- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,844
- 4,782
- 265
I see you still have no evidence for concrete cores for the twin towersSee? This is like arguing with a sports fan.
"MY team is ALWAYS better than YOUR team". Then they smash you in the head with a beer bottle.
Except you made an assertion without evidence.
And from a position of ignorance
Okay, I'll provide the evidence, as I have it quickly and readily on hand.
I have always found it an interesting piece. Why? Because it is the final piece of evidence that convinced me what side of this debate is right. NIST provided a model of why WTC collapsed, and the scientific community took their data and reviewed it. After peer review, they told NIST that their theory was not scientific, so NIST went back to the drawing board and came up with a new model. They did this several times, and several times the scientific community told them WTC 7 could not have collapsed the way NIST theorized it could have.
Eventually, they had to CLASSIFY the data so that NO PEER REVIEW could take place. And as has been pointed out, the collapse still in no way resembles the final model NIST ended up with.
Why did they classify the data that they used this time to make the model when they didn't do it any other time? Well, the official reason is that it would, "JEOPARDIZE PUBLIC SAFETY."
If you are obtuse, you believe this excuse.
I have a friend who understands what this means, public safety would be at risk, b/c if the public knew the truth, they would be rioting in the streets and throwing trying to throw these rascals out. Violent revolution definitely is a risk to public safety, wouldn't you say?
Here's that proof you wanted. It is provided by a whistle blower site run by one of the founders of wiki-leaks. He found that wiki-leaks was controlled by the establishment, so he set up his own site. Welcome to Cryptome.
http://cryptome.org/wtc-nist-wtc7-no.pdf
I see a request for structural calculations for columns 79 and 81.
I see an appeal to a denial of a FOIA request.
This is on a page titled "wtc-nist-wtc7-no.pdf"
The misinformation of steel core columns of the Twin Towers indicates that there are around 40 columns.
Therefore along with the title of the file link you posted,"wtc-nist-wtc7-no.pdf", I conclude your information relates to WTC 7 and not the Twin Towers.
Thank you for providing evidence with your post. It has however been disqualified in its validity to the topic which is only concerning the core of the Twin Towers.