Compelling women to give birth against their will is the epitome of authoritarian fascism; punishing women with reckless, irresponsible abortion bans that jeopardize the health and lives of women is likewise the epitome of authoritarian fascism; and conservatives empowering the state at the expense of individual liberty is the epitome of authoritarian fascism.
Who is compelling them to spread their legs in the first place? Is that against their will? There is no need to ever let it get so far as needing to murder the baby with just the smallest amount of self responsibility applied. Your ilk is so careless and lazy, and still whining even though baby murder has not been banned at all.
You are the fascist, goosestepper.
Maybe that’s because some of us are openly Authoritarian.
Tell her to quit acting like Kamala and keep her legs shut.....Their concern begins and ends with the assumption that a woman who chooses not to commit herself to pregnancy and forced, mandatory childbirth, is somehow grievously at fault, and it’s their business to step in and administer some form of “correction.” Once the person’s pregnancy is a fait accompli, the woman is effectively on her own. The forced-birth proponent then washes his hands of the matter, and — for all intents and purposes -- moves on to the next person whose behavior, in their warped view, needs controlling. At that time, all the platitudes and drivel about the “sanctity of life” and whatnot are tossed straight out the window.
This is how Donald Trump and almost all elected Republicans view abortion. It’s the reason why Donald Trump could haughtily declare, in 2016, that “there has to be some form of punishment” for women and others who try to terminate their own pregnancies.
Those consequences, however, are now surfacing in spades. As it turns out, people don’t like having their lives negated by Republican laws. They’re not buying into the idea that their behavior must be controlled and regulated by self-serving politicians. Nor do most of them give a damn about the theocratic, religious sensibilities of a misogynistic religious minority, whether those sensibilities are embedded in malevolent, restrictive legislation or spewed out by religious psychopaths on the Supreme Court.
But Trump was partly right about one thing: “There has to be,” in fact, “some form of punishment.” This November, the party that has willfully engineered this inhuman regime needs to be soundly taken to the woodshed and sent packing, Donald Trump most of all.
'There has to be some form of punishment.' Yes, Mr. Trump, there really has to be
Long before a Trump-seeded conservative Supreme Court finally overturned Roe v. Wade, one constant feature of the forced-birth lobby has been to treat abortion as a thing, an action wholly separate from the emotions and motivations from the people...www.dailykos.com
Who's going to be your protector in prison Mr. Trump?
This is why I cannot believe democrats.Their concern begins and ends with the assumption that a woman who chooses not to commit herself to pregnancy and forced, mandatory childbirth, is somehow grievously at fault, and it’s their business to step in and administer some form of “correction.” Once the person’s pregnancy is a fait accompli, the woman is effectively on her own. The forced-birth proponent then washes his hands of the matter, and — for all intents and purposes -- moves on to the next person whose behavior, in their warped view, needs controlling. At that time, all the platitudes and drivel about the “sanctity of life” and whatnot are tossed straight out the window.
This is how Donald Trump and almost all elected Republicans view abortion. It’s the reason why Donald Trump could haughtily declare, in 2016, that “there has to be some form of punishment” for women and others who try to terminate their own pregnancies.
Those consequences, however, are now surfacing in spades. As it turns out, people don’t like having their lives negated by Republican laws. They’re not buying into the idea that their behavior must be controlled and regulated by self-serving politicians. Nor do most of them give a damn about the theocratic, religious sensibilities of a misogynistic religious minority, whether those sensibilities are embedded in malevolent, restrictive legislation or spewed out by religious psychopaths on the Supreme Court.
But Trump was partly right about one thing: “There has to be,” in fact, “some form of punishment.” This November, the party that has willfully engineered this inhuman regime needs to be soundly taken to the woodshed and sent packing, Donald Trump most of all.
'There has to be some form of punishment.' Yes, Mr. Trump, there really has to be
Long before a Trump-seeded conservative Supreme Court finally overturned Roe v. Wade, one constant feature of the forced-birth lobby has been to treat abortion as a thing, an action wholly separate from the emotions and motivations from the people...www.dailykos.com
Who's going to be your protector in prison Mr. Trump?
Something can be done to help you deal with your pain.
