The world leaping ahead of us, the U.S. still has no fast trains.

Even Africa has some.

Africa has AIDS

Pretty clever analogy Chip ! You're on your way.

Yea just what these africans need, a bullet train to the dump to look for scraps

Poverty-in-kenya.jpg
 
This is a bit long but it makes clear why high-speed rail is bad for Florida as well as the rest of the country.X Z CVz


I can see there is a huge misunderstanding of most people over what "High Speed Rail" actually is. And this is causing a lot of problems in actual communication.

In basic, conventional passenger trains are capped in the US at 59 mph. And freight trains at 49 in most areas. "High Speed Rail" is literally anything that travels at faster speeds. It may be at 65 mph, 75 mph, 90 mph, or higher.

The average speed of the Acela Express is 85 mph. It is HSR, because of the tracks, trains, and other factors (closed track system with no other traffic along any part of the route where they travel over 59 mph) makes it so. And many places are wanting to upgrade to HSR, as it lets them do other things as well. Replace older rail lines with newer ones. Dump the expensive hybrid diesel locomotives and move to all-electric ones. And the 20-50% increase in speed allows them to service more passengers without having to increase the number of trains or their size.

In fact, other than the silly system they are trying to build in California, I am not aware of any systems planning on building a true "Bullet Train" in the US. Only HSR, at speeds between 60 and 100 MPH. Not the 130 MPH plus of other countries. And in most cases, commuter rail can be rather cheaply converted to HSR. Primarily, the engines upgraded to newer ones, smoother tracks, and the route closed off to all other traffic so they operate independent of freight lines.

California has been making commuter rail lines for 30 years that are almost all capable of conversion to HSR with minimal expense. For example, most of the newer lines are isolated on their own independent rail system, with no connection to anything but commuter trains. Quite often in segments built specifically for them between freeways, so they can cheaply use existing right of ways without having to purchase additional land. Another I am aware of like this with this as a future consideration is the Concord-Oakland line, that mostly runs in between the East and West lanes of State Route 4. And many lines in LA are the same way. No need at the time of construction to become HSR, but minimal expense if they do so in the future.





Only 34 miles is rated for high speed.

Just sayin...
 
Back
Top Bottom