progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 67,847
- 42,662
- 2,615
if you say so,,No, that tiny little system would take approximately 2 months to charge an EV.
It's called math.
Learn some.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
if you say so,,No, that tiny little system would take approximately 2 months to charge an EV.
It's called math.
Learn some.
When did you cross to the dark side?if you say so,,
did you calculate my usage??And it will take months to charge. Do some calculations to see just how silly your plan is.
Free! Can’t use it , but free!! Hahahaif you say so,,
Dude, it’s math, you said 300 watts, math is p= I x Vdid you calculate my usage??
youre leaving out a lot,,Dude, it’s math, you said 300 watts, math is p= I x V
Your 300 watts is 2 amps dummass. It takes 13 amps to vacuum a fking floor! Fk
Explain for usyoure leaving out a lot,,
so you want me to believe you,, some asshole on the internet thats edited my comments out of context and played stupid word games and admitted he hates EVs,, or a well known guy in the business thats actually done it and posted the proof,,,Explain for us
Naw, hereso you want me to believe you,, some asshole on the internet thats edited my comments out of context and played stupid word games and admitted he hates EVs,, or a well known guy in the business thats actually done it and posted the proof,,,
guess which one I believe
always and forever,,progressive hunter , still free?
EV's in various forms have been around for a very long time and they haven't become more affordable, practical, desirable yet.they will get cheaper,, you can find some smaller ones under 25K
No it is not free electricity. Eventually, the Solar cells will need to be replaced. Those solar cells are not going to be free.I still understand what you said. If your solar system has generated enough money to cover what you paid for it by not having to pay the electric company for that power, it has paid for itself, and anything generated by that system afterwards is basically free electricity.
of course they have,, the range has increased the quality and reliability has increased,, and not all of them are 70K,, you can get some under 25KEV's in various forms have been around for a very long time and they haven't become more affordable, practical, desirable yet.
So someone who keeps a vehicle over 10 years is a wacko? I ran my '96 Grand Cherokee for 22 years and to 340,000 miles before junking it.I see little that is rational in this thread. Maybe it's just me.
The reason why the Tesla Model Y had the highest unit sales in the world for the first five months of this calendar year is because FOR MOST PEOPLE, the car combines comfort, features, performance, utility, and cost efficiency better than any other vehicle. I personally think it looks sort of dumpy, but I personally don't give a shit what my vehicle looks like.
FOR MOST PEOPLE, paying for the energy to propel that beast would be about 25% of the cost for a comparable ICE vehicle. This is because essentially all charging would be AT HOME, during overnight hours when the electric rate is lowest. MOST PEOPLE would be intelligent enough to use a charging protocol that both maximizes efficiency and maximizes battery life.
The batteries and motors on such cars will essentially last forever, if properly cared for. Even if you are one of those wacko's who keeps his car for ten years plus, by the time the battery needs replacement, you will be able to get it done at Pep Boys for three or four grand.
It's possible to imagine scenarios where an EV would be disadvantageous when compared to an ICE vehicle. Hell, with millions of them sold already, there are actual examples of people who have experienced nightmares with their EV's that simply would not have occurred if they had instead chose a fucking Toyota Corolla. WGAS?
And the U.S. government and some states use our hard earned tax money to give substantial tax credits--not deductions--to EV buyers as well as tax breaks for the manufactures. Just as with other forms of 'green energy', without those government subsidies, there would be little or no profit in providing that energy.of course they have,, the range has increased the quality and reliability has increased,, and not all of them are 70K,, you can get some under 25K
and if youre not a wasteful egotistical american you can get them under 10K
the problems with the government and the quality of an EV are two different things,,And the U.S. government and some states use our hard earned tax money to give substantial tax credits--not deductions--to EV buyers as well as tax breaks for the manufactures. Just as with other forms of 'green energy', without those government subsidies, there would be little or no profit in providing that energy.
The lifespan of an EV battery, however, is estimated at around 100,000 to 150,000 miles or about eight years so we'll see how it all shakes out as these batteries need to be replaced at an average cost of $5,000 to $15,000. All of a sudden the EV doesn't look like such a great deal.
Also the world supply of lithium, cobalt, manganese, copper etc. that goes into these EV batteries is even more finite than is petroleum and we are by no means energy independent in any of those elements. Which of course is why the cost of an average EV vehicle will remain high for a very long time.
As for affordability, I suppose most who can afford a new car could afford one of these:
![]()