But it does not give you the right to have military grade heavy weapons.
You are the only person who keeps mentioning heavy weapons. I am talking about M-16' m-4 m-60's m-203's not artillary or tanks.
Thank you for that. You can have civilian versions of such weapons. But why do you need a grenade launcher? At least you are moving out of 'militiababble' finally.
Nope cockroach the militia needs the grenade launcher the M-60 the m203 the m-16 that is what the U.S. SUPERME COURT RULED.
Remember U.S. v. Miller
Thus, for the keeping and bearing of a firearm to be constitutionally protected, the firearm should be a militia-type arm.
Remember U.S. vs. Emerson "Although, as we have held, the Second Amendment does
protect individual rights, that does not mean that those rights may
never be made subject to any limited, narrowly tailored specific
exceptions or restrictions for particular cases that are reasonable and
not inconsistent with
the right of Americans generally to individually
keep and bear their private arms as historically understood in this
country."
Remember Lewis v. United States(1980). , Lewis recognized -- in summarizing the holding of Miller, supra, as "the Second Amendment guarantees no right to keep and bear a firearm that does not have 'some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia'" (emphasis added)
Remeber the Militia is the people.
TITLE 10 > Subtitle A > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 311