The Trump administration just ate its own with Michael Flynn

FBI's top lawyer ousted amid criticism for role in Flynn investigation One must ask, how can an administration be this stupid by exposing their own dishonesty with Michael Flynn, while their own AG calls for dismissing the charges against Flynn? And the newly released transcripts by Trumps own National Intelligence director John Ratcliffe, which exposes Flynn for doing exactly what the FBI claimed he was doing, and revealing Trump and Pence letting Flynn go for lying. So what is there to defend? Lol! Nothing! Barr and Ratcliffe cut their own legs off by releasing the transcripts and verifying that what the Obama administration did was spot on, while proving Flynn did in fact have conversations with Kislyak over sanctions, and later Flynn lied about those conversations. Trump is desperate to get Flynn off, and they themselves just exposed the criminality by Flynn.

Flynn was blackmailed you say? For what? Nothing! Flynn did this, not the FBI. They did their job. And what does the the Trump administration do in its desperation? It fires the career lawyer for the FBI. What a bunch of low life's. This country has gone straight to hell with Trumps corruption.
Lol. So it is completely fine for police to set you up?
How is revealing the truth a set up?

What CRIME was the FBI investigating when McCabe called him to set up "an informal meeting" just 2 hours later? You HAVE no answer for this --- do you?????
If the FBI intercepted communications between Flynn and Kislyak behind the back of a sitting president, it is the FBI's job to investigate. Is it not? Remember, Flynn had no government role.

That same original FBI team wanted to close the case on it, not fining anything illegal.

You are so ignorant.
You come here thinking you have weight to throw around, and yet, you produce no documentation. Just your own made up beliefs in your head. Start producing relevant information. You are responding foolishly with nothing.

This whole "phony outrage" thread is just a failure of you to THINK FOR YOURSELF and not be led by the nose by Don Da Lemon or R. Madcow.. There is NO "eating of their own" here... Just another opportunity for YOU to show how ignorant you are of the FACTS and EVIDENCE and demand that folks "educate you"....
FBI's top lawyer ousted amid criticism for role in Flynn investigation One must ask, how can an administration be this stupid by exposing their own dishonesty with Michael Flynn, while their own AG calls for dismissing the charges against Flynn? And the newly released transcripts by Trumps own National Intelligence director John Ratcliffe, which exposes Flynn for doing exactly what the FBI claimed he was doing, and revealing Trump and Pence letting Flynn go for lying. So what is there to defend? Lol! Nothing! Barr and Ratcliffe cut their own legs off by releasing the transcripts and verifying that what the Obama administration did was spot on, while proving Flynn did in fact have conversations with Kislyak over sanctions, and later Flynn lied about those conversations. Trump is desperate to get Flynn off, and they themselves just exposed the criminality by Flynn.

Flynn was blackmailed you say? For what? Nothing! Flynn did this, not the FBI. They did their job. And what does the the Trump administration do in its desperation? It fires the career lawyer for the FBI. What a bunch of low life's. This country has gone straight to hell with Trumps corruption.
Lol. So it is completely fine for police to set you up?
How is revealing the truth a set up?

What CRIME was the FBI investigating when McCabe called him to set up "an informal meeting" just 2 hours later? You HAVE no answer for this --- do you?????
If the FBI intercepted communications between Flynn and Kislyak behind the back of a sitting president, it is the FBI's job to investigate. Is it not? Remember, Flynn had no government role.

ABSOLUTELY -- The INVESTIGATION was finished and CLOSED by FBI Intelligence.. Did you MISS the statement that they FOUND NO WRONGDOING by Flynn? But yet Comey, McCabe, Strzok DEMANDED the Intel Group at the FBI KEEP IT OPEN???

No way you would have missed this if you weren't HAPPY getting fed shit by MSNBC.. Because the story appeared in the WASHPO just ONE DAY before Comey/McCabe set up the ambush at the WH that COMEY LATER publicly BRAGGED about "being an ambush"..

Read this -- tell me WHAT CRIME was the FBI STILL INVESTIGATING after MONTHS of an Intel Div operation that PRODUCED NO CRIMES????


By Ellen Nakashima and
Greg MillerJanuary 23, 2017
The FBI in late December reviewed intercepts of communications between the Russian ambassador to the United States and retired Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn — national security adviser to then-President-elect Trump — but has not found any evidence of wrongdoing or illicit ties to the Russian government, U.S. officials said

Although Flynn’s contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak were listened to, Flynn himself is not the active target of an investigation, U.S. officials said. The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday that U.S. counterintelligence agents had investigated the communications between Flynn and Kislyak.

Although Flynn has written critically about Russia, he also was paid to deliver a speech at a 2015 Moscow gala for RT, the Kremlin-sponsored international television station, at which he was seated next to Putin.

The FBI’s counterintelligence agents listen to calls all the time that do not pertain to any open investigation, current and former law enforcement officials said. Often, said one former official, “they’re just monitoring the other [foreign official] side of the call.”


Both Flynn, a former head of the Pentagon’s intelligence agency, and Kislyak, a seasoned diplomat, are probably aware that Kislyak’s phone calls and texts are being monitored, current and former officials said. That would make it highly unlikely, the individuals said, that the men would allow their calls to be conduits of illegal coordination.
You still don't get it do you?

