The voters in Iran want freedom and they are crying for a democracy.

[Brn2bfree]

The voters in Iran want freedom and they are crying for a democracy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Very powerful!

Damn you Obama...this is your chance to change the face of the middle east. Bush did it with Iraq. Obama,...you could do it with Iran...without firing a shot. The Persian people are hungry for freedom.

With free democracies in the middle east...terrorism will wither on the vine.

 

[dilloduck]

The voters in Iran want freedom and they are crying for a democracy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Very powerful!

Damn you Obama...this is your chance to change the face of the middle east. Bush did it with Iraq. Obama,...you could do it with Iran...without firing a shot. The Persian people are hungry for freedom.

With free democracies in the middle east...terrorism will wither on the vine.

Don't they have their own guns ?

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

The voters in Iran want freedom and they are crying for a democracy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Very powerful!

Damn you Obama...this is your chance to change the face of the middle east. Bush did it with Iraq. Obama,...you could do it with Iran...without firing a shot. The Persian people are hungry for freedom.

With free democracies in the middle east...terrorism will wither on the vine.

Obama interfering or getting us involved in these protests in Iran would be a bad thing.

 

[Nik]

The voters in Iran want freedom and they are crying for a democracy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Very powerful!

Damn you Obama...this is your chance to change the face of the middle east. Bush did it with Iraq. Obama,...you could do it with Iran...without firing a shot. The Persian people are hungry for freedom.

With free democracies in the middle east...terrorism will wither on the vine.

Really? Exactly what goal could he accomplish without firing a shot, and how would he do it?

 

[Brn2bfree]

The voters in Iran want freedom and they are crying for a democracy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Very powerful!

Damn you Obama...this is your chance to change the face of the middle east. Bush did it with Iraq. Obama,...you could do it with Iran...without firing a shot. The Persian people are hungry for freedom.

With free democracies in the middle east...terrorism will wither on the vine.

Don't they have their own guns ?

You are joking right?

 

[caterpillar]

BULLSH*T. Some rioting nutjobs, almost certainly being clandestinely supported by foreign powers (we won't name names but I think we can guess) are trying to twart the will of the voters by pre-planned protests claiming about a "stolen" election (there's no evidence it was "stolen" by the way, where's the evidence??????).

When you can't win at the ballot box, take to the streets and lie that an election was "stolen" and try to overthrow the government.

 

[caterpillar]

Obama interfering or getting us involved in these protests in Iran would be a bad thing.

You really think the US is not orchestrating this in the first place? Maybe its Israel acting on its own?

There is no evidence that this election was "stolen" which makes it all the more clear that this "uprising" was pre-planned in advance prior to the election.

 

[Nik]

BULLSH*T. Some rioting nutjobs, almost certainly being clandestinely supported by foreign powers (we won't name names but I think we can guess) are trying to twart the will of the voters by pre-planned protests claiming about a "stolen" election (there's no evidence it was "stolen" by the way, where's the evidence??????).

When you can't win at the ballot box, take to the streets and lie that an election was "stolen" and try to overthrow the government.

What are you, an Ahmadinejad stooge?

Informed Comment: Stealing the Iranian Election

Evidence it was stolen is right there for you to peruse at your leisure.

 

[Dr Grump]

The voters in Iran want freedom and they are crying for a democracy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Very powerful!

Damn you Obama...this is your chance to change the face of the middle east. Bush did it with Iraq. Obama,...you could do it with Iran...without firing a shot. The Persian people are hungry for freedom.

With free democracies in the middle east...terrorism will wither on the vine.

Mind your own business America....

 

[Nik]

The voters in Iran want freedom and they are crying for a democracy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Very powerful!

Damn you Obama...this is your chance to change the face of the middle east. Bush did it with Iraq. Obama,...you could do it with Iran...without firing a shot. The Persian people are hungry for freedom.

With free democracies in the middle east...terrorism will wither on the vine.

Mind your own business America....

Why, exactly?

 

[dilloduck]

The voters in Iran want freedom and they are crying for a democracy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Very powerful!

Damn you Obama...this is your chance to change the face of the middle east. Bush did it with Iraq. Obama,...you could do it with Iran...without firing a shot. The Persian people are hungry for freedom.

With free democracies in the middle east...terrorism will wither on the vine.

Don't they have their own guns ?

You are joking right?

No--I'm not

 

[Brn2bfree]

The voters in Iran want freedom and they are crying for a democracy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Very powerful!

Damn you Obama...this is your chance to change the face of the middle east. Bush did it with Iraq. Obama,...you could do it with Iran...without firing a shot. The Persian people are hungry for freedom.

With free democracies in the middle east...terrorism will wither on the vine.

Really? Exactly what goal could he accomplish without firing a shot, and how would he do it?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PRESIDENT BUSH RENEWS SUPPORT FOR IRANIAN PEOPLE
Posted on 27 February 2006 by Stefania Lapenna


President Bush has once again renewed his moral support of the Iranian people and their aspirations to total freedom.

This time, it seems, he’ll do more than merely talking about freedom; he pledged economic aid to the Iranian freedom fighters and those who risk their life by taking to the streets against the regime.

It remains to be seen if these funds will be directed to genuine opposition groups rather than to ‘reformers’, who want to save a part of the regime.

Indeed, to be effective, the funds should be directed to those student,workers and women’s movements that don’t have a dark past and are seriously committed to democratic Regime Change with the ultimate goal of establishing a true democratic and secular gov’t, regardless of whether it will be a monarchy or a republic.

