There were FOUR documented cases of voter fraud in 2012 - FOUR more in 2016

[progressive hunter]

And one in four Americans voted mail-in or absentee in 2016 (btw - in most states there is no difference between the two)

By the Numbers: Voter Fraud

www.pbs.org

Counting the documented cases of voter fraud in 2016

There are a grand total of four documented cases of voter fraud this year. Take a wild guess which political party they belong to.

www.msnbc.com

Obviously this year, it will probably be more in the range of 60-70%.
But no Donald, it won't take "years" to count them.
You'll be leaving on January 20th one way or the other.

28 Million Mail-In Ballots Went Missing in Last Four Elections | RealClearPolitics

Between 2012 and 2018, 28.3 million mail-in ballots remain unaccounted for, according to data from the federal Election Assistance Commission. The missing...

www.realclearpolitics.com

 

[progressive hunter]

And one in four Americans voted mail-in or absentee in 2016 (btw - in most states there is no difference between the two)

By the Numbers: Voter Fraud

www.pbs.org

Counting the documented cases of voter fraud in 2016

There are a grand total of four documented cases of voter fraud this year. Take a wild guess which political party they belong to.

www.msnbc.com

Obviously this year, it will probably be more in the range of 60-70%.
But no Donald, it won't take "years" to count them.
You'll be leaving on January 20th one way or the other.

Voter Fraud Is Real. Here’s The Proof

Data suggests millions of voter registrations are fraudulent or invalid. That’s enough voter fraud to tip an election, easily.

thefederalist.com

 

[wamose]

Democrats have proven that they're capable of perjury, burning, looting, destruction, treason and murder. They have spent 3 1/2 years fabricating stories to impeach Trump. They even employed the President, FBI, DOJ and foreign countries to run their coup. These criminals are certainly capable of voting fraud. In fact, there's no doubt they are studying all the possibilities as we speak. Classless Dems. don't have the integrity to allow a fair election to take place.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

And one in four Americans voted mail-in or absentee in 2016 (btw - in most states there is no difference between the two)

I'm not concerned about fraud in mail in voting as much as I am worried about ballots not getting delivered or counted. Someone just posted an article in another thread, and it's been posted before, about how over 20 million mail in ballots were lost between 2012 and 2018. In New York, they just finalized their primary results from a month ago, two days ago, because they were still counting ballots. In California's March presidential primary, the state rejected 1.5% of mail in ballots due to various reasons. Consider that Trump won Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin by less than 1% and the ramifications it could have.

Unless it's a landslide blowout for Biden, I think there is a fair possibility we may not know who the winner is until after the first of the year. Most states simply aren't prepared to handle the influx of a mail-in only election and lawsuits will be flying left and right in every close state.

 

[progressive hunter]

And one in four Americans voted mail-in or absentee in 2016 (btw - in most states there is no difference between the two)

I'm not concerned about fraud in mail in voting as much as I am worried about ballots not getting delivered or counted. Someone just posted an article in another thread, and it's been posted before, about how over 20 million mail in ballots were lost between 2012 and 2018. In New York, they just finalized their primary results from a month ago, two days ago, because they were still counting ballots. In California's March presidential primary, the state rejected 1.5% of mail in ballots due to various reasons. Consider that Trump won Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin by less than 1% and the ramifications it could have.

Unless it's a landslide blowout for Biden, I think there is a fair possibility we may not know who the winner is until after the first of the year. Most states simply aren't prepared to handle the influx of a mail-in only election and lawsuits will be flying left and right in every close state.

it could also be a blowout fo trump,,,

 

[DrLove]

And one in four Americans voted mail-in or absentee in 2016 (btw - in most states there is no difference between the two)

I'm not concerned about fraud in mail in voting as much as I am worried about ballots not getting delivered or counted. Someone just posted an article in another thread, and it's been posted before, about how over 20 million mail in ballots were lost between 2012 and 2018. In New York, they just finalized their primary results from a month ago, two days ago, because they were still counting ballots. In California's March presidential primary, the state rejected 1.5% of mail in ballots due to various reasons. Consider that Trump won Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin by less than 1% and the ramifications it could have.

Unless it's a landslide blowout for Biden, I think there is a fair possibility we may not know who the winner is until after the first of the year. Most states simply aren't prepared to handle the influx of a mail-in only election and lawsuits will be flying left and right in every close state.

Yep, Donald will definitely have his sidekick Billy Barf filing lawsuits left and right. Won't matter though. Might be a month to get everything counted, but he'll be a statistical goner within a week.

 

[bodecea]

It is estimated that over 90% of child molestation and 95% of rapes go unreported.

Does their lack of documentation mean they didn't happen?

So...voting is like child molestation and rape.....remember, you heard it here from trumpanzees, folks.

 

[bodecea]

Remember who becomes President in January if the election hasn't been decided by then.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Yep, Donald will definitely have his sidekick Billy Barf filing lawsuits left and right.

As will Biden, but you already knew that.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

it could also be a blowout fo trump,,,

Only to those in denial

 

[progressive hunter]

it could also be a blowout fo trump,,,

Only to those in denial

the way democrats are behaving they may even get me to vote for him,,

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Tramp said it himself,

Republican's are hurt by mail in voting!!

Republicans aren't very big on Cheating in elections, aren't very experienced. Do you think the GOP should "pick up their game" on this?

Oh they invented it. Why do you think there is not a recount in Utah. They started mail in voting when Obama won.

wow....some black women sure hate America.....men too

 

[DrLove]

Yep, Donald will definitely have his sidekick Billy Barf filing lawsuits left and right.

As will Biden, but you already knew that.

Bet? Month off from posting for the loser but we'll still let you moderate

 

[Crepitus]

No one has ever burglarized my home.

I guess I can leave the house unlocked.

Wait, so we've moved from "there will be massive voter fraud" to "there might be massive voter fraud"?

And you want to disenfranchise or endanger millionth of people over it?

What about the millions who will be disenfranchised by mail ballot?

Who?

 

[Crepitus]

Second, he went WAY BEYOND speaking of the election, with "ONE WAY OR THE OTHER."

Who didnt think that includes assassination?

Oh the hyperbole!!!!

You can't really be that stupid.

 

[Crepitus]

You'll be leaving on January 20th one way or the other

Did you just make a threat against the president?

First of all, he's not a legitimate president. Never has been.

Second, pointing out that he will lose the election is not a threat.

Don't worry. You're not a legitimate member. Thus your opinion is less than worthless to everyone on this forum. You're nothing but meatless one-liners that offer you and your minions masturbation material.

Well why don't you just go masturbate your legitimate member over there and leave me out of it.

 

[daveman]

First of all, he's not a legitimate president. Never has been.

 

[Crepitus]

First of all, he's not a legitimate president. Never has been.

If he was legitimate he wouldn't need to keep supressing evidence and manipulating the DOJ.

 

[daveman]

First of all, he's not a legitimate president. Never has been.

If he was legitimate he wouldn't need to keep supressing evidence and manipulating the DOJ.

Of course, it's not like you'd accept ANY Republican President.

 

[Crepitus]

Act

First of all, he's not a legitimate president. Never has been.

If he was legitimate he wouldn't need to keep supressing evidence and manipulating the DOJ.

Of course, it's not like you'd accept ANY Republican President.

Actually that didn't have a real problem with Bush 1. Bush 2 was kinda on the stupid side but not tRuly objectionable either. Reagan was an animal, tRump is a malevolent whack-job.