Neither one of these links are MSNBC. And I can provide you with more.




Transcripts of phone calls that played a pivotal role in the Russia investigation were declassified and released on Friday, showing that Michael Flynn, as an adviser to the then president-elect, Donald Trump, urged Russia’s ambassador to be “even-keeled” in response to punitive Obama administration measures. Is that what you call a transition role? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:

Asking the Russians NOT to retaliate and take an "even keel" is NOT discussing sanctions. First of all there are two kinds of sanctions.. The most important being the FINANCIAL sanctions that Obama levied on Russian Oligarchs and even Putin himself.. NONE of that was EVER discussed in the six calls.. Dont give a FUCK what a NYT headline says, they retract headlines almost DAILY.. Did so in fact today...

The 2nd type of sanctions are DIPLOMATIC SANCTIONS.. Where the US expelled a large fraction of the total Russian diplomatic corps.. NO ONE really wanted Russia to EXPEL more of OUR diplomats. So this was not CREATING policy in any meaningful way.. The FBI INTEL group had already determined that and ANNOUNCED IT the day before the Comey/McCabe/Strzok AMBUSH at the WH...

There WAS NO CRIME left to investigate.. Only hate and arrogance of high level FBI/CIA/DNI/Obama admin officials to "get Flynn" on SOMETHING...
 
The transcript revealed that in fact Flynn had conversations with Kislyak. Two, he then lied about hose conversations forcing Pence and Trump to get rid of Flynn.

Not a crime to talk with Kislyak.. Was his DUTY as incoming security chief on the Transistion Team.. Read the laws regarding Transistion Team privileges..
Nope! Wrong again. Get a clue. Flynn had no government position to discuss or make policy decisions behind the back of a sitting president. Flynn was setting policy, not transitioning. Big difference!

Not educating you here after too many years of being fed crap and liking it.., Go look up the FEDERAL LAWS created for Presidential Transistions.. Educate yourself before people just start ignoring you...
Transitions are not for setting policy. Why do you think Flynn lied about it? Dude, its simple horse sense logic. You look up the federal laws regarding people who are not government officials in a foreign policy setting who were committing treason. Boss, you lost this argument. And how do we know? Because no law exists for a non-government person to set foreign policy. Period! You show it to me hot shot. I can't show it because it doesn't exist.
 
The transcript revealed that in fact Flynn had conversations with Kislyak. Two, he then lied about hose conversations forcing Pence and Trump to get rid of Flynn.

Not a crime to talk with Kislyak.. Was his DUTY as incoming security chief on the Transistion Team.. Read the laws regarding Transistion Team privileges..
Nope! Wrong again. Get a clue. Flynn had no government position to discuss or make policy decisions behind the back of a sitting president. Flynn was setting policy, not transitioning. Big difference!

Not educating you here after too many years of being fed crap and liking it.., Go look up the FEDERAL LAWS created for Presidential Transistions.. Educate yourself before people just start ignoring you...
Transitions are not for setting policy. Why do you think Flynn lied about it? Dude, its simple horse sense logic. You look up the federal laws regarding people who are not government officials in a foreign policy setting who were committing treason. Boss, you lost this argument. And how do we know? Because no law exists for a non-government person to set foreign policy. Period! You show it to me hot shot. I can't show it because it doesn't exist.

What POLICY did Flynn discuss?? Did he OFFER the Russians any deal of value??? NO -- he did not.. MULTIPLE transcripts of the six calls reveal that and that is WHY the FBI INTEL group wanted to CLOSE the investigation and declare Flynn "cleared"...
 
The transcript revealed that in fact Flynn had conversations with Kislyak. Two, he then lied about hose conversations forcing Pence and Trump to get rid of Flynn.

Not a crime to talk with Kislyak.. Was his DUTY as incoming security chief on the Transistion Team.. Read the laws regarding Transistion Team privileges..
Nope! Wrong again. Get a clue. Flynn had no government position to discuss or make policy decisions behind the back of a sitting president. Flynn was setting policy, not transitioning. Big difference!

Not educating you here after too many years of being fed crap and liking it.., Go look up the FEDERAL LAWS created for Presidential Transistions.. Educate yourself before people just start ignoring you...
Transitions are not for setting policy. Why do you think Flynn lied about it? Dude, its simple horse sense logic. You look up the federal laws regarding people who are not government officials in a foreign policy setting who were committing treason. Boss, you lost this argument. And how do we know? Because no law exists for a non-government person to set foreign policy. Period! You show it to me hot shot. I can't show it because it doesn't exist.

Transitions are not for setting policy.

So what's the proper charge for his calls?

You look up the federal laws regarding people who are not government officials in a foreign policy setting who were committing treason.

Treason? You funny, bitch!

Because no law exists for a non-government person to set foreign policy. Period!

So there is no law against it?
 
The transcript revealed that in fact Flynn had conversations with Kislyak. Two, he then lied about hose conversations forcing Pence and Trump to get rid of Flynn.

Lying to Pence/Trump is NOT a crime.. And NOW both of those people realize they were fed really bad info about Flynn and back this dismissal of a "PROCESS" crime fully. Both Obama and Yates warned Trump that "Flynn couldn't be trusted".. Which is only because Obama HATED Flynn for standing up to him when he declared ISIS is dead..

