There Is A Difference Between Heated Rhetoric And Incitement To Violence

[sparky]

two..... ~S~

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

.

That useless POS couldn't beat the s**t out of a three hour old kitten, but thinks it's mean enough to try.

.

And that's what the leftists call "psychiatry".


.
.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

.

He's Bulletproof. He has the Archangel Michael on his side. Unstoppable.

There is no way to stop him.

Amazon.com

But If I had my druthers, I'd ask that you not buy it from Amazon. They use your dollars for murdering unborn babies.


.

 

[Hollie]

This is heated rhetoric:





This is incitement to violence.






This isn't freedom of speech. This doesn't fall under the protection of the 1st Amendment.

"Do glass have to break?

When did ebonics become a thing?

 

[d0gbreath]

Virginia may have gone red (by a smaller margin at least) but other than the "vibrant" areas there's no BLM worries here.

The well to do white liberals (mostly .gov workers/contractors) have one thing in common with hinterland right-leaners.....They love them some law-enforcement and fund their JBTs to the max.

**** around and find out comes to mind.

Plus, you have the Cartwrights on the Ponderosa.

 

[San Souci]

"Do glass have to break?

When did ebonics become a thing?

Ebonics? You mean GhettoSpeak? It SUCKS. Just Jibber Jabber. Saying "Owi" instead of "Alright". Saying "Ax" instead of "Ask". Saying "I be goin' " instead of "I am going". Just examples. It is an ignorant ,degenerate ,bastardized form of English.