The tea party is the wrong way

[Contumacious]

We don't want to get rid of government. We want to get rid of the small far leftist gang running everything and put in people who will tell us the truth and stop the corrupt trash in charge.

Leftwingers and rightwingers will lie like a rug.

We DO want to get rid of government.

.

Speak for yourself. The Tea Party is not anti-government.

Be that as it may, what is the purpose of replacing one set of sof-of-bitches for another?!?!?!?

.

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[Rotagilla]

Life in a modern, industrialized, technologically advanced, 21st Century society such as the United States is far too complex to be appropriately and successfully administered by the simplistic, naïve, childish, inane, and reactionary social/legal/economic paradigm advocated by the likes of the ‘tea party.’

Yes, indeed.

Centrally planned economies did great in the former USSR, Somalia, Cuba , Venezuela and those socialist paradises.

I think you missed the thrust of the argument, the tea party has a lot of simple solutions to complex problems that are probably wrong and very likely to create bigger problems but they are dead set on trying it anyway. Prime among this is the belief that tax cuts for the wealthy will eventually trickle down, we just have not given them enough of a break yet.

Show me where it says any of that in the tea party platform?

 

[Ibentoken]

This makes no sense, as we currently have ‘Constitutional government.’

The government is functioning now in accordance with the Constitution, with the original intent of the Framers, and as acknowledged and codified by its case law, as the Constitution exists only in the context of its case law.

The ‘tea party’ represents many on the right who are either ignorant of, or have contempt for, the Constitution and its case law.

They really don't have a clue on what they're talking about. They're the modern day archarist that want to get rid of government. Facts, we don't need no stinking facts.

Could they post a real arguement for what they say they want? Based on the consitution???

They won't even try,

The Tea Party are citizens who work and pay taxes. We believe the current administration is corrupt to the core. We know that doesn't matter to the trash like occupiers and new age derelicts. We love our country. You are the haters.

 

[Ibentoken]

Leftists lie. That's all you need to know.

 

[Nutz]

They really don't have a clue on what they're talking about. They're the modern day archarist that want to get rid of government. Facts, we don't need no stinking facts.

Could they post a real arguement for what they say they want? Based on the consitution???

They won't even try,

The Tea Party are citizens who work and pay taxes. We believe the current administration is corrupt to the core. We know that doesn't matter to the trash like occupiers and new age derelicts. We love our country. You are the haters.

and the government is unconstitutional, how? why won't anyone answer that question

 

[The T]

They won't even try,

The Tea Party are citizens who work and pay taxes. We believe the current administration is corrupt to the core. We know that doesn't matter to the trash like occupiers and new age derelicts. We love our country. You are the haters.

and the government is unconstitutional, how? why won't anyone answer that question

How many TIMES does Obama have to demonstrate selective enforcement of LAW(S)?

*IDIOT*

How many more kicks in the ASS to your LIBERTY will YOU ignore?

 

[Nutz]

The Tea Party are citizens who work and pay taxes. We believe the current administration is corrupt to the core. We know that doesn't matter to the trash like occupiers and new age derelicts. We love our country. You are the haters.

and the government is unconstitutional, how? why won't anyone answer that question

How many TIMES does Obama have to demonstrate selective enforcement of LAW(S)?

*IDIOT*

How many more kicks in the ASS to your LIBERTY will YOU ignore?

Example? And I thought the teapers were about the Constitution. ?.not Obama

 

[occupied]

Tax cuts will ONLY work if they are accompanied by reducing expenses.

In 2008 , Bush II reduced taxes while vastly increasing expenses thereby sending the economy into a massive recession.

.

Tax cuts for the wealthy only work to get more campaign contributions from the wealthy, they have no other purpose.

Only parasites make comments like that.

If you believe that you are ENTITLED to your neighbors' wealth then it will irritate you to no end if the government allows him/her to keep his money.

.
.

You cannot show that tax cuts for billionaires do anything except make billionaires give politicians more money. You guys should probably put the whole trickle down argument to bed. You apparently don't care that it does not stimulate the economy in any way so why bother repeating the big lie that it does?

 

[Ibentoken]

They won't even try,

The Tea Party are citizens who work and pay taxes. We believe the current administration is corrupt to the core. We know that doesn't matter to the trash like occupiers and new age derelicts. We love our country. You are the haters.

and the government is unconstitutional, how? why won't anyone answer that question

This government abused taxpayers with the IRS. This government abused taxpayers at the Bundy Ranch. This government ignored the advice of Generals about Iraq and how and when to leave. This government lied about health care. This government promised to be transparent. Corrupt.

 

[ScienceRocks]

I think you missed the thrust of the argument, the tea party has a lot of simple solutions to complex problems that are probably wrong and very likely to create bigger problems but they are dead set on trying it anyway. Prime among this is the belief that tax cuts for the wealthy will eventually trickle down, we just have not given them enough of a break yet.

Tax cuts will ONLY work if they are accompanied by reducing expenses.

In 2008 , Bush II reduced taxes while vastly increasing expenses thereby sending the economy into a massive recession.

.

Tax cuts for the wealthy only work to get more campaign contributions from the wealthy, they have no other purpose.

Don't they the wealthy already pay far less than us in the lower class???

 

[bripat9643]

Tax cuts for the wealthy only work to get more campaign contributions from the wealthy, they have no other purpose.

Only parasites make comments like that.

If you believe that you are ENTITLED to your neighbors' wealth then it will irritate you to no end if the government allows him/her to keep his money.

.
.

You cannot show that tax cuts for billionaires do anything except make billionaires give politicians more money. You guys should probably put the whole trickle down argument to bed. You apparently don't care that it does not stimulate the economy in any way so why bother repeating the big lie that it does?