There was no lie to the FBI.. The tapes of the Kislyak calls are out.. And it's clear that Flynn MADE NO DEALS with Russia regarding sanctions.. The ONLY thing discussed was that he URGED Russia "not to retaliate against the expulsion of diplomats... Don't think that runs COUNTER to the wishes of the US or EVEN the Obama Admin....
Lying to the FBI is a crime. Trump and Pence had a criminal working in the WH. And the transcripts reveal the truth, not bad info. Conversations between Flynn and Kislyak involving sanctions during an Obama presidency is treason. And the conversations were proven.

And Obama and Yates liking or not liking Flynn have nothing to do with the price of apples. Nor does Flynn and Kislyak not making a deal have anything to do with him conducting foreign policy. The man is a criminal. Next?

You lie over and over, you ignore the released FBI documents showing they conspired against Flynn, just as you ignore the released phone transcripts showing Flynn didn't do anything wrong.
There are no documents that exist that prove the FBI conspired against Flynn. There are only documents that exist proving the FBI did its job. The courts are trying to figure out how Flynn is not guilty, and they simply cannot do that.

Bwahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

Here are the documents you never accepted, they are from the FBI:

The Last Refuge

FBI Notes Released – Show Plan to Frame Michael Flynn For “Logan Act” Violation and/or “Lying” About It – With Goal For Removal…

Posted on April 29, 2020 by sundance

Excerpt:

The first of the sealed documents provided to the Flynn defense have been unsealed. The documents include emails between: FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, his FBI counsel Lisa Page, as well as FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI Agent Joe Pientka in the lead-up to the January 24, 2017 interview of Michael Flynn.
This specific release is the court filing of five pages that was initially turned-over to the Flynn defense team last Friday. [The pdf is here] [There are an additional 11 pages of documents from another production earlier today; those are not in this release]
The documents today also include handwritten notes taken by FBI counterintelligence chief William “Bill” Priestap; which show him both questioning and outlining the purpose of the interview: to remove National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.

According to the Priestap notes it appears the position of the FBI on January 23, 2017, was that Michael Flynn had violated the Logan Act by having a conversation with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak on December 29, 2016, prior to the inauguration.
This was a ridiculous position, there was no violation of the Logan Act; however, it was this position from which the questioning the next day, January 24 2017, would be based.
The next page of notes discusses the “Afterwards”:

The redactions are likely “the transcript“; where the FBI has the transcript of the call between Michael Flynn and Ambassador Kislyak. The redaction would be continued to protect the source of the material (“sources and methods”).


Interestingly, on the second day, the actual day of the interview, it appears Bill Priestap had second thoughts and was questioning the goal of the interview: “I thought about it last night and I believe we should rethink this”…

FBI Asst. Director for Counterintelligence Bill Priestap then asks the question: “what is our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?”
The premise of “wrongdoing” vis-a-vis a Logan Act violation was ridiculous. As the incoming National Security Advisor Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn would be talking to many counterparts throughout the globe. Even Priestap started to realize what they were doing was “playing games.”
Here’s the full release:

LINK

======

You going to deny them?

You are so bad at this, do you know what Sedition is?
So the whole premise of this so called framing of Flynn is predicated over a question? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: ,Dude, you have got to be kidding me? Get out of here with that ridiculous shit.

You are determined to ignore multiple documents that are right there in front of you, why are you trying so hard to ignore the evidence of conspiracy?

You suffer from a concussion or what?
Comments that have nothing to do with framing chief. Get a clue. There is nothing there in the English language that can be interpreted as framing someone. That's you and your fantasies doing that. Wake the hell, up.
 
The transcript revealed that in fact Flynn had conversations with Kislyak. Two, he then lied about hose conversations forcing Pence and Trump to get rid of Flynn.

Not a crime to talk with Kislyak.. Was his DUTY as incoming security chief on the Transistion Team.. Read the laws regarding Transistion Team privileges..
Nope! Wrong again. Get a clue. Flynn had no government position to discuss or make policy decisions behind the back of a sitting president. Flynn was setting policy, not transitioning. Big difference!

Not educating you here after too many years of being fed crap and liking it.., Go look up the FEDERAL LAWS created for Presidential Transistions.. Educate yourself before people just start ignoring you...
Transitions are not for setting policy. Why do you think Flynn lied about it? Dude, its simple horse sense logic. You look up the federal laws regarding people who are not government officials in a foreign policy setting who were committing treason. Boss, you lost this argument. And how do we know? Because no law exists for a non-government person to set foreign policy. Period! You show it to me hot shot. I can't show it because it doesn't exist.

When are you ever going to back up your claim on this, such a transition laws or...?

Otherwise everyone with a working brain are going to conclude you are trolling all over the place. You ignore posted links to laws, documents and FBI statements.

I wonder if you are paid to be this stupid here?
 
The transcript revealed that in fact Flynn had conversations with Kislyak. Two, he then lied about hose conversations forcing Pence and Trump to get rid of Flynn.

