The woman whose child rape claim against Donald Trump was supposedly "covered up" in the Epstein Files says she realized she was repeatedly raped by -

[excalibur]

It was always BS.

And it was debunked some time ago. But desperation on the left brings it back, as they have brought back their entire 2016 playbook.

The woman whose child rape claim against Donald Trump was supposedly "covered up" in the Epstein Files says she realized she was repeatedly raped by a "Jeff Epstein" in the 1980s after hearing the name "Epstein" on a movie starring Barbra Streisand and Nick Nolte. Sounds legit​

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It was always BS.

And it was debunked some time ago. But desperation on the left brings it back, as they have brought back their entire 2016 playbook.

​

The woman whose child rape claim against Donald Trump was supposedly "covered up" in the Epstein Files says she realized she was repeatedly raped by a "Jeff Epstein" in the 1980s after hearing the name "Epstein" on a movie starring Barbra Streisand and Nick Nolte. Sounds legit​

Was her name E Jean Carroll??

 

[rightwinger]

Wrong Epstein

Must have been the Epstein from Welcome Back Kotter

 

[MarcATL]

Why are you debasing yourself by defending a pedophile OP?

You don't have to do this.

 

[2aguy]

It was always BS.

And it was debunked some time ago. But desperation on the left brings it back, as they have brought back their entire 2016 playbook.

​

The woman whose child rape claim against Donald Trump was supposedly "covered up" in the Epstein Files says she realized she was repeatedly raped by a "Jeff Epstein" in the 1980s after hearing the name "Epstein" on a movie starring Barbra Streisand and Nick Nolte. Sounds legit​

This.....

And this brings us to the heart of the matter: evidence.

There is no physical evidence supporting the allegation.

No documentation.

No contemporaneous report.

No witness testimony that has ever been vetted in a courtroom.

No real-world identification of the accuser.

No testimony under oath.

No confirmed timeline or corroborating detail that survives scrutiny.

Conversely, there is ample evidence pointing toward fabrication.

The plaintiff’s address was fake.

Her real identity and story could not be verified.

The case was filed three separate times by people who refused to identify themselves.

The filings changed details between versions.

The supporting statements were anonymous, unverifiable, and in some cases contradictory.

The man promoting the claims had a long and public history of hoaxes, hailing from The Jerry Springer Show, itself renowned for hiring actors to stage outlandish scandals.

The accuser disappeared immediately after the press conference collapsed.

And the dismissal came at the precise moment when journalists were beginning to expose inconsistencies.

-----------

The accusation first surfaced in April 2016, when an anonymous woman identifying herself as “Katie Johnson” filed a lawsuit in California claiming that Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein had raped her when she was 13 years old in 1994. The filing had no attorney, no supporting documents, no credible witness evidence, and no verifiable identity.

DailyMail.com reported that ‘Katie’ had two DUIs and a felony drug possession on her record, along with a history of drug abuse.

Within weeks, it was dismissed for failing to meet even the minimal standards of federal civil procedure. The court attempted to mail the dismissal to the address Johnson had provided — and the letter came back as undeliverable. When journalists later traced the address, it turned out not to be a functioning residence at all, but a derelict shack in the desert near Twentynine Palms. That detail alone raised red flags. People filing genuine sexual assault lawsuits don’t generally provide vacant buildings as their home address. But the strangeness didn’t stop there.

A second version of the lawsuit appeared in New York federal court in June 2016, this time under the pseudonym “Jane Doe.” The complaint was similar but slightly refined, with two supporting statements from anonymous women claiming to corroborate Johnson’s allegations. But again, nothing about the filing resembled a legitimate civil action. There was no identification. No clear chain of evidence. No physical proof. And the supporting affidavits were impossible to verify — one was digitally signed, another allegedly provided by a “Tiffany Doe” whose role in the narrative seemed to expand and collapse depending on which version of the suit was filed. The details were inconsistent, and the tone of the documents read more like a script written for maximum emotional impact than a sworn legal complaint built on verifiable fact.

Then came the third filing, in September 2016, just weeks before the presidential election. This version was more polished, more elaborate, and backed by an attorney, though not one familiar with high-stakes federal litigation. But again, the case never reached an evidentiary hearing. No judge assessed the claims. No witness was ever cross-examined. No facts were tested. And before any of that could occur, the plaintiff abruptly withdrew the suit.

-----

And when the Guardian investigated the origins of the Trump–Epstein filing in 2016, Lubow’s fingerprints were everywhere. He contacted journalists posing as a representative of the anonymous accuser. He sent emails dripping with tabloid rhythms. He promoted the lawsuits directly to media outlets. And he appeared to be pulling the strings behind the scenes, shaping the narrative while hiding behind a rotating set of pseudonyms. If the allegation had been legitimate, its origins would not trace back to a man known for fakery. And yet that’s exactly where they led.

Journalists who attempted to meet the supposed accuser found only contradictions. The address didn’t exist. The phone number didn’t work. The plaintiff could never be located.

The most dramatic moment came in early November 2016, when a press conference was scheduled at the Los Angeles office of attorney Lisa Bloom. The event was heavily promoted. Reporters gathered. The cameras were ready. For the first time, the anonymous accuser was supposed to appear publicly, to state her claim in her own voice. Instead, Bloom walked out alone. The accuser, she announced, would not be coming. She had received threats, Bloom said, and was too frightened to appear. Within forty-eight hours, the lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed.

DEBUNKED: A Woman Filed a Lawsuit Against Donald Trump, Claiming He and Jeffrey Epstein Abused Her - But it Was All a Politically-Motivated Lie

A Jerry Springer prankster, an anonymous women, and the flash in the pan lawsuit that won't go away.

www.jaybeecher.com

 

[Rawley]

Why are you debasing yourself by defending a pedophile OP?

You don't have to do this.

LOL After you defended an incestuous pedophile for four years? LOL

 

[1srelluc]

Wrong Epstein

View attachment 1223942


Must have been the Epstein from Welcome Back Kotter

Nah, she would have mentioned the BBC.

 

[Dante]

It was always BS.

And it was debunked some time ago. But desperation on the left brings it back, as they have brought back their entire 2016 playbook.

​

The woman whose child rape claim against Donald Trump was supposedly "covered up" in the Epstein Files says she realized she was repeatedly raped by a "Jeff Epstein" in the 1980s after hearing the name "Epstein" on a movie starring Barbra Streisand and Nick Nolte. Sounds legit​

If true...

your "debunked shit is just that shit.

Why?

Why does Trump keep fighting full disclosure, like the Clintons and others do not?

 

[Cassandro]

Was her name E Jean Carroll??

Christine Blasey Ford?

 

[Darkwind]

It was always BS.

And it was debunked some time ago. But desperation on the left brings it back, as they have brought back their entire 2016 playbook.

​

The woman whose child rape claim against Donald Trump was supposedly "covered up" in the Epstein Files says she realized she was repeatedly raped by a "Jeff Epstein" in the 1980s after hearing the name "Epstein" on a movie starring Barbra Streisand and Nick Nolte. Sounds legit​

more #metoo

Back in my day, that would read, "Pound Me Too." But have you seen the ones claiming to have been raped?

Regardless of that, they face the same problem as they did during the Cavanaugh hearings. The witness cannot be believed.

 

[drudge X]

Why are you debasing yourself by defending a pedophile OP?

You don't have to do this.

You have proof right?

 

[Captain Creeper]

Michelle Obama raped me.

 

[Doc7505]

It was always BS.

And it was debunked some time ago. But desperation on the left brings it back, as they have brought back their entire 2016 playbook.

​

The woman whose child rape claim against Donald Trump was supposedly "covered up" in the Epstein Files says she realized she was repeatedly raped by a "Jeff Epstein" in the 1980s after hearing the name "Epstein" on a movie starring Barbra Streisand and Nick Nolte. Sounds legit​

<~~~~~~~~~~~>​

Seems we have another E.J. Carroll and fantasy rapes that never happened.
Especially when they can't remember dates.

 

[drudge X]

Michelle Obama raped me.

That psychological scar will never heal.

 

[Blaster]

Comedy Gold!

 

[Captain Creeper]

That psychological scar will never heal.

Nor will the fissures.

 

[MarcATL]

You have proof right?

You don't. Have. To do this.