Well, this goes back to my OP. Look at all the cultural issues that you and I agree have been bad ideas from the Left. From the Left's perspective, those tactics have been a response to actions and behaviors it sees from the Right. And yes, the Right has had things to answer for. So the Left raised the stakes, intensified the game.
In response, the Right has done exactly the same thing. From its perspective, its tactics are a response to what the Left has been doing. The election of Trump in 2016 is the shining example of that. He's the bull in the china shop the Right wanted to express their anger and frustration over the direction in which the country was going.
So as the two ends (not "sides", but "ends") of the spectrum are pulling further and further apart from the other, they are taking the rest of the country along with them. We're seeing an abject breakdown in the things that I personally think are key to maintaining America's global edge: Communication, collaboration, and innovation.
This is a classic self-inflicted wound, and neither end appears to care.
Oh, sure. I can absolutely understand the Left's response to Donald Trump. (I actually supported Hillary in 2016, for fear Trump would get us into WWIII. And I lost a hundred dollars betting he would lose -- it went to a
sede vacante ultra-Catholic anti-abortionist.)
But Trump proved not to be a new Cold Warrior. So now, my position is, to quote Mr Rumsfeld, you go to war with the Army you've got.
Any believer in the Rule of Law still has reason to worry about Trump, in the context of what's happening in America, but that's another argument, and, really, one that should take place among us rightwingers, behind closed doors.
And that's why 'neither side appears to care'.
You and I can be civil towards each other. Hell, during the Second World War, Churchill, in the House of Commons, paid a nice compliment to Erwin Rommel, saying that British difficulties in the war in North Africa were due, among other things to the fact that they were facing, as he said, 'across the havoc of war, a great general'.
But the fact is, we are in a develping cold civil war, and that naturally breeds hatred of the other side. It's probably an evolutionary survival strategy to demonize the other side, suppressing our natural pity for our fellow creatures, so we fight better.
A good guy to read on the contemporary American Right vs Left thing is Jonathan Haidt, a social psychologist.
[
Jonathan Haidt - Wikipedia ]
The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion (2012)
[
The Righteous Mind - Wikipedia ]
The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure (2018),
[
The Coddling of the American Mind - Wikipedia ]. (This last book is especially recommended -- it's a more extended version of that socialist woman's analysis of the 'me generation' and why it has gone 'woke'.)
One other point: it's psychologically comforting to think that the
worst of your political adversaries is typical of
all of them. Again, it helps you fight them.
But it's not true. (I had en encounter with a really nasty piece of work on your side the other day, someone who is a conscious, cool deliberate liar, and felt it was necessary to remind my side that there are many honest, decent people on the Left. Life would actually be easier for us if your side was made up exclusively of rotters. But it's not.)