There she goes! The bizarre escapades of Hillary Rodham Clinton

But does any reasonable person think minorities are going to turn out for an old, rich white woman as heavily as they did a young, charismatic Obama?

You would be unpleasantly surprised. If you properly mislead a voter, they'll vote for you even if you were a one eyed cyclops.


Not minority voters. The Obama election was obviously historic. Hillary's best shot is to energize female voters for the same reason.

However, it will be a tough sell when she accepts money from Countries like Saudi Arabia that brutalize women and she pays women on her Senate staff .72 cents on the dollar compared to the men.

You see, this is a perfect example of what I was talking about.

The fact that one of the largest and prolific non-profits in the world (that Hillary has nothing to do with the day-to-day operation of) takes donations for Saudi Arabia isn't actually a scandal.
She lives off that money. How can it not mean anything? What does the Clinton foundation actually do anyway? I don't see much in the news about where this money is supposedly going and what has been done.
google it
 
But does any reasonable person think minorities are going to turn out for an old, rich white woman as heavily as they did a young, charismatic Obama?

You would be unpleasantly surprised. If you properly mislead a voter, they'll vote for you even if you were a one eyed cyclops.


Not minority voters. The Obama election was obviously historic. Hillary's best shot is to energize female voters for the same reason.

However, it will be a tough sell when she accepts money from Countries like Saudi Arabia that brutalize women and she pays women on her Senate staff .72 cents on the dollar compared to the men.

You see, this is a perfect example of what I was talking about.

The fact that one of the largest and prolific non-profits in the world (that Hillary has nothing to do with the day-to-day operation of) takes donations for Saudi Arabia isn't actually a scandal.
She lives off that money. How can it not mean anything? What does the Clinton foundation actually do anyway? I don't see much in the news about where this money is supposedly going and what has been done.


Per reports the "Foundation" is a private Clinton piggie bank. Per media reports they keep .90 cents of every dollar raised. Only .10 cents goes out for "charity."

It is a scam.
Link please, on the 90 cents on the dollar bull you posted. ;)
 
But does any reasonable person think minorities are going to turn out for an old, rich white woman as heavily as they did a young, charismatic Obama?

You would be unpleasantly surprised. If you properly mislead a voter, they'll vote for you even if you were a one eyed cyclops.


Not minority voters. The Obama election was obviously historic. Hillary's best shot is to energize female voters for the same reason.

However, it will be a tough sell when she accepts money from Countries like Saudi Arabia that brutalize women and she pays women on her Senate staff .72 cents on the dollar compared to the men.

You see, this is a perfect example of what I was talking about.

The fact that one of the largest and prolific non-profits in the world (that Hillary has nothing to do with the day-to-day operation of) takes donations for Saudi Arabia isn't actually a scandal.
She lives off that money. How can it not mean anything? What does the Clinton foundation actually do anyway? I don't see much in the news about where this money is supposedly going and what has been done.

Clinton Foundation - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

As far as I've been able to find, Hillary Clinton has never taken a salary from the Clinton Foundation. I would be utterly shocked if she did.
 
But does any reasonable person think minorities are going to turn out for an old, rich white woman as heavily as they did a young, charismatic Obama?

You would be unpleasantly surprised. If you properly mislead a voter, they'll vote for you even if you were a one eyed cyclops.


Not minority voters. The Obama election was obviously historic. Hillary's best shot is to energize female voters for the same reason.

However, it will be a tough sell when she accepts money from Countries like Saudi Arabia that brutalize women and she pays women on her Senate staff .72 cents on the dollar compared to the men.
Agree her best shot is to energize female voters.

Your last paragraph was PROVEN to be false....her public records of staff salaries show males were not paid more than females...when they were examined.

But it should NOT turn into I hate males. That is very bad for America.
I AGREE and of course it should not be that! It has nothing to do with any of that...
 
But does any reasonable person think minorities are going to turn out for an old, rich white woman as heavily as they did a young, charismatic Obama?

You would be unpleasantly surprised. If you properly mislead a voter, they'll vote for you even if you were a one eyed cyclops.


Not minority voters. The Obama election was obviously historic. Hillary's best shot is to energize female voters for the same reason.

