koshergrl
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2011
- 81,136
- 14,068
- 2,190
"ItÂ’s sad that a man who engaged in horrific acts of barbarism will never be as known to the public as Casey Anthony or George Zimmerman because GosnellÂ’s crime is viewed as less than a crime by the vast majority of the producers of American news."
"Gosnell is now on trial two years after his arrest. The stories coming from the trial via the few outlets willing to pay attention are horrific and gruesome. But whatÂ’s more, similar stories are trickling out from other abortion clinics. The uncommon barbarism of Kermit GosnellÂ’s clinic turns out to be more common than most might imagine.
"But they wonÂ’t imagine it. Like with Dave Weigel from Slate, most reporters have never paid attention to the trial or the horrors of many abortion clinics. Reporters lean left, are sympathetic to abortion, and view the rightÂ’s demands for coverage unsympathetically because of the reportersÂ’ biases.
"Within the media coverage Gosnell is either a story they covered in 2011 or something they wonÂ’t cover at all. If they cover it now, they do so in passing so they can say they covered it. But they wonÂ’t devote the resources to it as they would if Gosnell had killed dogs. He only killed babies."
Can You Imagine the Coverage If It Were Dogs? | RedState
"Gosnell is now on trial two years after his arrest. The stories coming from the trial via the few outlets willing to pay attention are horrific and gruesome. But whatÂ’s more, similar stories are trickling out from other abortion clinics. The uncommon barbarism of Kermit GosnellÂ’s clinic turns out to be more common than most might imagine.
"But they wonÂ’t imagine it. Like with Dave Weigel from Slate, most reporters have never paid attention to the trial or the horrors of many abortion clinics. Reporters lean left, are sympathetic to abortion, and view the rightÂ’s demands for coverage unsympathetically because of the reportersÂ’ biases.
"Within the media coverage Gosnell is either a story they covered in 2011 or something they wonÂ’t cover at all. If they cover it now, they do so in passing so they can say they covered it. But they wonÂ’t devote the resources to it as they would if Gosnell had killed dogs. He only killed babies."
Can You Imagine the Coverage If It Were Dogs? | RedState