The Trump Warrant Had No Legal Basis

[Billy_Bob]

Wow, could you imagine if what you posted really happened?

Your blob actually hired that many convicted felons.

Wow... Could you Imagin if you had a brain or even one cognitive thought? Me Neither...

 

[candycorn]

Wow... Could you Imagin if you had a brain or even one cognitive thought? Me Neither...

When you got nothing.... Attack the source or the person.... Alinsky's rules for radicals... Good little commie.

 

[Quasar44]

The Trump Warrant Had No Legal Basis​

A former president’s rights under the Presidential Records Act trump the statutes the FBI cited to justify the Mar-a-Lago raid.​

Opinion | The Trump Warrant Had No Legal Basis

A former president’s rights under the Presidential Records Act trump the statutes the FBI cited to justify the Mar-a-Lago raid.

www.wsj.com

22 Aug 2022 ~~ By David B. Rivkin Jr. & Lee A. Casey

(Excerpt) ->
Was the Federal Bureau of Investigation justified in searching Donald Trump’s residence at Mar-a-Lago? The judge who issued the warrant for Mar-a-Lago has signaled that he is likely to release a redacted version of the affidavit supporting it. But the warrant itself suggests the answer is likely no—the FBI had no legally valid cause for the raid.
The warrant authorized the FBI to seize “all physical documents and records constituting evidence, contraband, fruits of crime, or other items illegally possessed in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§793, 2071, or 1519” (emphasis added). These three criminal statutes all address the possession and handling of materials that contain national-security information, public records or material relevant to an investigation or other matters properly before a federal agency or the courts.
The materials to be seized included “any government and/or Presidential Records created between January 20, 2017, and January 20, 2021”—i.e., during Mr. Trump’s term of office. Virtually all the materials at Mar-a-Lago are likely to fall within this category. Federal law gives Mr. Trump a right of access to them. His possession of them is entirely consistent with that right, and therefore lawful, regardless of the statutes the FBI cites in its warrant.
The materials to be seized included “any government and/or Presidential Records created between January 20, 2017, and January 20, 2021”—i.e., during Mr. Trump’s term of office. Virtually all the materials at Mar-a-Lago are likely to fall within this category. Federal law gives Mr. Trump a right of access to them. His possession of them is entirely consistent with that right, and therefore lawful, regardless of the statutes the FBI cites in its warrant.
Those statutes are general in their text and application. But Mr. Trump’s documents are covered by a specific statute, the Presidential Records Act of 1978. It has long been the Supreme Court position, as stated in Morton v. Mancari (1974), that “where there is no clear intention otherwise, a specific statute will not be controlled or nullified by a general one, regardless of the priority of enactment.” The former president’s rights under the PRA trump any application of the laws the FBI warrant cites.

Commentary:
The overreach of both Garland and Wray is astounding.
If this were done by the DOJ during the Trump administration to Obama, or VP Joe Biden this would have been reversed long ago. Instead, this is going to be milked through the midterms.
It has in effect hurt the DOJ, Merrick Garland, the FBI, Christpher Wray, Democrats overall, and especially Joe Biden.
Well, we do know that unlike Bill Clinton the Nuke Codes were not lost, nor did DJT abscond with $28,000 worth of White House furniture neither did he leave with over 3 million documents as Obama did
Obviously, the Maoist Democrats in power have gone from being merely lawless to conceiving that their interests are the very bounds in which all law must operate.
It's become that using the word ‘legal’ with anything involving Democrats produces nothing.
For them, there are no rules, regulations, laws or statutes. All of those terms are for ‘others.’

Grave violation of the 4th amendment and massive abuse of power that is unprecedented in US history

 

[BackAgain]

Post 42 is just as retarded as post 24. For good reason.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Grave violation of the 4th amendment and massive abuse of power that is unprecedented in US history

Funny, that is one of the claims Trumps Attorneys made to the appellate court today... How Odd....

 

[Billy_Bob]

WOW... Omit the garbage I was replying too... Your just as deceptive as the rest of the dimtards...

 

[Quasar44]

Funny, that is one of the claims Trumps Attorneys made to the appellate court today... How Odd....

What you “little Eichmanns “ really fear is you will lose the Congress and be investigated and put in prison

 

[Quasar44]

Little Eichmanns is todays Demonrat party

 

[Billy_Bob]

What you “little Eichmanns “ really fear is you will lose the Congress and be investigated and put in prison

You misinterpret me... Dems will lose that congress. Along with the Senate... that is a good thing. I am agreeing with you in my comments.

 

[Quasar44]

You misinterpret me... Dems will lose that congress. Along with the Senate... that is a good thing. I am agreeing with you in my comments.

Don’t be so sure !!
As Stalin said ..” it’s who counts the votes “

 

[Quasar44]

All little Jewish Goebbels half men

 

[Billy_Bob]

Don’t be so sure !!
As Stalin said ..” it’s who counts the votes “

Or stuffs the ballot box making the count that is counted....

