1. Unlike a lot of posters here, I don't spend 24/7 hanging out at USMB.
2. While I might check in for a minute or two in between tasks in real world, I don't always have the time to spare to read assorted non-accurate and uninformative links.
3. Now that I've been able to go through them, I don't speak or read Chinese so some of them aren't informative. I did notice the word "transgender" a few time in English in one link inserted within the Chinese text, so that creates a ...

4. I didn't see any clear statements or evidence about genitalia, and notice the frequent times he/she has been rejected and disallowed in competitions so that adds to suspicions about honesty and accuracy of your links.
5. The last three paragraphs in your post are copy-paste lifted out of one of the sources you linked, yet you didn't place in quote marks or cite that they were such. i.e. you appear to be faking them as your words - typical of Leftist liars and disinformationists.
6. Like the rest of the sane and real world, I reject the concept of gender being allowed to over-rule sex in these matters. Is there a penis or vagina is what should be the determinant, not the "Orwellian" doublespeak of "gender" being separate from and based up physical trait like actual, natural sexual organ.
7. It's my understanding that professional boxing has weight/size categories and in this case it looks like a light-weight was pitted against a medium-weight so once again I'm disappointed with modern (DEI) IOC.
8. I don't comply with demands for response unless I'm being paid to do so and the check has cleared the bank.
9. Usually, blatant nonsense isn't worth wasting time to respond to. I've made an exception here, but don't expect it to be regular.