The Struggle

[Captain Creeper]

One must remember that having adversity to struggle and revolt against is an essential requirement in applied Marxism. Even in the Soviet Union, where the command-control communists took control, the leaders still squawked about “the struggle”; the revolution continued. It had to. One may reasonably wonder what they were talking about. The commies had already won the revolution in Russia. The struggle should have been over at that point. But it was not. It had to continue, or else the central lie of communism would be exposed (I.e., Marxism is not at all good for the working class; it is a fraud).

Thus, the “struggle” then had to be against the west and capitalism in general. This allowed for the revolution to continue ad nauseum. Essentially, the working class revolution to obtain a vested interest in their futures through collectivism (which is a perverse joke on an existential level) became a quest for world domination. The workers would have to wait further for utopia, toiling away in the coal mines as their leaders sipped lightly chilled champagne and enjoyed the good life.

When it comes to sociology, Marx and Engels were complete sociopaths. As such, their proponents today are complete sociopaths. Just look at the things they lobby for: sexual mutilation; killing unborn human babies; violent rebellion and anarchy; open borders; etc… Their minds are sickened and depraved due to their complete lack of moral clarity.

Conservatives do not face a “struggle”. Our core philosophy is not fighting evil for some cause. That is the left. I note that the left’s motivation sounds rather like a religious mission. Pretty ironic, isn’t it?

Conservatives know that freedom and liberty is vested in the individual. The individual is a sovereign, chartered by God, free from any form of repression and regulation except what he or she cedes to the state in a mutual compact to further the individuals’ desires. If the state fails to further individuals’ desires, then it is worthless and shall be replaced. Government is controlled by us, not the other way around. By vesting rights and liberties in the individual, rather than the collective, you minimize the risk of tyranny arising. You have no human dignity in the collective. You are just a disposable cog in the machine. But as an individual, you do. Maintaining said dignity, and freedom, is worth fighting for. Fighting to maintain the group, which may or may not be responsive to your individual core needs, is not worth fighting for.

 

[Woodznutz]

One must remember that having adversity to struggle and revolt against is an essential requirement in applied Marxism. Even in the Soviet Union, where the command-control communists took control, the leaders still squawked about “the struggle”; the revolution continued. It had to. One may reasonably wonder what they were talking about. The commies had already won the revolution in Russia. The struggle should have been over at that point. But it was not. It had to continue, or else the central lie of communism would be exposed (I.e., Marxism is not at all good for the working class; it is a fraud).

Thus, the “struggle” then had to be against the west and capitalism in general. This allowed for the revolution to continue ad nauseum. Essentially, the working class revolution to obtain a vested interest in their futures through collectivism (which is a perverse joke on an existential level) became a quest for world domination. The workers would have to wait further for utopia, toiling away in the coal mines as their leaders sipped lightly chilled champagne and enjoyed the good life.

When it comes to sociology, Marx and Engels were complete sociopaths. As such, their proponents today are complete sociopaths. Just look at the things they lobby for: sexual mutilation; killing unborn human babies; violent rebellion and anarchy; open borders; etc… Their minds are sickened and depraved due to their complete lack of moral clarity.

Conservatives do not face a “struggle”. Our core philosophy is not fighting evil for some cause. That is the left. I note that the left’s motivation sounds rather like a religious mission. Pretty ironic, isn’t it?

Conservatives know that freedom and liberty is vested in the individual. The individual is a sovereign, chartered by God, free from any form of repression and regulation except what he or she cedes to the state in a mutual compact to further the individuals’ desires. If the state fails to further individuals’ desires, then it is worthless and shall be replaced. Government is controlled by us, not the other way around. By vesting rights and liberties in the individual, rather than the collective, you minimize the risk of tyranny arising. You have no human dignity in the collective. You are just a disposable cog in the machine. But as an individual, you do. Maintaining said dignity, and freedom, is worth fighting for. Fighting to maintain the group, which may or may not be responsive to your individual core needs, is not worth fighting for.

Our leaders are false leaders. No good can come from them. It's people living responsibly that keeps our ship on an even keel.