However, it will be a tough sell when she accepts money from Countries like Saudi Arabia that brutalize women and she pays women on her Senate staff .72 cents on the dollar compared to the men.

You see, this is a perfect example of what I was talking about.

The fact that one of the largest and prolific non-profits in the world (that Hillary has nothing to do with the day-to-day operation of) takes donations for Saudi Arabia isn't actually a scandal.

The largest and most prolific non profits in the world has her last name all over it. You don't need to be the sole overseer of day to day operations. Simply to have your namesake affixed to a foundation that takes money from countries who abuse women is a scandal, it reflects on your values and your honesty.

The classic defense. "That scandal is not, in fact, a scandal."

Here's a hint: If the only way you can justify that it's a scandal is the optics of it, it's not actually a scandal.
 
But does any reasonable person think minorities are going to turn out for an old, rich white woman as heavily as they did a young, charismatic Obama?

You would be unpleasantly surprised. If you properly mislead a voter, they'll vote for you even if you were a one eyed cyclops.


Not minority voters. The Obama election was obviously historic. Hillary's best shot is to energize female voters for the same reason.

However, it will be a tough sell when she accepts money from Countries like Saudi Arabia that brutalize women and she pays women on her Senate staff .72 cents on the dollar compared to the men.

You see, this is a perfect example of what I was talking about.

The fact that one of the largest and prolific non-profits in the world (that Hillary has nothing to do with the day-to-day operation of) takes donations for Saudi Arabia isn't actually a scandal.


Not calling it a scandal. I am calling it deeply hypocritical. How can you in good conscious be a "woman's advocate," and yet take money from regimes that support genital mutilation of women and virtual serfdom?

Sorry Doc....it is a legitimate issue to bring up in the campaign, and it will be used heavily against her.

"She" didn't take any money.

But does any reasonable person think minorities are going to turn out for an old, rich white woman as heavily as they did a young, charismatic Obama?

You would be unpleasantly surprised. If you properly mislead a voter, they'll vote for you even if you were a one eyed cyclops.


Not minority voters. The Obama election was obviously historic. Hillary's best shot is to energize female voters for the same reason.

However, it will be a tough sell when she accepts money from Countries like Saudi Arabia that brutalize women and she pays women on her Senate staff .72 cents on the dollar compared to the men.

You see, this is a perfect example of what I was talking about.

The fact that one of the largest and prolific non-profits in the world (that Hillary has nothing to do with the day-to-day operation of) takes donations for Saudi Arabia isn't actually a scandal.
She lives off that money. How can it not mean anything? What does the Clinton foundation actually do anyway? I don't see much in the news about where this money is supposedly going and what has been done.


Per reports the "Foundation" is a private Clinton piggie bank. Per media reports they keep .90 cents of every dollar raised. Only .10 cents goes out for "charity."

It is a scam.

What the **** is "Per media"?

Link?
 
You would be unpleasantly surprised. If you properly mislead a voter, they'll vote for you even if you were a one eyed cyclops.


Not minority voters. The Obama election was obviously historic. Hillary's best shot is to energize female voters for the same reason.

However, it will be a tough sell when she accepts money from Countries like Saudi Arabia that brutalize women and she pays women on her Senate staff .72 cents on the dollar compared to the men.

You see, this is a perfect example of what I was talking about.

The fact that one of the largest and prolific non-profits in the world (that Hillary has nothing to do with the day-to-day operation of) takes donations for Saudi Arabia isn't actually a scandal.
She lives off that money. How can it not mean anything? What does the Clinton foundation actually do anyway? I don't see much in the news about where this money is supposedly going and what has been done.


Per reports the "Foundation" is a private Clinton piggie bank. Per media reports they keep .90 cents of every dollar raised. Only .10 cents goes out for "charity."

It is a scam.
Link please, on the 90 cents on the dollar bull you posted. ;)

Try visual evidence, milady.

 
But does any reasonable person think minorities are going to turn out for an old, rich white woman as heavily as they did a young, charismatic Obama?

You would be unpleasantly surprised. If you properly mislead a voter, they'll vote for you even if you were a one eyed cyclops.


Not minority voters. The Obama election was obviously historic. Hillary's best shot is to energize female voters for the same reason.