 

[Quasar44]

Or stuffs the ballot box making the count that is counted....

Never could I ever imagined the USA could transform into a 1984 fascist state so quickly

 

[Penelope]

The Trump Warrant Had No Legal Basis​

A former president’s rights under the Presidential Records Act trump the statutes the FBI cited to justify the Mar-a-Lago raid.​

Opinion | The Trump Warrant Had No Legal Basis

A former president’s rights under the Presidential Records Act trump the statutes the FBI cited to justify the Mar-a-Lago raid.

www.wsj.com

22 Aug 2022 ~~ By David B. Rivkin Jr. & Lee A. Casey

(Excerpt) ->
Was the Federal Bureau of Investigation justified in searching Donald Trump’s residence at Mar-a-Lago? The judge who issued the warrant for Mar-a-Lago has signaled that he is likely to release a redacted version of the affidavit supporting it. But the warrant itself suggests the answer is likely no—the FBI had no legally valid cause for the raid.
The warrant authorized the FBI to seize “all physical documents and records constituting evidence, contraband, fruits of crime, or other items illegally possessed in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§793, 2071, or 1519” (emphasis added). These three criminal statutes all address the possession and handling of materials that contain national-security information, public records or material relevant to an investigation or other matters properly before a federal agency or the courts.
The materials to be seized included “any government and/or Presidential Records created between January 20, 2017, and January 20, 2021”—i.e., during Mr. Trump’s term of office. Virtually all the materials at Mar-a-Lago are likely to fall within this category. Federal law gives Mr. Trump a right of access to them. His possession of them is entirely consistent with that right, and therefore lawful, regardless of the statutes the FBI cites in its warrant.
The materials to be seized included “any government and/or Presidential Records created between January 20, 2017, and January 20, 2021”—i.e., during Mr. Trump’s term of office. Virtually all the materials at Mar-a-Lago are likely to fall within this category. Federal law gives Mr. Trump a right of access to them. His possession of them is entirely consistent with that right, and therefore lawful, regardless of the statutes the FBI cites in its warrant.
Those statutes are general in their text and application. But Mr. Trump’s documents are covered by a specific statute, the Presidential Records Act of 1978. It has long been the Supreme Court position, as stated in Morton v. Mancari (1974), that “where there is no clear intention otherwise, a specific statute will not be controlled or nullified by a general one, regardless of the priority of enactment.” The former president’s rights under the PRA trump any application of the laws the FBI warrant cites.

Commentary:
The overreach of both Garland and Wray is astounding.
If this were done by the DOJ during the Trump administration to Obama, or VP Joe Biden this would have been reversed long ago. Instead, this is going to be milked through the midterms.
It has in effect hurt the DOJ, Merrick Garland, the FBI, Christpher Wray, Democrats overall, and especially Joe Biden.
Well, we do know that unlike Bill Clinton the Nuke Codes were not lost, nor did DJT abscond with $28,000 worth of White House furniture neither did he leave with over 3 million documents as Obama did
Obviously, the Maoist Democrats in power have gone from being merely lawless to conceiving that their interests are the very bounds in which all law must operate.
It's become that using the word ‘legal’ with anything involving Democrats produces nothing.
For them, there are no rules, regulations, laws or statutes. All of those terms are for ‘others.’

it was signed by a judge, do you want everyone to not have a FBI search and seizure. Tramp is not above the law.

 

[Curried Goats]

What you “little Eichmanns “ really fear is you will lose the Congress and be investigated and put in prison

Congress isn't law enforcement, they don't put people in prison. That's the FBI snd DOJ. You don't have the good sense to know how the government works and therefore all the imagined fear you instill in Democrats is just another aspect of your cosplaying fantasy.

 

[Penelope]

President Trump isn't going after people to break their backs, just that justice is served against those who kicked the Constitution under the bus after signing papers saying they would uphold the Constitution. Don't let his hot-under-the-collar stuff fool you. The man has a plan, and I support Donald Trump the Presbyterian because he has what it takes to get America out of the filthy commie claws of Nancy and her phew squad..

You would support the former Pres. tramp.

 

[Penelope]

Little Eichmanns is todays Demonrat party

its the republicans that want to do away with freedom and democracy.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

WTF does that have to do with Trump not being on any campaign for office?

Do you always make stupid, irrelevant "points" and strut around thinking your dumbfuckery is clever?

Of course Trump is not CURRENTLY on a POTUS election ballot. Nobody is.

 

[Moonglow]

Do you always make stupid, irrelevant "points" and strut around thinking your dumbfuckery is clever?

Of course Trump is not CURRENTLY on a POTUS election ballot. Nobody is.

If I have to tell you that then you have reading comprehension problems.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

If I have to tell you that then you have reading comprehension problems.

You have general comprehension problems.