The Vibe Shifts Against the Right

You're still stuck at the exact same spot.
"....or any invasion or predatory incursion is perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government...."
There's no foreign nation or government to apply Title 50 to.
Title 50 doesn't recognize gangs as either foreign nations or government. Nor does any US statute. Trump's proclamation doesn't even attempt to classify them as such. So which foreign nation or government are you referring to? Be specific.
You just don't get it. Read Trump's proclamation. He obviously doesn't need any more justification than that. If you disagree take it up with the supremes. Otherwise ICE will carry out Trump's directive, period, full stop.
 
"The Vibe"? Is that the best the NYT can do while democrats are in complete disarray?
Is that the best you can do while the prez you voted for is in open defiance of the SC?
 
He obviously doesn't need any more justification than that. If you disagree take it up with the supremes.
You may have missed the ruling by the Supremes in which it said due process is required before any more illegal immigrants are deported under the guise of the AEA.
 
"I'd like to include them in the group of people to get them out of the country, but you'll have to be looking at the laws on that," Trump added.
How convenient that you just choose to disregard the piece that I highlighted above from your post. More disingenuous BS from you. Never in the history of the country has the judiciary been so politicized as what you, the democrats and Biden did in the past four years. Whine all you want, you're worse at taking AMERICAN rights away then Trump could ever be. You advocate for foreign invaders.
 
You may have missed the ruling by the Supremes in which it said due process is required before any more illegal immigrants are deported under the guise of the AEA.
Five day hold until the SCOTUS reviews it. Try being truthful for a change. I know it isn't part of the democrat way, but try anyway.
 
Rioting, assaulting police officers, destruction of property, and for some, seditious conspiracy.
The precedent was set by the democrats in the summer of 2020. Have you noticed how they have dug into their bag of tricks again with the two attempted assassinations of a candidate for POTUS or the violence they have brought against Musk, Tesla and their owners? Difference this time is the democrats don't control the DOJ. These criminals are being held accountable. Whine some more.
 
Your willful ignorance isn't an argument. Its an excuse for one. Exactly as predicted, you ignored the very source you asked for.

You don't care about links. You don't care about the facts in the case. You don't care that these 180 people were sent to prison despite NO conviction to any crime.

Its perfectly reasonable to you that these people should have no rights. That they should be imprisoned indefinitely in foreign gulags for NO crime, with NO hearing.

Because......you're a collaborator. And convincing people like you that 'they' have no rights to defend is the first thing authoritarians do.

Plenty of them have probably been in front of a judge already, as has the guy in Maryland. Again the lack of details allows you to basically make up any claims you wish.
 
Nathan Cofnas, a right-wing philosophy professor and self-described “race realist” fixated on group differences in I.Q., wrote on X, “All over the world, almost everyone with more than half a brain is looking at the disaster of Trump (along with Putin, Yoon Suk Yeol, et al.) and drawing the very reasonable conclusion that right-wing, anti-woke parties are incapable of effective governance.” (Yoon Suk Yeol is South Korea’s recently impeached president.)

Scott Siskind, who blogs under the pseudonym Scott Alexander, has been an influential figure in Silicon Valley’s revolt against social justice ideology, though he’s never been a Trump supporter. Last week, he asked whether “edgy heterodox centrists” like himself paved the way for Trump by opening the door to once-verboten arguments. In an imaginary Socratic dialogue, he wrote, “We wanted a swift, lean government that stopped strangling innovation and infrastructure. Instead we got chain-saw-style firings, total devastation of state capacity in exactly the way most likely to strangle innovation more than ever, and the worst and dumbest people in the world gloating about how they solved the ‘grift’ of sending lifesaving medications to dying babies.”


Anecdotal? Yes. A sign of disenchantment from elements on the Right's fringe? Yes.

More importantly, in the grand scheme their observations are correct.
Sheesh, you clowns are desperate.
 
You may have missed the ruling by the Supremes in which it said due process is required before any more illegal immigrants are deported under the guise of the AEA.
The USSC also said that the case was filed in the wrong district, and that the district judges cannot infringe on presidential authority. So that ruling was conflicted trying to avoid giving anyone a win.
Also, "due process" is a hearing, so illegals get a hearing date 10-years or more in the future, and then get immediately deported as per "Remain in Mexico" which is current law.
 
Nathan Cofnas, a right-wing philosophy professor and self-described “race realist” fixated on group differences in I.Q., wrote on X, “All over the world, almost everyone with more than half a brain is looking at the disaster of Trump (along with Putin, Yoon Suk Yeol, et al.) and drawing the very reasonable conclusion that right-wing, anti-woke parties are incapable of effective governance.” (Yoon Suk Yeol is South Korea’s recently impeached president.)

Scott Siskind, who blogs under the pseudonym Scott Alexander, has been an influential figure in Silicon Valley’s revolt against social justice ideology, though he’s never been a Trump supporter. Last week, he asked whether “edgy heterodox centrists” like himself paved the way for Trump by opening the door to once-verboten arguments. In an imaginary Socratic dialogue, he wrote, “We wanted a swift, lean government that stopped strangling innovation and infrastructure. Instead we got chain-saw-style firings, total devastation of state capacity in exactly the way most likely to strangle innovation more than ever, and the worst and dumbest people in the world gloating about how they solved the ‘grift’ of sending lifesaving medications to dying babies.”


Anecdotal? Yes. A sign of disenchantment from elements on the Right's fringe? Yes.

More importantly, in the grand scheme their observations are correct.
Achooo! sorry I am allergic to bullshit
 
Back
Top Bottom