy....Ukraine is a foreign country....nobody is excusing it, it was a legit thing to do.

I think most dembots are dumb, cause they fall for Shifty's admitted parody and even repeat it, knowing it was parody
 
Dummy, he talks about a quid pro quo arrangement and saying any such arrangement is fine because it involves foreign policy.

That is blatantly wrong. Corruption is corruption and it doesn't matter if it is part of foreign or domestic policy by the president.

When Trump held up millitary aid to Ukraine to push Ukranian administration for a public investigation of his political opposition he clearly put his own interests before American foreign policy interests. He clearly commited a corrupt act and was deservingly impeached for it.


Xiden certainly did. He bragged about it.

Trump did not.
 
It was part of foreign policy....Ukraine is a foreign country....nobody is excusing it, it was a legit thing to do.
Horseshit.

If Trump took a bribe to hold back millitary aid to Ukraine, would that be a corrupt, impeachable offense? OF COURSE it would be and the fact that it was part of foreign policy would not change that fact in any shape or form.

Trump CORRUPTLY pressured Ukraine for his personal electortal interests and against American foreign policy interests.
 
No moron, there many corrupt acts that could involve Ukraine.

If Trump took a bribe to hold back millitary aid to Ukraine, would that be a corrupt, impeachable offense? OF COURSE it would be and the fact that it was part of foreign policy would not change that fact in any shape or form.

Trump CORRUPTLY pressured Ukraine for his personal electortal interests and against American foreign policy interests.
hhahahha of course there could be....

no trump didn't do anything of the sort...we have the telephone call transcript...nothing you said is what he did...you are merely repeating debunked Adam Shifty parody
 
Xiden certainly did. He bragged about it.

Trump did not.
He bragged about conducting good foreign policy. He bragged about forcing Ukraine to remove a corrupt prosecutor, as part of our goals to clean up Ukraine's act.

He well earned it.
 
hhahahha of course there could be....
"hahha" thanks for agreeing with my point compeletely, but wasting everyone's time by taking 6 posts to finally get it.

Nothing about Trump's actions is excused by the fact that it was foreign policy.
 
Okay but stay focused. What Trump did was treasonist. Did they get something wrong?

Let me give you an example. Trump got on TV and told the proud boys to stand by. A guy like you will argue that's not evidence he's coordinating with them. Don't worry. We have more evidence.

Are you trying to pull a johnny cockren? Remember he got OJ off just because Mark Furhman lied about never saying the N word? You know despite whatever this is you're showing us, Trump is guilty as fuck. And you try to downplay the insurrection? Do you still after watching all that video footage?

LOL.

"Stay focused on Trump caused an INSURRECTION, ooooooo, ahhhhhhhhh".
 
no trump didn't do anything of the sort...
Facts say you are full of shit.

Trump was pressuring Ukraine for a public investigation of Bidens on that call and Trump's OMB director directly admitted to holding up millitary aid to Ukraine at Trump's direction, an act ruled illegal by GAO.
 
"hahha" thanks for agreeing with my point compeletely, but wasting everyone's time by taking 6 posts to finally get it.

Nothing about Trump's actions is excused by the fact that it was foreign policy.
I didn't agree with your point completely...you made zero sense. Nobody ever said people couldn't do things that were corrupt....the point being made was that a quid pro relationship isn't always corrupt.

Nobody is making any excuse for what Trump did, it was perfectly legit. Dembots are trying to make excuses for their abuse of power in that impeachment, by using parody
 
I didn't agree with your point completely...you made zero sense. Nobody ever said people couldn't do things that were corrupt....the point being made was that a quid pro relationship isn't always corrupt.
Moron, you notice how you are not mentioning FOREIGN POLICY? Because you've agreed with my point that it is an irrelevant distiction here.

Yes you do agree with that point completely, you just don't have even most basic honesty in your arguments to ever admit anything at all.
 
Nobody is making any excuse for what Trump did, it was perfectly legit.
It was perfectly corrupt.

Trump abused his office and illegally held up millitary aid to try to force a foreign country to publicly investigate his political opposition.

These are the facts and thats what he was impeached for.
 
Moron, you notice how you are not mentioning FOREIGN POLICY? Because you've agreed with my point that it is an irrelevant distiction here.

Yes you do agree with that point completely, you just don't have even most basic honesty in your arguments to ever admit anything at all.
I don't disagree...you can have corrupt acts in both foreign and domestic policies....but something being a quid pro is not corruption per se.
 
It was perfectly corrupt.

Trump abused his office and illegally held up millitary aid to try to force a foreign country to publicly investigate his political opposition.

These are the facts and thats what he was impeached for.
ahhah there was nothing corrupt about it....was Xiden corrupt when he threatened to withhold billions if someone wasn't fired? Was he corrupt when as President he did without military aid until after he met with Putin?
 
ahhah there was nothing corrupt about it...

Except everything I've explained like 20 times by now.

Can you refute even a word of:

Trump was pressuring Ukraine for a public investigation of Bidens on that call and Trump's OMB director directly admitted to holding up millitary aid to Ukraine at Trump's direction, an act ruled illegal by GAO.

No you can't, so get lost.
 
was Xiden corrupt when he threatened to withhold billions if someone wasn't fired?
Biden forcing Ukraine to remove a corrupt investigator was directly in line with our foreign policy goal of getting Ukraine to address it's corruption. It was an action supported by IMF, DoS, Ukrainian corruption watch groups and prosecutor's own deputy who described that office as the swamp.

Why the hell would you claim that is a corrupt act?
 

Forum List

Back
Top