However, it will be a tough sell when she accepts money from Countries like Saudi Arabia that brutalize women and she pays women on her Senate staff .72 cents on the dollar compared to the men.

You see, this is a perfect example of what I was talking about.

The fact that one of the largest and prolific non-profits in the world (that Hillary has nothing to do with the day-to-day operation of) takes donations for Saudi Arabia isn't actually a scandal.
She lives off that money. How can it not mean anything? What does the Clinton foundation actually do anyway? I don't see much in the news about where this money is supposedly going and what has been done.

Clinton Foundation - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

As far as I've been able to find, Hillary Clinton has never taken a salary from the Clinton Foundation. I would be utterly shocked if she did.


Where is all the money going? There are dozens of articles indicating the Clintons are using Foundation money for Hillary's campaign...travel costs etc.

They are using the "Foundation" as a personal piggie bank. Here is one link to a reputable publication. There are dozens more.


Bill Clinton rebuts misleading report on his charity s finances TheHill
 
You would be unpleasantly surprised. If you properly mislead a voter, they'll vote for you even if you were a one eyed cyclops.


Not minority voters. The Obama election was obviously historic. Hillary's best shot is to energize female voters for the same reason.

However, it will be a tough sell when she accepts money from Countries like Saudi Arabia that brutalize women and she pays women on her Senate staff .72 cents on the dollar compared to the men.

You see, this is a perfect example of what I was talking about.

The fact that one of the largest and prolific non-profits in the world (that Hillary has nothing to do with the day-to-day operation of) takes donations for Saudi Arabia isn't actually a scandal.
She lives off that money. How can it not mean anything? What does the Clinton foundation actually do anyway? I don't see much in the news about where this money is supposedly going and what has been done.

Clinton Foundation - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

As far as I've been able to find, Hillary Clinton has never taken a salary from the Clinton Foundation. I would be utterly shocked if she did.


Where is all the money going? There are dozens of articles indicating the Clintons are using Foundation money for Hillary's campaign...travel costs etc.

They are using the "Foundation" as a personal piggie bank. Here is one link to a reputable publication. There are dozens more.


Bill Clinton rebuts misleading report on his charity s finances TheHill

I don't think that article says what you think it says.
 
She's really got you guys worried.

How many Hillary threads have you started in the last few days?

Don't know, I saw 5 identical threads started by the same member, same title, same content, last night. Don't think he was from our side.
 
Not minority voters. The Obama election was obviously historic. Hillary's best shot is to energize female voters for the same reason.

However, it will be a tough sell when she accepts money from Countries like Saudi Arabia that brutalize women and she pays women on her Senate staff .72 cents on the dollar compared to the men.

You see, this is a perfect example of what I was talking about.

The fact that one of the largest and prolific non-profits in the world (that Hillary has nothing to do with the day-to-day operation of) takes donations for Saudi Arabia isn't actually a scandal.
She lives off that money. How can it not mean anything? What does the Clinton foundation actually do anyway? I don't see much in the news about where this money is supposedly going and what has been done.

Clinton Foundation - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

As far as I've been able to find, Hillary Clinton has never taken a salary from the Clinton Foundation. I would be utterly shocked if she did.


Where is all the money going? There are dozens of articles indicating the Clintons are using Foundation money for Hillary's campaign...travel costs etc.

They are using the "Foundation" as a personal piggie bank. Here is one link to a reputable publication. There are dozens more.


Bill Clinton rebuts misleading report on his charity s finances TheHill

I don't think that article says what you think it says.


Yes it does. Google Clinton Foundation audit. You can see at least where some of the money is going. The Clintons are taking millions out of it. They are using their Foundation as a piggie bank.

It is yet another major campaign issue for Hillary.

Key questions:

1. Of the roughly $200,000,000 million raised...how much went into actual charitable funding?

2. Hillary....how much money have you taken out of the Foundation for "expenses"....that is travel or otherwise?



Doc....these are very legitimate question that will have to be clearly answered at some point. Don't you want to know?
 
You see, this is a perfect example of what I was talking about.

The fact that one of the largest and prolific non-profits in the world (that Hillary has nothing to do with the day-to-day operation of) takes donations for Saudi Arabia isn't actually a scandal.
She lives off that money. How can it not mean anything? What does the Clinton foundation actually do anyway? I don't see much in the news about where this money is supposedly going and what has been done.

