No, that's not my argument at all.
Which, by the way, I stated pretty clearly in the same post you quoted.
I just think both sides should be examined.
You probably don't even realize that you are babbling.
Both sides of WHAT should be "examined?"
What "side" is there other than that any sovereign has the absolute right to protect its own borders and limit access of others into it upon such terms and conditions as to the sovereign shall seem most prudent?
If I want to wander across some other nation's fucking border without their ok, do you imagine I won't get my ass arrested?
"Oh gee. Come right on in. Ignore our laws. Just feel right at home."
Yeah.
Jesus fucking Christ, can you read?
I'm NOT arguing for amnesty. I'm NOT supporting illegal immigration.
Actions have consequences, that's all I was trying to explore. Not every post on this board is a statement - I'm asking a question.
You zealots are some damn insecure.
You communicate just as clearly as my asshole speaks French.
You aren't "exploring" jack or shit.
You are making contentions and are simply too waffling to admit what it is you are contending.
We all know, already, that actions have consequences. So what?
If a valid law is already on the books, what the fuck is wrong with trying to get it enforced?
A valid law (immigration restrictions and terms and conditions) is already on the books. It has not gotten properly enforced. Arizona has now made a stab in the right direction. Then you wade into the discussion and ask "have you folks considered the implications of what it would mean if we kicked out our illegal population?"
Yeah yeah. Actions have consequences. But what is the ALTERNATIVE? I answered your "exploratory" little "question" with a question of my own. And you wailed and bleated.
I don't give a FUCK that doing the right thing might have consequences. Can YOU fucking read? That is NOT a good reason not to do the right thing.
Why, if I am a cop and I enforce the stop sign law at the corner of Main and Elm and the damn mayor drives through that stop sign without stopping, it might have unexpected consequences if I pull him over and cite him for that traffic violation. And? Is that a good reason not to enforce the law?
Last edited: