DING I'm going with Yet Another Speculation Fallacy for 600, Alex.
You have to understand --- there's the real world, and there's the Imaginarium. They're two different things.
It is however informative to see you white-knighting for fucking racists.
I have literally posted, in this very thread, irrefutable evidence of mainstream media blatantly ignoring a black man who shot 4 people at random yet ran 3 separate stories on white men who "threatened" a mass shooting but never actually shot anyone -- and you call that speculative and imaginary?
Boy, if stupid could fly you'd be a fucking F-15.
For those who missed it let's play it back in slo-mo:
That's what we call "speculation", Whizzo. An emotion-based whim offering no evidence, just "feelings". And AGAIN --- inserting "race" where it wasn't brought up. Which is the same thing you did, except you were too chickenshit to say so.
THIS JUST IN - the vast majority of mass shootings, lethal ones and otherwise, ARE done not only by whites but even more so by males. WHO KNEW.
Wow. You are hopelessly fucking dim. The very premise of the thread was that it was not being reported far and wide because the shooter was black and I made no effort to hide that. Everyone but you seems to understand it. Next time I'll be sure to spell it out for you in pretty colors with crayon so you don't get left behind.
That's a cute meltdown but it completely avoids the point I just pointed out about what a Speculation Fallacy is.
Yep, you made no effort to hide the fact that a story of no more than local interest, i.e. an incident in an area where a news audience may have commuted that day, did not make national news. Local stories never do. What you did make an effort to hide was the race thing. Then you admitted it later when you got cornered.