Not a crime to talk with Kislyak.. Was his DUTY as incoming security chief on the Transistion Team.. Read the laws regarding Transistion Team privileges..
Nope! Wrong again. Get a clue. Flynn had no government position to discuss or make policy decisions behind the back of a sitting president. Flynn was setting policy, not transitioning. Big difference!

Not educating you here after too many years of being fed crap and liking it.., Go look up the FEDERAL LAWS created for Presidential Transistions.. Educate yourself before people just start ignoring you...
Transitions are not for setting policy. Why do you think Flynn lied about it? Dude, its simple horse sense logic. You look up the federal laws regarding people who are not government officials in a foreign policy setting who were committing treason. Boss, you lost this argument. And how do we know? Because no law exists for a non-government person to set foreign policy. Period! You show it to me hot shot. I can't show it because it doesn't exist.

What POLICY did Flynn discuss?? Did he OFFER the Russians any deal of value??? NO -- he did not.. MULTIPLE transcripts of the six calls reveal that and that is WHY the FBI INTEL group wanted to CLOSE the investigation and declare Flynn "cleared"...
OMG! Dude, you were given at least four links. And yes, if you had read the correspondence, Flynn was offering something of value. Read man read.
 
The transcript revealed that in fact Flynn had conversations with Kislyak. Two, he then lied about hose conversations forcing Pence and Trump to get rid of Flynn.

Lying to Pence/Trump is NOT a crime.. And NOW both of those people realize they were fed really bad info about Flynn and back this dismissal of a "PROCESS" crime fully. Both Obama and Yates warned Trump that "Flynn couldn't be trusted".. Which is only because Obama HATED Flynn for standing up to him when he declared ISIS is dead..

There was no lie to the FBI.. The tapes of the Kislyak calls are out.. And it's clear that Flynn MADE NO DEALS with Russia regarding sanctions.. The ONLY thing discussed was that he URGED Russia "not to retaliate against the expulsion of diplomats... Don't think that runs COUNTER to the wishes of the US or EVEN the Obama Admin....
Lying to the FBI is a crime. Trump and Pence had a criminal working in the WH. And the transcripts reveal the truth, not bad info. Conversations between Flynn and Kislyak involving sanctions during an Obama presidency is treason. And the conversations were proven.

And Obama and Yates liking or not liking Flynn have nothing to do with the price of apples. Nor does Flynn and Kislyak not making a deal have anything to do with him conducting foreign policy. The man is a criminal. Next?

You lie over and over, you ignore the released FBI documents showing they conspired against Flynn, just as you ignore the released phone transcripts showing Flynn didn't do anything wrong.
There are no documents that exist that prove the FBI conspired against Flynn. There are only documents that exist proving the FBI did its job. The courts are trying to figure out how Flynn is not guilty, and they simply cannot do that.

Bwahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

Here are the documents you never accepted, they are from the FBI:

The Last Refuge

FBI Notes Released – Show Plan to Frame Michael Flynn For “Logan Act” Violation and/or “Lying” About It – With Goal For Removal…

Posted on April 29, 2020 by sundance

Excerpt:

The first of the sealed documents provided to the Flynn defense have been unsealed. The documents include emails between: FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, his FBI counsel Lisa Page, as well as FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI Agent Joe Pientka in the lead-up to the January 24, 2017 interview of Michael Flynn.
This specific release is the court filing of five pages that was initially turned-over to the Flynn defense team last Friday. [The pdf is here] [There are an additional 11 pages of documents from another production earlier today; those are not in this release]
The documents today also include handwritten notes taken by FBI counterintelligence chief William “Bill” Priestap; which show him both questioning and outlining the purpose of the interview: to remove National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.

According to the Priestap notes it appears the position of the FBI on January 23, 2017, was that Michael Flynn had violated the Logan Act by having a conversation with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak on December 29, 2016, prior to the inauguration.
This was a ridiculous position, there was no violation of the Logan Act; however, it was this position from which the questioning the next day, January 24 2017, would be based.
The next page of notes discusses the “Afterwards”:

The redactions are likely “the transcript“; where the FBI has the transcript of the call between Michael Flynn and Ambassador Kislyak. The redaction would be continued to protect the source of the material (“sources and methods”).


Interestingly, on the second day, the actual day of the interview, it appears Bill Priestap had second thoughts and was questioning the goal of the interview: “I thought about it last night and I believe we should rethink this”…

FBI Asst. Director for Counterintelligence Bill Priestap then asks the question: “what is our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?”
The premise of “wrongdoing” vis-a-vis a Logan Act violation was ridiculous. As the incoming National Security Advisor Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn would be talking to many counterparts throughout the globe. Even Priestap started to realize what they were doing was “playing games.”
Here’s the full release:

LINK

======

You going to deny them?

You are so bad at this, do you know what Sedition is?
So the whole premise of this so called framing of Flynn is predicated over a question? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: ,Dude, you have got to be kidding me? Get out of here with that ridiculous shit.

You are determined to ignore multiple documents that are right there in front of you, why are you trying so hard to ignore the evidence of conspiracy?

You suffer from a concussion or what?
Comments that have nothing to do with framing chief. Get a clue. There is nothing there in the English language that can be interpreted as framing someone. That's you and your fantasies doing that. Wake the hell, up.

