XponentialChaos
Diamond Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 31,842
- 11,572
- 1,285
Epps, the only insurrectionist who lead the charge into the Capitol but was never charged....interesting
Which law did he break? Post the statute.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Epps, the only insurrectionist who lead the charge into the Capitol but was never charged....interesting
that's rich, you calling someone dishonest.....Look buddy, you tell me, what are you doing if you "push back" against someone who you think is saying something wrong...Easy, it's defending....Case closed troll...Not necessarily what you think. And you put words he didn't say in quotes as though he said them. Quite dishonest. Now you're making up excuses for why you did that.
I see you have nothing to say about Epps, huh.It's laughable because no matter how you denigrate those who oppose your ideology, we have come to learn that what ever it is that you people insist about "the right" is exactly what you are, or are doing....You've collectively trashed civility, trashed law and order, corrupted the government, including the judiciary, and are hell bent on destroying this country....
Is that good enough for you?
Then I would assume you'll be calling for the immediate release of those who entered the capitol....Which law did he break? Post the statute.
I've said what I think he is....The rest is just laughing at you guy's defending a MAGA guy, former Oath Keeper....Now that's some funny shit...I see you have nothing to say about Epps, huh.
Take off, hoser.
Even many normal Trump supporters don't want to admit there is a significant, loud and relatively powerful component of their movement that is a radical fringe.Why do they need a scapegoat if it was just a radical fringe that doesn't represent them at all? Or were all Trump supporters there labeled the same way and called insurrectionists by people like you, every democrat in office, and every mainstream media outlet? Which made them feel like they did need a scapegoat?
Sometimes it's easy, sometimes it isn't. I have no idea what percentage of Trump supporters are cultists. I believe they're quite overrepresented on this board.Oh, so you can easily tell when a Trump supporter is a cultist or not? What percentage of Trump supporters are cultists?
Sometimes yeah. If they agree with me that the sky is blue, then that's a good sign. Don't you think?ie: whether they agree with you eh?
that's rich, you calling someone dishonest.....Look buddy, you tell me, what are you doing if you "push back" against someone who you think is saying something wrong...Easy, it's defending....Case closed troll...
Then I would assume you'll be calling for the immediate release of those who entered the capitol....
Conceit is something you don't lack....Sometimes yeah. If they agree with me that the sky is blue, then that's a good sign. Don't you think?
I really don't have a problem with that....Being in the Capitol is a misdemeanor, now assaulting Cops? That's a different story, and I don't support that...So, seperate them, and if they are still being held going on two and a half years, then let them go if they only committed a misdemeanor, they other ones? Hell, throw the book at them.....Fair enough?Why? Anyone who went into the Capitol and/or assaulted police should be so charged.
And the only dude wearing a red hat on that day, whom you moonbats will defend to your deaths.
-----------------------------------------------Way to stop at the comma, and change the entire meaning of what I said, asshole.
What a profoud.....er', I mean pretentious post, as usual.-----------------------------------------------
I demur.
If you wanted Epps to be the subject of your sentence.....then maybe you should have used "who". Instead of 'whom'.
YOU....wrote a confusing sentence.
I merely attempted to add context.
You can try this next time: Epps is the only dude in a red hat who you will defend'.
But, to give you your due, you may be right in pointing out the lack of defenders within the responsible American cohort.
So, though you got to it rather obliquely, you are right in that no patriotic American is going to defend those other insurrectionists who were wearing red MAGA hats.
At the end of the day, if you are offended by that, or my shiny pictures, that is regrettable.
But, moving beyond your concerns over who was wearing a red MAGA hat on January 6th, those photos and many more, amply illustrate that the January 6th insurrectionists, seditionists, violent attackers were majorly MAGA RWNJ.
Or alternatively, as has been frequently posited on this venue ---they were Zionist cross-dressing Queens who were doing a false-flag thingy so that blame for all those attacks and injuries to the uniformed police would be blamed on Don Trump.
I really don't have a problem with that....Being in the Capitol is a misdemeanor, now assaulting Cops? That's a different story, and I don't support that...So, seperate them, and if they are still being held going on two and a half years, then let them go if they only committed a misdemeanor, they other ones? Hell, throw the book at them.....Fair enough?
Sweetie…there is no such thing as “Breaking and Entering peacefully”.PEACEFULLY!!! He stressed it over and over. They were going to the Capital “peaceful”. It was going to be a “peaceful demonstration”.
President Trump didn’t say “break into the Capitol building”. It’s 100% legal to say “protest at place X or place Y”.President Trump said "Peacefully too, and you people won't accept it....
Sweetie…there is no such thing as “Breaking and Entering peacefully”.
There is no such thing as “Trespassing peacefully”.
Those are both crimes whether you do them “peacefully” or not - and he encouraged a mob to commit those crimes over and over and over.
The kind of comment a devout fascist with a virtue signaling Ukraine flag in their profile, would makeIf only a quarter of the MAGrats