Their concern begins and ends with the assumption that a woman who chooses not to commit herself to pregnancy and forced, mandatory childbirth, is somehow grievously at fault, and it’s their business to step in and administer some form of “correction.” Once the person’s pregnancy is a fait accompli, the woman is effectively on her own. The forced-birth proponent then washes his hands of the matter, and — for all intents and purposes -- moves on to the next person whose behavior, in their warped view, needs controlling. At that time, all the platitudes and drivel about the “sanctity of life” and whatnot are tossed straight out the window.
This is how Donald Trump and almost all elected Republicans view abortion. It’s the reason why Donald Trump could haughtily declare, in 2016, that “there has to be some form of punishment” for women and others who try to terminate their own pregnancies.
Those consequences, however, are now surfacing in spades. As it turns out, people don’t like having their lives negated by Republican laws. They’re not buying into the idea that their behavior must be controlled and regulated by self-serving politicians. Nor do most of them give a damn about the theocratic, religious sensibilities of a misogynistic religious minority, whether those sensibilities are embedded in malevolent, restrictive legislation or spewed out by religious psychopaths on the Supreme Court.
But Trump was partly right about one thing: “There has to be,” in fact, “some form of punishment.” This November, the party that has willfully engineered this inhuman regime needs to be soundly taken to the woodshed and sent packing, Donald Trump most of all.
'There has to be some form of punishment.' Yes, Mr. Trump, there really has to be
Long before a Trump-seeded conservative Supreme Court finally overturned Roe v. Wade, one constant feature of the forced-birth lobby has been to treat abortion as a thing, an action wholly separate from the emotions and motivations from the people...www.dailykos.com
Who's going to be your protector in prison Mr. Trump?
Not all women who need an abortion seek it out of what you term " laziness". Some women need an abortion out of medical neccessity to save her life, you fucking asswipe.
www.snopes.com
jones is a bigot who is also a hypocrite......
So what? It is a states issue. There is no federal abortion law. Next.
So how did it work out for you when you took Trump and the GOP to the woodshed in November, Skews? Oh my...not like you thought? The public took in all of your dire pronouncements and chose to see them for what they were...scare tactics. They voted for Republicans and for Trump. Prison? Sunny Hostin's hubby may be headed there but Donald Trump sure as heck won't be!Their concern begins and ends with the assumption that a woman who chooses not to commit herself to pregnancy and forced, mandatory childbirth, is somehow grievously at fault, and it’s their business to step in and administer some form of “correction.” Once the person’s pregnancy is a fait accompli, the woman is effectively on her own. The forced-birth proponent then washes his hands of the matter, and — for all intents and purposes -- moves on to the next person whose behavior, in their warped view, needs controlling. At that time, all the platitudes and drivel about the “sanctity of life” and whatnot are tossed straight out the window.
This is how Donald Trump and almost all elected Republicans view abortion. It’s the reason why Donald Trump could haughtily declare, in 2016, that “there has to be some form of punishment” for women and others who try to terminate their own pregnancies.
Those consequences, however, are now surfacing in spades. As it turns out, people don’t like having their lives negated by Republican laws. They’re not buying into the idea that their behavior must be controlled and regulated by self-serving politicians. Nor do most of them give a damn about the theocratic, religious sensibilities of a misogynistic religious minority, whether those sensibilities are embedded in malevolent, restrictive legislation or spewed out by religious psychopaths on the Supreme Court.
But Trump was partly right about one thing: “There has to be,” in fact, “some form of punishment.” This November, the party that has willfully engineered this inhuman regime needs to be soundly taken to the woodshed and sent packing, Donald Trump most of all.
'There has to be some form of punishment.' Yes, Mr. Trump, there really has to be
Long before a Trump-seeded conservative Supreme Court finally overturned Roe v. Wade, one constant feature of the forced-birth lobby has been to treat abortion as a thing, an action wholly separate from the emotions and motivations from the people...www.dailykos.com
Who's going to be your protector in prison Mr. Trump?
Well duh, the Supreme Court of the United States decisions of Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton decriminalized abortion nationwide in 1973. The Roe decision imposed a federally mandated uniform framework for state legislation on the subject.
How'd that work out for you, champ?
How'd - that- work out for you, champ?
43 states. including CA and NY, compelled women to give birth against their will - and It was perfectly constitutional, under Roe.