Where is the evidence, you have any besides a lot of unsupported bullcrap?

Been waiting for hours for evidence to be posted from you,

Waiting,

waiting.....
 
The transcript revealed that in fact Flynn had conversations with Kislyak. Two, he then lied about hose conversations forcing Pence and Trump to get rid of Flynn.

Not a crime to talk with Kislyak.. Was his DUTY as incoming security chief on the Transistion Team.. Read the laws regarding Transistion Team privileges..
Nope! Wrong again. Get a clue. Flynn had no government position to discuss or make policy decisions behind the back of a sitting president. Flynn was setting policy, not transitioning. Big difference!

Not educating you here after too many years of being fed crap and liking it.., Go look up the FEDERAL LAWS created for Presidential Transistions.. Educate yourself before people just start ignoring you...
Transitions are not for setting policy. Why do you think Flynn lied about it? Dude, its simple horse sense logic. You look up the federal laws regarding people who are not government officials in a foreign policy setting who were committing treason. Boss, you lost this argument. And how do we know? Because no law exists for a non-government person to set foreign policy. Period! You show it to me hot shot. I can't show it because it doesn't exist.

When are you ever going to back up your claim on this, such a transition laws or...?

Otherwise everyone with a working brain are going to conclude you are trolling all over the place. You ignore posted links to laws, documents and FBI statements.

I wonder if you are paid to be this stupid here?
If I were trolling, you would have already provided the links. Hence, no links proving your point. Hence, no trolling. Try again.
 
The transcript revealed that in fact Flynn had conversations with Kislyak. Two, he then lied about hose conversations forcing Pence and Trump to get rid of Flynn.

Lying to Pence/Trump is NOT a crime.. And NOW both of those people realize they were fed really bad info about Flynn and back this dismissal of a "PROCESS" crime fully. Both Obama and Yates warned Trump that "Flynn couldn't be trusted".. Which is only because Obama HATED Flynn for standing up to him when he declared ISIS is dead..

There was no lie to the FBI.. The tapes of the Kislyak calls are out.. And it's clear that Flynn MADE NO DEALS with Russia regarding sanctions.. The ONLY thing discussed was that he URGED Russia "not to retaliate against the expulsion of diplomats... Don't think that runs COUNTER to the wishes of the US or EVEN the Obama Admin....
Lying to the FBI is a crime. Trump and Pence had a criminal working in the WH. And the transcripts reveal the truth, not bad info. Conversations between Flynn and Kislyak involving sanctions during an Obama presidency is treason. And the conversations were proven.

And Obama and Yates liking or not liking Flynn have nothing to do with the price of apples. Nor does Flynn and Kislyak not making a deal have anything to do with him conducting foreign policy. The man is a criminal. Next?

You lie over and over, you ignore the released FBI documents showing they conspired against Flynn, just as you ignore the released phone transcripts showing Flynn didn't do anything wrong.
There are no documents that exist that prove the FBI conspired against Flynn. There are only documents that exist proving the FBI did its job. The courts are trying to figure out how Flynn is not guilty, and they simply cannot do that.

Bwahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

Here are the documents you never accepted, they are from the FBI:

The Last Refuge

FBI Notes Released – Show Plan to Frame Michael Flynn For “Logan Act” Violation and/or “Lying” About It – With Goal For Removal…

Posted on April 29, 2020 by sundance

Excerpt:

The first of the sealed documents provided to the Flynn defense have been unsealed. The documents include emails between: FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, his FBI counsel Lisa Page, as well as FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI Agent Joe Pientka in the lead-up to the January 24, 2017 interview of Michael Flynn.
This specific release is the court filing of five pages that was initially turned-over to the Flynn defense team last Friday. [The pdf is here] [There are an additional 11 pages of documents from another production earlier today; those are not in this release]
The documents today also include handwritten notes taken by FBI counterintelligence chief William “Bill” Priestap; which show him both questioning and outlining the purpose of the interview: to remove National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.

According to the Priestap notes it appears the position of the FBI on January 23, 2017, was that Michael Flynn had violated the Logan Act by having a conversation with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak on December 29, 2016, prior to the inauguration.
This was a ridiculous position, there was no violation of the Logan Act; however, it was this position from which the questioning the next day, January 24 2017, would be based.
The next page of notes discusses the “Afterwards”:

The redactions are likely “the transcript“; where the FBI has the transcript of the call between Michael Flynn and Ambassador Kislyak. The redaction would be continued to protect the source of the material (“sources and methods”).


Interestingly, on the second day, the actual day of the interview, it appears Bill Priestap had second thoughts and was questioning the goal of the interview: “I thought about it last night and I believe we should rethink this”…

FBI Asst. Director for Counterintelligence Bill Priestap then asks the question: “what is our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?”
The premise of “wrongdoing” vis-a-vis a Logan Act violation was ridiculous. As the incoming National Security Advisor Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn would be talking to many counterparts throughout the globe. Even Priestap started to realize what they were doing was “playing games.”
Here’s the full release:

LINK

======

You going to deny them?

You are so bad at this, do you know what Sedition is?
So the whole premise of this so called framing of Flynn is predicated over a question? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: ,Dude, you have got to be kidding me? Get out of here with that ridiculous shit.