I don't recall Congress ever passing a tax cut especially for billionaires. Could you refer us to the number of that bill?

 

[Ibentoken]

Tax cuts for the wealthy only work to get more campaign contributions from the wealthy, they have no other purpose.

Only parasites make comments like that.

If you believe that you are ENTITLED to your neighbors' wealth then it will irritate you to no end if the government allows him/her to keep his money.

.
.

You cannot show that tax cuts for billionaires do anything except make billionaires give politicians more money. You guys should probably put the whole trickle down argument to bed. You apparently don't care that it does not stimulate the economy in any way so why bother repeating the big lie that it does?

I'm not a billionaire and I got a tax cut. Everyone who pays taxes got a cut. If you need to lie to make a point then you don't have one. All you are is a propaganda parrot.

 

[Nutz]

The Tea Party are citizens who work and pay taxes. We believe the current administration is corrupt to the core. We know that doesn't matter to the trash like occupiers and new age derelicts. We love our country. You are the haters.

and the government is unconstitutional, how? why won't anyone answer that question

This government abused taxpayers with the IRS. This government abused taxpayers at the Bundy Ranch. This government ignored the advice of Generals about Iraq and how and when to leave. This government lied about health care. This government promised to be transparent. Corrupt.

So...some things happened that you don't agree with and because of that, you are saying the Government is unconstitutional. Did any of this unconstitutionality occur before Obama?

BTW, I can agree with you aboutthe IRS scandal...if it all comes out to be true, heads need to roll. But the rest of your reasoning is nonsense.

 

[blackhawk]

Whole lot of S.S.D.D. on just the first page of this thread.

 

[Ibentoken]

Tax cuts will ONLY work if they are accompanied by reducing expenses.

In 2008 , Bush II reduced taxes while vastly increasing expenses thereby sending the economy into a massive recession.

.

Tax cuts for the wealthy only work to get more campaign contributions from the wealthy, they have no other purpose.

Don't the wealthy already pay far less than us in the lower class???

What about the millions in tax money given to Obama by alternative energy companies who went bankrupt?

 

[eagle1462010]

and the government is unconstitutional, how? why won't anyone answer that question

This government abused taxpayers with the IRS. This government abused taxpayers at the Bundy Ranch. This government ignored the advice of Generals about Iraq and how and when to leave. This government lied about health care. This government promised to be transparent. Corrupt.

So...some things happened that you don't disagree with and because of that, you are saying the Government is unconstitutional. Did any of this unconstitutionality occur before Obama?

Yawn..........People point out violations of the Constitution and you straw man it into our saying the Government is Unconstitutional. Again, Yawn.

Obama has violated it, and ignores laws he doesn't agree with. ICE for example. He swore and oath to preserve and protect the Constitution, by ignoring laws does he not violate that oath?

Have others done so in the past? Yes, Absolutely............The Defense of Obama is usually that others did it, so it's ok for him to do it now...................

So, if a robber robs a bank and gets away with it...............I should be able to do it to............Get caught..........well the other guy did it..............

Blah Blah Blah.

 

[Ibentoken]

and the government is unconstitutional, how? why won't anyone answer that question

This government abused taxpayers with the IRS. This government abused taxpayers at the Bundy Ranch. This government ignored the advice of Generals about Iraq and how and when to leave. This government lied about health care. This government promised to be transparent. Corrupt.

So...some things happened that you don't disagree with and because of that, you are saying the Government is unconstitutional. Did any of this unconstitutionality occur before Obama?

BTW, I can agree with you aboutthe IRS scandal...if it all comes out to be true, heads need to roll. But the rest of your reasoning is nonsense.

You agree with the government tactics at the Bundy Ranch?

 

[Nutz]

This government abused taxpayers with the IRS. This government abused taxpayers at the Bundy Ranch. This government ignored the advice of Generals about Iraq and how and when to leave. This government lied about health care. This government promised to be transparent. Corrupt.

So...some things happened that you don't disagree with and because of that, you are saying the Government is unconstitutional. Did any of this unconstitutionality occur before Obama?

Yawn..........People point out violations of the Constitution and you straw man it into our saying the Government is Unconstitutional. Again, Yawn.

Obama has violated it, and ignores laws he doesn't agree with. ICE for example. He swore and oath to preserve and protect the Constitution, by ignoring laws does he not violate that oath?

Have others done so in the past? Yes, Absolutely............The Defense of Obama is usually that others did it, so it's ok for him to do it now...................

So, if a robber robs a bank and gets away with it...............I should be able to do it to............Get caught..........well the other guy did it..............

Blah Blah Blah.

Yawn...and you people were incredibly silent prior to Obama and you blame him for the norm in Washington.

So, what is your REAL motivation?

So, if a Cliven Bundy refuses to pay a lawful bill and gets away with it because a bunch of teapers and nutters threatened an armed insurrection, should I get away without paying my taxes.

Yawn...I didn't think any of the Teapers could come up with a rational reason.

 

[Nutz]

This government abused taxpayers with the IRS. This government abused taxpayers at the Bundy Ranch. This government ignored the advice of Generals about Iraq and how and when to leave. This government lied about health care. This government promised to be transparent. Corrupt.

So...some things happened that you don't disagree with and because of that, you are saying the Government is unconstitutional. Did any of this unconstitutionality occur before Obama?

BTW, I can agree with you aboutthe IRS scandal...if it all comes out to be true, heads need to roll. But the rest of your reasoning is nonsense.

You agree with the government tactics at the Bundy Ranch?

Do you think Bundy should have to pay his bills like everyone else in America? What is law enforcement supposed to do...offer Bundy flowers and ask that he do the right thing?

But no, I think the government should have been more aggressive with these racist nutters who want a revolution.