bigreb, it's time for you to give it up. The law and the Amendment does not support your right to a M203 as a civilian. This is fun watching you militia types running around in circles like a bunch of maddened rats in a cage biting each other.
Really, thank you. Your entertainment here is truly unique, uniquely nuts, and a clarion cry to all Americans that the circus comes to town when the militia fruits meet in secret. With their infiltrators.
What a bunch of saps. Your neighbors will put you down if you are ever stupid enough to rise up.
Nope cockroach the militia needs the grenade launcher the M-60 the m203 the m-16 that is what the U.S. SUPERME COURT RULED.
Remember U.S. v. Miller
Thus, for the keeping and bearing of a firearm to be constitutionally protected, the firearm should be a militia-type arm.
Remember U.S. vs. Emerson "Although, as we have held, the Second Amendment does
protect individual rights, that does not mean that those rights may
never be made subject to any limited, narrowly tailored specific
exceptions or restrictions for particular cases that are reasonable and
not inconsistent with the right of Americans generally to individually
keep and bear their private arms as historically understood in this
country."
Remember Lewis v. United States(1980). , Lewis recognized -- in summarizing the holding of Miller, supra, as "the Second Amendment guarantees no right to keep and bear a firearm that does not have 'some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia'" (emphasis added)
Remember the Militia is the people.
TITLE 10 > Subtitle A > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 311