You are determined to ignore multiple documents that are right there in front of you, why are you trying so hard to ignore the evidence of conspiracy?

You suffer from a concussion or what?
Comments that have nothing to do with framing chief. Get a clue. There is nothing there in the English language that can be interpreted as framing someone. That's you and your fantasies doing that. Wake the hell, up.

Where is the evidence, you have any besides a lot of unsupported bullcrap?

Been waiting for hours for evidence to be posted from you,

Waiting,

waiting.....
The evidence I am right, is the very garbage you posted telling us nothing of a frame job. You do not understand the English language.
 
The transcript revealed that in fact Flynn had conversations with Kislyak. Two, he then lied about hose conversations forcing Pence and Trump to get rid of Flynn.

Not a crime to talk with Kislyak.. Was his DUTY as incoming security chief on the Transistion Team.. Read the laws regarding Transistion Team privileges..
Nope! Wrong again. Get a clue. Flynn had no government position to discuss or make policy decisions behind the back of a sitting president. Flynn was setting policy, not transitioning. Big difference!

Not educating you here after too many years of being fed crap and liking it.., Go look up the FEDERAL LAWS created for Presidential Transistions.. Educate yourself before people just start ignoring you...
Transitions are not for setting policy. Why do you think Flynn lied about it? Dude, its simple horse sense logic. You look up the federal laws regarding people who are not government officials in a foreign policy setting who were committing treason. Boss, you lost this argument. And how do we know? Because no law exists for a non-government person to set foreign policy. Period! You show it to me hot shot. I can't show it because it doesn't exist.

When are you ever going to back up your claim on this, such a transition laws or...?

Otherwise everyone with a working brain are going to conclude you are trolling all over the place. You ignore posted links to laws, documents and FBI statements.

I wonder if you are paid to be this stupid here?
If I were trolling, you would have already provided the links. Hence, no links proving your point. Hence, no trolling. Try again.

Now you are LYING like hell, I posted several links here in the thread.

You saw them already, you lying dumb FUCK!

FBI Notes Released – Show Plan to Frame Michael Flynn For “Logan Act” Violation and/or “Lying” About It – With Goal For Removal…

and,

The DOJ -vs- FBI Blame Game Begins – DOJ Release Documents to Support Dropping Flynn Case…

and,

Nothing Inappropriate – DNI John Ratcliffe Releases Wiretapped Flynn-Kislyak Transcripts and FBI Summaries (“CR Cuts”) Of Those Transcripts…

All right here in THIS thread.

You are a proven bald faced liar!
 
The transcript revealed that in fact Flynn had conversations with Kislyak. Two, he then lied about hose conversations forcing Pence and Trump to get rid of Flynn.

Not a crime to talk with Kislyak.. Was his DUTY as incoming security chief on the Transistion Team.. Read the laws regarding Transistion Team privileges..
Nope! Wrong again. Get a clue. Flynn had no government position to discuss or make policy decisions behind the back of a sitting president. Flynn was setting policy, not transitioning. Big difference!

Not educating you here after too many years of being fed crap and liking it.., Go look up the FEDERAL LAWS created for Presidential Transistions.. Educate yourself before people just start ignoring you...
Transitions are not for setting policy. Why do you think Flynn lied about it? Dude, its simple horse sense logic. You look up the federal laws regarding people who are not government officials in a foreign policy setting who were committing treason. Boss, you lost this argument. And how do we know? Because no law exists for a non-government person to set foreign policy. Period! You show it to me hot shot. I can't show it because it doesn't exist.

Transitions are not for setting policy.

So what's the proper charge for his calls?

You look up the federal laws regarding people who are not government officials in a foreign policy setting who were committing treason.

Treason? You funny, bitch!

Because no law exists for a non-government person to set foreign policy. Period!

So there is no law against it?
Not setting policy. Period! Next?

Your last question is nonsensical.
 
The transcript revealed that in fact Flynn had conversations with Kislyak. Two, he then lied about hose conversations forcing Pence and Trump to get rid of Flynn.

Not a crime to talk with Kislyak.. Was his DUTY as incoming security chief on the Transistion Team.. Read the laws regarding Transistion Team privileges..
Nope! Wrong again. Get a clue. Flynn had no government position to discuss or make policy decisions behind the back of a sitting president. Flynn was setting policy, not transitioning. Big difference!

Not educating you here after too many years of being fed crap and liking it.., Go look up the FEDERAL LAWS created for Presidential Transistions.. Educate yourself before people just start ignoring you...
Transitions are not for setting policy. Why do you think Flynn lied about it? Dude, its simple horse sense logic. You look up the federal laws regarding people who are not government officials in a foreign policy setting who were committing treason. Boss, you lost this argument. And how do we know? Because no law exists for a non-government person to set foreign policy. Period! You show it to me hot shot. I can't show it because it doesn't exist.

When are you ever going to back up your claim on this, such a transition laws or...?

Otherwise everyone with a working brain are going to conclude you are trolling all over the place. You ignore posted links to laws, documents and FBI statements.

I wonder if you are paid to be this stupid here?
If I were trolling, you would have already provided the links. Hence, no links proving your point. Hence, no trolling. Try again.