Clinton Foundation - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

As far as I've been able to find, Hillary Clinton has never taken a salary from the Clinton Foundation. I would be utterly shocked if she did.


Where is all the money going? There are dozens of articles indicating the Clintons are using Foundation money for Hillary's campaign...travel costs etc.

They are using the "Foundation" as a personal piggie bank. Here is one link to a reputable publication. There are dozens more.


Bill Clinton rebuts misleading report on his charity s finances TheHill

I don't think that article says what you think it says.


Yes it does. Google Clinton Foundation audit. You can see at least where some of the money is going. The Clintons are taking millions out of it. They are using their Foundation as a piggie bank.

It is yet another major campaign issue for Hillary.

Key questions:

1. Of the roughly $200,000,000 million raised...how much went into actual charitable funding?

2. Hillary....how much money have you taken out of the Foundation for "expenses"....that is travel or otherwise?



Doc....these are very legitimate question that will have to be clearly answered at some point. Don't you want to know?

The answer to your first question is right here: https://www.clintonfoundation.org/sites/default/files/clinton_foundation_report_public_11-19-14.pdf

As for your second question, I imagine that the Foundation paid for her travel when she was doing work for the foundation.
 
15th post
Here's a hint: If the only way you can justify that it's a scandal is the optics of it, it's not actually a scandal

Not just the optics. Read the financial report you posted earlier. Do some digging. How is it other people know this foundation takes money from people who abuse women?
 
Here's a hint: If the only way you can justify that it's a scandal is the optics of it, it's not actually a scandal

Not just the optics. Read the financial report you posted earlier. Do some digging. How is it other people know this foundation takes money from people who abuse women?

What do you mean "how is it other people know"? They know because the foundation released the information.

The foundation doesn't "take money from people who abuse women", they accepted donations from the government of Saudi Arabia, a US ally and significant trade partner - along with 30 or 40 other governments.

It's a charity. Why shouldn't they accept donations from whomever is willing to give?
 
You see, this is a perfect example of what I was talking about.

The fact that one of the largest and prolific non-profits in the world (that Hillary has nothing to do with the day-to-day operation of) takes donations for Saudi Arabia isn't actually a scandal.
She lives off that money. How can it not mean anything? What does the Clinton foundation actually do anyway? I don't see much in the news about where this money is supposedly going and what has been done.

Clinton Foundation - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

As far as I've been able to find, Hillary Clinton has never taken a salary from the Clinton Foundation. I would be utterly shocked if she did.


Where is all the money going? There are dozens of articles indicating the Clintons are using Foundation money for Hillary's campaign...travel costs etc.

They are using the "Foundation" as a personal piggie bank. Here is one link to a reputable publication. There are dozens more.


Bill Clinton rebuts misleading report on his charity s finances TheHill

I don't think that article says what you think it says.


Yes it does. Google Clinton Foundation audit. You can see at least where some of the money is going. The Clintons are taking millions out of it. They are using their Foundation as a piggie bank.

It is yet another major campaign issue for Hillary.

Key questions:

1. Of the roughly $200,000,000 million raised...how much went into actual charitable funding?

2. Hillary....how much money have you taken out of the Foundation for "expenses"....that is travel or otherwise?



Doc....these are very legitimate question that will have to be clearly answered at some point. Don't you want to know?

There's no doubt in my mind the Clintons have stolen millions from their charity. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a real sweet kid.
 
They know because the foundation released the information.

Precisely.

The foundation doesn't "take money from people who abuse women", they accepted donations from the government of Saudi Arabia, a US ally and significant trade partner - along with 30 or 40 other governments.

(sighs)

Just because someone is an "ally" and "trade partner" doesn't excuse what they do to innocent people on their own soil. Had she any values to uphold on her end, she wouldn't take a dime of their money. The government of Saudi Arabia is known for its human rights violations; and taking money from them only legitimizes them, but also their behavior.

It's a charity. Why shouldn't they accept donations from whomever is willing to give?

Charity? They are willing to grant charity to others but not to the women they abuse? Hardly charity, more like trying to maintain a false image.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom