JohnL.Burke said:
I'm not being "dishonest", suggesting that the aforementioned were assassinated and that I possess "proof". I'm being sarcastic. I was using your own method of argument against you as a way to make a point. My point being that conspiracy theories are easily mocked. You say you detect a "pattern" with me. I certainly hope so! A pattern of facts and logic should be a pattern most would want to achieve. I hope this clears up any confusion. Thank you.
John, you're turning out to be a "riot". LOL. Your sarcasm went completely over my head. Sarcasm only works when you know someone for some time...only then can you detect what is "out of the box" or "off the charts" for them. We just met. Hello?
What you suggested as "fact", could, in fact, be construed as "conspiracy theories", as you provided no links, no evidence to support your claims. I, on the other hand "did".
And again, you provide "humor" in the middle of a serious discussion. Logic? Facts? Where are those? What you provided amounted to opinion, and a point of view, with facts and logic, nowhere in sight. The confusion about where you were trying to go with all that, still exists. You're welcome. And might I add, your "measured" civility is most certainly "appreciated", while being refreshing.