Now you are LYING like hell, I posted several links here in the thread.

You saw them already, you lying dumb FUCK!

FBI Notes Released – Show Plan to Frame Michael Flynn For “Logan Act” Violation and/or “Lying” About It – With Goal For Removal…

and,

The DOJ -vs- FBI Blame Game Begins – DOJ Release Documents to Support Dropping Flynn Case…

and,

Nothing Inappropriate – DNI John Ratcliffe Releases Wiretapped Flynn-Kislyak Transcripts and FBI Summaries (“CR Cuts”) Of Those Transcripts…

All right here in THIS thread.

You are a proven bald faced liar!
I saw the links. And nothing in the English language would tell anyone who has a functioning brain that it was a correspondence over framing Flynn.

You obviously do not possess the intelligence to differentiate between discussing a case, versus putting it into the context of a frame job. That's your handicap not mine.
 
The transcript revealed that in fact Flynn had conversations with Kislyak. Two, he then lied about hose conversations forcing Pence and Trump to get rid of Flynn.

Not a crime to talk with Kislyak.. Was his DUTY as incoming security chief on the Transistion Team.. Read the laws regarding Transistion Team privileges..
Nope! Wrong again. Get a clue. Flynn had no government position to discuss or make policy decisions behind the back of a sitting president. Flynn was setting policy, not transitioning. Big difference!

Not educating you here after too many years of being fed crap and liking it.., Go look up the FEDERAL LAWS created for Presidential Transistions.. Educate yourself before people just start ignoring you...
Transitions are not for setting policy. Why do you think Flynn lied about it? Dude, its simple horse sense logic. You look up the federal laws regarding people who are not government officials in a foreign policy setting who were committing treason. Boss, you lost this argument. And how do we know? Because no law exists for a non-government person to set foreign policy. Period! You show it to me hot shot. I can't show it because it doesn't exist.

When are you ever going to back up your claim on this, such a transition laws or...?

Otherwise everyone with a working brain are going to conclude you are trolling all over the place. You ignore posted links to laws, documents and FBI statements.

I wonder if you are paid to be this stupid here?
If I were trolling, you would have already provided the links. Hence, no links proving your point. Hence, no trolling. Try again.

Now you are LYING like hell, I posted several links here in the thread.

You saw them already, you lying dumb FUCK!

FBI Notes Released – Show Plan to Frame Michael Flynn For “Logan Act” Violation and/or “Lying” About It – With Goal For Removal…

and,

The DOJ -vs- FBI Blame Game Begins – DOJ Release Documents to Support Dropping Flynn Case…

and,

Nothing Inappropriate – DNI John Ratcliffe Releases Wiretapped Flynn-Kislyak Transcripts and FBI Summaries (“CR Cuts”) Of Those Transcripts…

All right here in THIS thread.

You are a proven bald faced liar!
Show us the exact quotes from those links of yours, then I want you to dissect the words, and explain exactly how those words equate to a framing of Flynn. You can't do it. I already read the quotes. The words typed by the investigators will never let it happen. You are driven by pure fantasy and lies to yourself. You folks have got to get a grip.
 
FBI's top lawyer ousted amid criticism for role in Flynn investigation One must ask, how can an administration be this stupid by exposing their own dishonesty with Michael Flynn, while their own AG calls for dismissing the charges against Flynn? And the newly released transcripts by Trumps own National Intelligence director John Ratcliffe, which exposes Flynn for doing exactly what the FBI claimed he was doing, and revealing Trump and Pence letting Flynn go for lying. So what is there to defend? Lol! Nothing! Barr and Ratcliffe cut their own legs off by releasing the transcripts and verifying that what the Obama administration did was spot on, while proving Flynn did in fact have conversations with Kislyak over sanctions, and later Flynn lied about those conversations. Trump is desperate to get Flynn off, and they themselves just exposed the criminality by Flynn.

Flynn was blackmailed you say? For what? Nothing! Flynn did this, not the FBI. They did their job. And what does the the Trump administration do in its desperation? It fires the career lawyer for the FBI. What a bunch of low life's. This country has gone straight to hell with Trumps corruption.
You are completely delusional, thats not ad-hominem, its literal fact, you and every other democrat are virtually psychotic and incapable of realizing the true scope of just what it was your evil slavemasters, under Obama's close supervision, perpetrated, let alone understanding the how and why! We have definitive, indisputable proof of Obama's treason, of the treason at FBI/DOJ and at Foggy Bottom, and yet here you are, regurgitating patently false democratic party propaganda.... Let me be perfectly frank with you scumbag, they lied to you and manipulated you, they told you exactly what it was you wanted to hear, and it was and remains, all lies! :fu:
 
This "outrage" was a Rachael Maddow fantasy.. Wasn't it? She hasn't told you truth about ANYTHING Trump/Russia in over 4 years and you're still feasting on this shit... Good luck with that...
Thanks for your surrender. Saying nothing is always a good thing. It was actually a John Ratcliffe fantasy gone bad.

You are so full of shit, they call you browneyes.

He didn't surrender you asshole.

Call whatever school "educated" you and ask for your money back.

You were ripped off.
 
The transcript revealed that in fact Flynn had conversations with Kislyak. Two, he then lied about hose conversations forcing Pence and Trump to get rid of Flynn.

