'There Has To Be Some Form Of Punishment'. Yes Mr. Trump, There Really Has To Be

[Kilroy2]

43 states. including CA and NY, compelled women to give birth against their will - and It was perfectly constitutional, under Roe.
43 states, including CA and NY, still do.

This proves what we already knew:
Democrats are authoritarian fascists.

I do not know where you get your source but let's put it in proper perspective.

california law is

Under California law, anyone in California who is pregnant has a legal right to choose to have an abortion before viability. A pregnancy becomes viable when a doctor determines that the fetus could live outside the uterus without extreme medical measures.

so it is allowed up to a certain point in time and then it is not allowed.

Your legal right to an abortion

In California, you have the legal right to choose to have an abortion before viability, or any time to protect your life and health.

abortion.ca.gov

NY

On April 7, 2023, two federal courts released rulings regarding Mifepristone, a component of the medication abortion regimen. Medication abortion remains safe and available in New York State.
Abortion has been legal under New York State law since 1970 – three years before the Roe v. Wade decision legalized abortion throughout the country. Because the right is codified in New York State law, federal decisions to limit access to abortion will not impact New York State.

Abortion in New York State: Know Your Rights

www.ny.gov

 

[Concerned American]

Well duh, the Supreme Court of the United States decisions of Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton decriminalized abortion nationwide in 1973. The Roe decision imposed a federally mandated uniform framework for state legislation on the subject.

Trump can ban abortion on the federal level and the new supreme court will take up the issue. This is Republican golden opportunity.

oh but it is a state level problem now?

Trump can't ban anything. Take your tin hat off and quit howling at the moon. The SCOTUS has already ruled that abortion is a states issue. That is why RvW is no longer valid. There is no and there will not be another national abortion law. It is not addressed as a right in the constitution, therefor it is a states rights issue. derp.

 

[Kilroy2]

Trump can't ban anything. Take your tin hat off and quit howling at the moon. The SCOTUS has already ruled that abortion is a states issue. That is why RvW is no longer valid. There is no and there will not be another national abortion law. It is not addressed as a right in the constitution, therefor it is a states rights issue. derp.

Gee you sound like a know it all.
asleep at the wheel.

Republicans are hard at work looking for that opportunity. To exploit that loophole.

Trump can ban abortion as the president. I didn't say it would work.

Trump would have several options to outlaw abortion without even needing lawmakers’ approval.



And if Donald Trump or any other Republican takes office, they can resort to using the Comstock Act, restricting the abortion pill mifepristone, or granting personhood rights to fetuses - a common right-wing idea now being circulated by the Heritage Foundation.

the office of the president can absolutely enact a number of measures that would effectively 'ban' abortion across the country - though most would simply restrict the procedure until it is nearly impossible to access.

And if Donald Trump or any other Republican takes office, they can resort to using the Comstock Act, restricting the abortion pill mifepristone, or granting personhood rights to fetuses - a common right-wing idea now being circulated by the Heritage Foundation.

Republican won't give up trying and look for the opportunity.

MSN

www.msn.com

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Their concern begins and ends with the assumption that a woman who chooses not to commit herself to pregnancy and forced, mandatory childbirth, is somehow grievously at fault, and it’s their business to step in and administer some form of “correction.” Once the person’s pregnancy is a fait accompli, the woman is effectively on her own. The forced-birth proponent then washes his hands of the matter, and — for all intents and purposes -- moves on to the next person whose behavior, in their warped view, needs controlling. At that time, all the platitudes and drivel about the “sanctity of life” and whatnot are tossed straight out the window.

This is how Donald Trump and almost all elected Republicans view abortion. It’s the reason why Donald Trump could haughtily declare, in 2016, that “there has to be some form of punishment” for women and others who try to terminate their own pregnancies.

Those consequences, however, are now surfacing in spades. As it turns out, people don’t like having their lives negated by Republican laws. They’re not buying into the idea that their behavior must be controlled and regulated by self-serving politicians. Nor do most of them give a damn about the theocratic, religious sensibilities of a misogynistic religious minority, whether those sensibilities are embedded in malevolent, restrictive legislation or spewed out by religious psychopaths on the Supreme Court.

But Trump was partly right about one thing: “There has to be,” in fact, “some form of punishment.” This November, the party that has willfully engineered this inhuman regime needs to be soundly taken to the woodshed and sent packing, Donald Trump most of all.

'There has to be some form of punishment.' Yes, Mr. Trump, there really has to be

Long before a Trump-seeded conservative Supreme Court finally overturned Roe v. Wade, one constant feature of the forced-birth lobby has been to treat abortion as a thing, an action wholly separate from the emotions and motivations from the people...

www.dailykos.com

Who's going to be your protector in prison Mr. Trump?

I missed Merchans sentencing today. What happened.

 

[Concerned American]

Gee you sound like a know it all.
asleep at the wheel.

Republicans are hard at work looking for that opportunity. To exploit that loophole.

Trump can ban abortion as the president. I didn't say it would work.

Trump would have several options to outlaw abortion without even needing lawmakers’ approval.



And if Donald Trump or any other Republican takes office, they can resort to using the Comstock Act, restricting the abortion pill mifepristone, or granting personhood rights to fetuses - a common right-wing idea now being circulated by the Heritage Foundation.

the office of the president can absolutely enact a number of measures that would effectively 'ban' abortion across the country - though most would simply restrict the procedure until it is nearly impossible to access.

And if Donald Trump or any other Republican takes office, they can resort to using the Comstock Act, restricting the abortion pill mifepristone, or granting personhood rights to fetuses - a common right-wing idea now being circulated by the Heritage Foundation.

Republican won't give up trying and look for the opportunity.

MSN

www.msn.com

You sound like a moron that didn't read his own opinion piece. It is opinion. It states that Trump would leave it up to the states as he is on record as saying since April. The opinion piece says people, like you, don't believe him. Who cares what you believe. Go howl at the moon, moron.