- Jun 19, 2009
- 17,471
- 6,845
- 335
- Thread starter
- #41
Penelopes position is problematic,
because she feels the dispersed Jews after the Holocaust and who Europe and even America mostly refused as refugees had no right to safety in their former land that Britts owned and were giving back portions of.
Yet Penelope supports the opposite this position to anti anointed (anti-christs),
terrorists & it's supporters, Lebanon and Gaza Occupiers and war mongerers, Iranian supporters called Syrians who Europe this time around is taking in.
Basically Penelope is compassionate for
the Assyrians and rejecting the prince of peace Hezekiah and his right to live peacefully in Judah.
The RCC raised her to hate Jews and Israel just as it raised Hitler and the SS.
All parties felt inadequate next to the success of it's people and system which the Vatican failed to emulate and turn sucessful. The Vatican failure could not be a human ego admission so they kash out against others in displaced blame and deflective behavior.
Penelope's fear and hate of Jews is a fear and hatred of what she and her church had failed and become.
Your full of it. The RCC never taught us to hate anyone, and also we are not taught we are the "chosen ones" .
Lebanon and Gaza have more a right to the land they are on than the Ashkenazis.
Read carefully : I am refering to
Syria as the occupiers of
Lebanon and Gaza.
So by your statement which lacks historical knowledge, Do you think the Palestinians in Gaza are Shalemites or Shemites?