Not a crime to talk with Kislyak.. Was his DUTY as incoming security chief on the Transistion Team.. Read the laws regarding Transistion Team privileges..
Nope! Wrong again. Get a clue. Flynn had no government position to discuss or make policy decisions behind the back of a sitting president. Flynn was setting policy, not transitioning. Big difference!

Not educating you here after too many years of being fed crap and liking it.., Go look up the FEDERAL LAWS created for Presidential Transistions.. Educate yourself before people just start ignoring you...
Transitions are not for setting policy. Why do you think Flynn lied about it? Dude, its simple horse sense logic. You look up the federal laws regarding people who are not government officials in a foreign policy setting who were committing treason. Boss, you lost this argument. And how do we know? Because no law exists for a non-government person to set foreign policy. Period! You show it to me hot shot. I can't show it because it doesn't exist.

When are you ever going to back up your claim on this, such a transition laws or...?

Otherwise everyone with a working brain are going to conclude you are trolling all over the place. You ignore posted links to laws, documents and FBI statements.

I wonder if you are paid to be this stupid here?
If I were trolling, you would have already provided the links. Hence, no links proving your point. Hence, no trolling. Try again.

Now you are LYING like hell, I posted several links here in the thread.

You saw them already, you lying dumb FUCK!

FBI Notes Released – Show Plan to Frame Michael Flynn For “Logan Act” Violation and/or “Lying” About It – With Goal For Removal…

and,

The DOJ -vs- FBI Blame Game Begins – DOJ Release Documents to Support Dropping Flynn Case…

and,

Nothing Inappropriate – DNI John Ratcliffe Releases Wiretapped Flynn-Kislyak Transcripts and FBI Summaries (“CR Cuts”) Of Those Transcripts…

All right here in THIS thread.

You are a proven bald faced liar!
Show us the exact quotes from those links of yours, then I want you to dissect the words, and explain exactly how those words equate to a framing of Flynn. You can't do it. I already read the quotes. The words typed by the investigators will never let it happen. You are driven by pure fantasy and lies to yourself. You folks have got to get a grip.

Fuck you.

You somehow think you are worthy of that.

You come to the board, make stupid claims, don't back them up, and run when they are shoved up your ass.
 
There are two defenses here for Flynn by the losing team. One, it's the part about how he was framed, and two, it's defending Flynn's right to set policy with Kislyak while Flynn is an ordinary citizen. Neither one of these defenses has any merit, and the fact that he did wrong, while trying to hide the wrong doing by putting the blame on framing by the FBI, already tells anyone with a brain, and is honest, the two defenses are beyond laughable. You lose.
 
The transcript revealed that in fact Flynn had conversations with Kislyak. Two, he then lied about hose conversations forcing Pence and Trump to get rid of Flynn.

Not a crime to talk with Kislyak.. Was his DUTY as incoming security chief on the Transistion Team.. Read the laws regarding Transistion Team privileges..
Nope! Wrong again. Get a clue. Flynn had no government position to discuss or make policy decisions behind the back of a sitting president. Flynn was setting policy, not transitioning. Big difference!

Not educating you here after too many years of being fed crap and liking it.., Go look up the FEDERAL LAWS created for Presidential Transistions.. Educate yourself before people just start ignoring you...
Transitions are not for setting policy. Why do you think Flynn lied about it? Dude, its simple horse sense logic. You look up the federal laws regarding people who are not government officials in a foreign policy setting who were committing treason. Boss, you lost this argument. And how do we know? Because no law exists for a non-government person to set foreign policy. Period! You show it to me hot shot. I can't show it because it doesn't exist.

When are you ever going to back up your claim on this, such a transition laws or...?

Otherwise everyone with a working brain are going to conclude you are trolling all over the place. You ignore posted links to laws, documents and FBI statements.

I wonder if you are paid to be this stupid here?
If I were trolling, you would have already provided the links. Hence, no links proving your point. Hence, no trolling. Try again.

Now you are LYING like hell, I posted several links here in the thread.

You saw them already, you lying dumb FUCK!

FBI Notes Released – Show Plan to Frame Michael Flynn For “Logan Act” Violation and/or “Lying” About It – With Goal For Removal…

and,

The DOJ -vs- FBI Blame Game Begins – DOJ Release Documents to Support Dropping Flynn Case…

and,

Nothing Inappropriate – DNI John Ratcliffe Releases Wiretapped Flynn-Kislyak Transcripts and FBI Summaries (“CR Cuts”) Of Those Transcripts…

All right here in THIS thread.

You are a proven bald faced liar!
Show us the exact quotes from those links of yours, then I want you to dissect the words, and explain exactly how those words equate to a framing of Flynn. You can't do it. I already read the quotes. The words typed by the investigators will never let it happen. You are driven by pure fantasy and lies to yourself. You folks have got to get a grip.

Fuck you.

You somehow think you are worthy of that.

You come to the board, make stupid claims, don't back them up, and run when they are shoved up your ass.
That's right, "fuck you." When the argument is lost, the truth has been told, blame the guy for telling the truth and presenting the facts. Same to you piece of shit loser.
 

Forum List

Back
Top