Dr. Phosphorous
Platinum Member
- Sep 3, 2024
- 10,042
- 6,259
- 938
- Banned
- #361
Why, shit-for-brains? Nobody held a gun to Comey's head and made him launch a new investigation of Hillary.1. He actually did have to do that![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why, shit-for-brains? Nobody held a gun to Comey's head and made him launch a new investigation of Hillary.1. He actually did have to do that![]()
No....because you are mentally ill.Because I can provide indisputable facts over and over which proves you’re uninformed, always lying, and committed to a failed & evil ideology? Cool
You've proven absolutely nothing, mentally ill racist MAGA dude.That’s a comical comment from someone who has been proven wrong over and over and over just in this thread alone![]()
Because the Executive Branch isn’t allowed to pick and choose which laws to uphold and which laws to protect. They are required to enforce the law. Hillary Clinton broke the law. James Comey was required to open an investigation. He was also required to recommend prosecution, but because he’s a left-wing asshole, he recommended against prosecution and the corrupt Obama Administration would never prosecute one of their own.Why…?1. He actually did have to do that![]()
But your claim is that the FBI is part of a liberal Deep State. Hence, Comey should have been trying to protect Hillary....and he did not.Because the Executive Branch isn’t allowed to pick and choose which laws to uphold and which laws to protect.
Sure....Like they are for the FBI being part of the Deep State?The receipts are all there, little guy. And boy do they have you “triggered”!
He did. No prosecution of Hillary despite indisputable proof of a crime. Your embarrassing yourself with your absurd mental gymnastics.But your claim is that the FBI is part of a liberal Deep State. Hence, Comey should have been trying to protect Hillary....and he did not.
You don't "protect" someone by announcing an investigation of someone a week before a ******* election.He did. No prosecution of Hillary despite indisputable proof of a crime. Your embarrassing yourself with your absurd mental gymnastics.
every crime requires mens rea.He did. No prosecution of Hillary despite indisputable proof of a crime. Your embarrassing yourself with your absurd mental gymnastics.
On a side note, it is SO liberal to be upset that Hillary “wasn’t protected” (when in fact she was) while not being upset over the fact that Hillary Clinton is a sleazy dirt-bag who was breaking the law (as all Democrats do).But your claim is that the FBI is part of a liberal Deep State. Hence, Comey should have been trying to protect Hillary....and he did not.
Do you ever get tired of being proven wrong?Comey said his agency found more than a hundred emails that contained information that was classified at the time they were sent and received — emails that should not have been on "any kind of unclassified system," Comey said.
No, mentally disturbed guy. If Comey was truly in your make-believe Deep State, then he would not have opened an investigation of Hillary right before the 2016 election. PERIOD.
The End.
Wrong.every crime requires mens rea.
It’s criminal intent or knowledge of wrong-doing.
Thanks for playing, Dud. You should probably stay out of law though as you don’t know much about it. People without “knowledge of wrong-doing” are prosecuted every single day in America. Millions of people per year in fact.The principle of "ignorance of the law is no excuse" means that even if someone is unaware of a law, they can still be held responsible for breaking it. This principle, also known as ignorantia juris non excusat in Latin, is a cornerstone of legal systems.
Correct. You “protect” them by refusing to prosecute their crimes.You don't "protect" someone by announcing an investigation of someone a week before a ******* election.
President Trump won the 2016 election because Hillary Clinton is the most unelectable candidate in the history of U.S. electionsTrump won the 2016 election because of Comey!!
Gimp, nobody in the "Deep State" launches an investigation of the Democratic candidate for President a week before the ******* election.On a side note, it is SO liberal to be upset that Hillary “wasn’t protected” (when in fact she was) while not being upset over the fact that Hillary Clinton is a sleazy dirt-bag who was breaking the law (as all Democrats do).
...and Comey helped Trump win, mentally ill MAGA dude.Correct. You “protect” them by refusing to prosecute their crimes.
President Trump won the 2016 election because Hillary Clinton is the most unelectable candidate in the history of U.S. elections
We the People cannot thank you Democrats enough for giving her the 2016 nomination![]()