Overall, however, the President seems to get it (so far):

(…) The international community is also speaking with one voice to the radical regime in Tehran. Iran is a nation held hostage by a small clerical elite that is isolating and repressing its people, and denying them basic liberties and human rights. The Iranian regime sponsors terrorists and is actively working to expand its influence in the region. (…) as we confront Iran’s nuclear weapons ambitions, we’re also reaching out to the Iranian people to support their desire to be free; to build a free, democratic, and transparent society.

To support the Iranian people’s efforts to win their own freedom, my administration is requesting $75 million in emergency funds to support democracy in Iran. This is more than a fourfold increase over current levels of funding. These new funds will allow us to expand radio and television broadcasts into Iran (…) so Iranians can organize and challenge the repressive policies of the clerical regime(…) By supporting democratic change in Iran, we will hasten the day when the people of Iran can determine their own future and be free to choose their own leaders. Freedom in the Middle East requires freedom for the Iranian people, and America looks forward to the day when our nation can be the closest of friends with a free and democratic Iran.

 

[Dr Grump]

Why, exactly?

Because hte rest of the world are sick of you guys constantly poking your nose in where it's not wanted. Let countries sort out their own problems...If they ask for help, sure. But don't butt in:
1) Because America was based on freedom and therefore it looks hypocritical if you take sides
2) It just ain't none of your damn business...

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Obama interfering or getting us involved in these protests in Iran would be a bad thing.

You really think the US is not orchestrating this in the first place? Maybe its Israel acting on its own?

There is no evidence that this election was "stolen" which makes it all the more clear that this "uprising" was pre-planned in advance prior to the election.

No, I don't. The fact that there's so little difference between Moussavi and Ahmadinejad, especially in their opinion of the U.S., means that we really shouldn't care who wins. The fact that Ahmadinejad was declared the winner after only a few short hours of a paper ballot election is what has people upset.

 

[elvis]

Why, exactly?

Because hte rest of the world are sick of you guys constantly poking your nose in where it's not wanted. Let countries sort out their own problems...If they ask for help, sure. But don't butt in:
1) Because America was based on freedom and therefore it looks hypocritical if you take sides
2) It just ain't none of your damn business...

is that why you got rid of the obama picture in your sig?

 

[Nik]

Why, exactly?

Because hte rest of the world are sick of you guys constantly poking your nose in where it's not wanted. Let countries sort out their own problems...If they ask for help, sure. But don't butt in:

If who exactly asks for help?

1) Because America was based on freedom and therefore it looks hypocritical if you take sides

It looks hypocritical to take sides of revolutionaries fighting against an extremely oppressive regime, because america was based on freedom? That makes no sense at all.

2) It just ain't none of your damn business...

So Rwanda was just A OK, eh?

 

[oreo]

There is no proof that the election was stolen. That's the problem. Any news coming out is based on CONJECTURE--& some eroneous prior polling data. That's it.

For those of you wanting to invade Iran. I would sure hate to find out after the invasion that the election was correct. What did you forget about Iraq already?

The good news for you Bush haters--due to Bush we have Iran surrounded by democracies--Iran sits right between Iraq & Afganistan.

There is absolutely nothing we can do.

 

[Nik]

There is no proof that the election was stolen. That's the problem. Any news coming out is based on CONJECTURE--& some eroneous prior polling data. That's it.

For those of you wanting to invade Iran. I would sure hate to find out after the invasion that the election was correct. What did you forget about Iraq already?

There is absolutely nothing we can do.

Theres no proof, but there surely is a hell of a lot of evidence.

And I haven't seen anyone who has advocated invading Iran. But there actually are things we can do.

 

[oreo]

There is no proof that the election was stolen. That's the problem. Any news coming out is based on CONJECTURE--& some eroneous prior polling data. That's it.

For those of you wanting to invade Iran. I would sure hate to find out after the invasion that the election was correct. What did you forget about Iraq already?

There is absolutely nothing we can do.

Theres no proof, but there surely is a hell of a lot of evidence.

And I haven't seen anyone who has advocated invading Iran. But there actually are things we can do.

You're talking about covert actions. Hey--we've got the wrong President for any of that. I think any other President would have done that--but certainly not this one.

I have seen liberals calling for an invasion on other boards--& one on this board. These are the same people that hate Bush for doing the same thing in Iraq. "Liberating 50 million people in Iraq." The last election Sadam Husien held he won by 100% of the vote--so we knew something was up with that.

 

[Nik]

There is no proof that the election was stolen. That's the problem. Any news coming out is based on CONJECTURE--& some eroneous prior polling data. That's it.

For those of you wanting to invade Iran. I would sure hate to find out after the invasion that the election was correct. What did you forget about Iraq already?

There is absolutely nothing we can do.

Theres no proof, but there surely is a hell of a lot of evidence.

And I haven't seen anyone who has advocated invading Iran. But there actually are things we can do.

You're talking about covert actions. Hey--we've got the wrong President for any of that. I think any other President would have done that--but certainly not this one.

Actually hes already done stuff. See the twitter example.

I have seen liberals calling for an invasion on other boards--& one on this board. These are the same people that hate Bush for doing the same thing in Iraq. "Liberating 50 million people in Iraq." The last election Sadam Husien held he won by 100% of the vote--so we knew something was up with that.

We know something is up here as well.