The strange case of Mark Sanford

[bk1983]

If Sanford were President of the US and committed this act, you would then say, it was worse than conducting foreign policy while getting fellated?

Absolutely.

But he isn't president.

Then why ask the question in the first place Einstein?

 

[elvis]

Absolutely.

But he isn't president.

Then why ask the question in the first place Einstein?

I'll ask whatever questions I like. don't like it? Go **** yourself.

 

[elvis]

Absolutely.

But he isn't president.

So?

He's a governor. Same job, smaller pond.

The risks are much greater being that Clinton was President.

 

[Article 15]

But he isn't president.

So?

He's a governor. Same job, smaller pond.

The risks are much greater being that Clinton was President.

Huh?

I got no idea where you are going with this. What exactly is your point?

 

[bk1983]

But he isn't president.

Then why ask the question in the first place Einstein?

I'll ask whatever questions I like. don't like it? Go **** yourself.

Your question starts, If Sanford were president, then after Article 15 answers, your reply is but he isnt president.. lol.. oh your hilarious, well you have clearly exposed yourself in this thread.

 

[elvis]

So?

He's a governor. Same job, smaller pond.

The risks are much greater being that Clinton was President.

Huh?

I got no idea where you are going with this. What exactly is your point?

Maybe that our national security was put in peril by clinton doing that.

 

[bk1983]

So?

He's a governor. Same job, smaller pond.

The risks are much greater being that Clinton was President.

Huh?

I got no idea where you are going with this. What exactly is your point?

I don't think he knows what his point is.

 

[Article 15]

The risks are much greater being that Clinton was President.

Huh?

I got no idea where you are going with this. What exactly is your point?

Maybe that our national security was put in peril by clinton doing that.

No offense, E, but that's pretty ridiculous.

 

[elvis]

Then why ask the question in the first place Einstein?

I'll ask whatever questions I like. don't like it? Go **** yourself.

Your question starts, If Sanford were president, then after Article 15 answers, your reply is but he isnt president.. lol.. oh your hilarious, well you have clearly exposed yourself in this thread.

exposed nothing. I wanted to see what Article would say if they were of equal rank. I got the answer. Then I posted the point that they are not of equal rank. So once again, I will post questions in whatever order I choose, and **** off if you don't like it.

 

[elvis]

Huh?

I got no idea where you are going with this. What exactly is your point?

Maybe that our national security was put in peril by clinton doing that.

No offense, E, but that's pretty ridiculous.

You don't think the president should be mentally participative when on the phone conducting foreign policy?

 

[bk1983]

I'll ask whatever questions I like. don't like it? Go **** yourself.

Your question starts, If Sanford were president, then after Article 15 answers, your reply is but he isnt president.. lol.. oh your hilarious, well you have clearly exposed yourself in this thread.

exposed nothing. I wanted to see what Article would say if they were of equal rank. I got the answer. Then I posted the point that they are not of equal rank. So once again, I will post questions in whatever order I choose, and **** off if you don't like it.

Bravo keep up the good work

 

[Article 15]

Maybe that our national security was put in peril by clinton doing that.

No offense, E, but that's pretty ridiculous.

You don't think the president should be mentally participative when on the phone conducting foreign policy?

You don't think he can get blown and think at the same time? You're a history buff ... you must know the stories about POTUS' being drunk on the job or on pain killers and things of that nature.

Would it be worse in your eyes for a POTUS to get blown on the phone in the Oval Office than it would be for a POTUS to lie saying he was going one place only to leave the country to have a week in the sack with his foreign mistress?

I know which of the evils I think is lesser.

 

[elvis]

Your question starts, If Sanford were president, then after Article 15 answers, your reply is but he isnt president.. lol.. oh your hilarious, well you have clearly exposed yourself in this thread.

exposed nothing. I wanted to see what Article would say if they were of equal rank. I got the answer. Then I posted the point that they are not of equal rank. So once again, I will post questions in whatever order I choose, and **** off if you don't like it.

Bravo keep up the good work

Sorry you are so simple-minded.

 

[bk1983]

exposed nothing. I wanted to see what Article would say if they were of equal rank. I got the answer. Then I posted the point that they are not of equal rank. So once again, I will post questions in whatever order I choose, and **** off if you don't like it.

Bravo keep up the good work

Sorry you are so simple-minded.

Oh, good one. By the way you have any more genius hypotheticals to make your point? Because I am sure everyone agrees your point was really starting to slam home.

 

[bk1983]

Oh Maria!

 

[elvis]

No offense, E, but that's pretty ridiculous.

You don't think the president should be mentally participative when on the phone conducting foreign policy?

You don't think he can get blown and think at the same time? You're a history buff ... you must know the stories about POTUS' being drunk on the job or on pain killers and things of that nature.

Would it be worse in your eyes for a POTUS to get blown on the phone in the Oval Office than it would be for a POTUS to lie saying he was going one place only to leave the country to have a week in the sack with his foreign mistress?

I know which of the evils I think is lesser.

I don't think one should make any major decisions while that is happening.
I don't know to what extent pain killers affect decision making.
Alcohol: If bush fell off the wagon, I'd want him thrown out on his ass.

 

[Nik]

you dumbfuck
that doesnt effect other states
then you wonder why you are seen as a ******* MORON

Really?

So when NY raised its taxes and Golisano "fled" to Florida, that didn't effect Florida? Is this honestly your claim?

the NY law did not effect FL
dumbass

So the law that caused a billionaire to move to Florida somehow didn't effect Florida?

Are you sure you want to hold this position?

 

[elvis]

Bravo keep up the good work

Sorry you are so simple-minded.

Oh, good one. By the way you have any more genius hypotheticals to make your point? Because I am sure everyone agrees your point was really starting to slam home.

No more hypotheticals. You're too blinded by partisanship to even address them.

 

[bk1983]

Sorry you are so simple-minded.

Oh, good one. By the way you have any more genius hypotheticals to make your point? Because I am sure everyone agrees your point was really starting to slam home.

No more hypotheticals. You're too blinded by partisanship to even address them.

Oh really, so should Sanford resign or not?

 

[Nik]

Sanford cheated on his wife, zero ***** given, has no effect on you and me at all.

Pelosi and the others i named make policies that have an effect on everyone....

next ?

Sanford makes policies as well, genius. He is a govenor you know.

Dr Mr. Moonbat,

Sanford cheating on his wife has nothing to do with any political policy. On the other hand for example, ramming the belief of global warming down our throats and creating a stupid energy tax on the basis of beleiving this farce is a very big deal in terms of political policy. Hell, Sanford was AGAINST the stimulus disaster so obviously cheating on his wife has not had any effect on his policy making decisions.

Sincerely,

Mr. Common Sense

So what effect did Boxer have on policy when she asked someone to call her Senator? That was one of your examples of Democrat hypocrisy that was oh so much worse than Sanfords.

Good luck with that